• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the strengths an weaknesses of Herodtus' account of the Persian wars?

Extracts from this document...


What are the strengths and weaknesses of Herodotus' account of the Persian Wars? Since Cicero first dubbed Herodotus of Halicarnassus the "Father of History", historians hitherto have debated the point with such vigour that a second school of thought has emerged renaming the Greek author as the "Father of Lies". Critically, Herodotus has been subject to much scrutiny by both ancient contemporaries and modern historians alike. The combination of proven inaccuracies and the story telling written approach has led many historians to state that "he (Herodotus) compiled his information from gossip and from other travellers"1in order to dramatise what actually occurred. These views suggest that when studying the Persian Wars, any sources acquired from Herodotus' version must be taken lightly. On the other hand, Herodotus does not ride completely unsupported. The historian T.J. Luce indicates that history in the fifth century BC was not what we would recognise as history proper, but in fact a concoction of enthralling myth and legend designed to captivate the audience, much like the exemplary works of Homer. What warrants respect for Herodotus is the fact that the "invention of history proper depended on making a marked distinction between the two (myth/legend and actual history) which he in fact did unlike his predecessors"2. Thus implying that Herodotus fully merits his celebrated title as "The Father of History", and that "The Histories", should therefore be studied attentively in order to grasp an accurate image of the Persian Wars. ...read more.


However these sources cannot take anything away from Herodotus' effort to attain them. It is common knowledge that his travels took him great distances obtaining a large collection of different logioi both named and unnamed, Greek and foreign. Herodotus used a variety of techniques to manage all of his sources, frequently beginning tales "those with a story to tell" then finishing the story only to give his own assessment based on other informant's tales. However evidently many of these stories are wildly extravagant, for example Scyllias of Scione, a famous diver who is reported to have joined the Greek navy at the battle of Artemisium by submerging at Aphetae and swimming underwater for ten miles. Though Herodotus offers it as his considered opinion that Scyllias accomplished the journey on a boat, it is tales such as these that give W. Kendrick Pritchett his main target of ammunition in his book "The Liar School of Herodotus". Here a number of historians including Fehling, Powell and Pritchett argue that the wide range of such tales suggest that the truth behind "The Histories" is diluted by these myth like stories8. It would appear that Herodotus was willing to record all he had been told and put it forward as history rather than determine what actually happened in cases like our area of study; The Persian Wars. However this argument that lies as well as truths were recorded in "The Histories" is overshadowed by Herodotus' own claim; "I feel obliged to tell what is told to me, but I do not feel at all obliged to believe it... ...read more.


We have already uncovered that the Histories were written to grip the imagination of an audience and the audience quite clearly was a Greek one and not a Persian. Though admittedly Herodotus devotes a lot of study to the Persian way of life, it cannot be denied that Herodotus relished the opportunity to describe the bravery of the Spartans at Thermopylae or the tactical acuteness of Themistocles at Salamis. Therefore before we conclude we must consider the level of bias Herodotus may have directly or indirectly had. The conclusion to this question may appear to be straight forward. Indeed having assessed facts, sources, style and leniency it is fair to agree that Herodotus' account of the Persian Wars is not altogether accurate. A sense of dramatisation is a recurring theme throughout the argument against Herodotus as is so proven by the exaggerated facts, the inclusion of many unrealistic sources, the "storytelling" style in which it is written and finally the level of biased leniency towards the original audience. We can gather therefore that "The Histories" is a weak account of the Persian Wars. However, an argument that counter balances this claim is rightly referred to at the end. No matter how inaccurate scholars perceive "the Histories" to be, it still remains one of the only original sources that can tell us as 21st century historians of what truly occurred during that epic phase in history known as the Persian Wars. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Ancient History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Ancient History essays

  1. Compare the Greek and the Medieval ideas of the hero (support your answer with ...

    Therefore, they were more benevolent to their enemies. The Greek heroes in The Iliad were totally different. In The Iliad, after Achilles triumphed over Hector, Hector asked him not to throw his body to dogs and found his family to pay ransom for taking his body back home (Homer, Iliad Extract 22.5).

  2. Battle of Kadesh. Through this paper I will critically analyze the primary and secondary ...

    At the Ramesseum these reliefs are placed on internal temple surfaces. The reliefs at Karnak and Luxor appear on external surfaces, on the respective temple's western walls. Regardless of their placement, all of them share a similar orientation, facing west, in the direction of Amun's sanctuary, at the rear of the Ramesseum.

  1. Was Athens more democratic than Sparta?

    it, including the thetes who were men with very little wealth and property. The position was also paid so that poverty did not 'bar the way, but a [poor] man is able to serve the city, despite his lack of authority' (Thucydides 2.

  2. The Thermopylae Myth: Ancient and Modern attitudes to the Battle

    Educated Greeks would have been brought up on the works of Homer (Garland, 1985: 77) and the Spartans would have been no different. Indeed, Herodotus' version of events is akin to the description of Homer's heroes (Il. 12.310-21), whose courage matched their ambitions of immortality (Clarke, 2002: 65).

  1. To what extent did the Roman annexation of (and influence over) Greece affect Domestic ...

    the walls (comparable with Olynthian custom), rather than the Roman custom of a 'U' shaped couch placements in the centre (There is still debate about the arrangement of couches: Tr�mper 2007: 330). The Delian oecus also had two 'retiring' rooms attached to the side whereas Roman 'retiring' rooms were located away from the oecus (Ellis 2000: 49).

  2. 'The demos yearns for him and hates him too' (Aristophanes, Frogs 1425). Is this ...

    war, all combined to make the Athenians forgive him everything else, and they were constantly finding euphemisms for his lapses and putting them down to youthful high spirits and honourable ambition.'18 The content of this quotation suggests that a mystique built up around Alcibiades - the state benefactor; the warrior; the speaker; the ancient model.

  1. Does Herodotus offer adequate explanations for Greek colonisation during the archaic period?

    The fact that Herodotus says ?the Phocaeans and the Teans were the only Ionians who emigrated from the native lands rather than endure slavery? implies that external political pressure was limited as a reason for Greek colonisation. Colonisation stories similar to that of Dorieus would mainly have been restricting to

  2. To what extent is Thucydides critical of democracy? Is he less critical of democracy ...

    moderate policy of Pericles, which had clearly failed to keep the empire together. Furthermore, Cleon is extremely critical of Athens and its political order and from this, he states that it susceptible to what is called the three dangers of an empire: pity, sentiment, and indulgence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work