• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'What made Attila the Hun a great leader?'

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Warfare Through The Ages Major Research Assignment 'WHAT MADE ATTILA THE HUN A GREAT LEADER?' Due: 15th of November 2002 (Extension to the 18th) Mr. Fish By Julian Veerasingam I chose to research Attila the Hun because of his extraordinary achievements. He was able to hold the Eastern and Western Roman Empires at his mercy, conquer most of central Europe, and unite the Huns. So for my assignment I decided to research the focus question, 'What made Attila the Hun a great leader?' and see how he was able to accomplish such feats. I discuss in my assignment, the ten features of Attila that I thought made him great. THE TEN FEATURES OF ATTILA THE HUN THE DESIRE TO BE IN CHARGE Attila the Hun was an aggressive and ambitious general. When he was still a young man, his uncle died, leaving the throne to be shared between Attila and his brother, Bleda. But that wasn't good enough for the determined Attila. He wanted to be the sole ruler of the Huns so badly that he killed his own brother. ...read more.

Middle

He killed people at the first sign of disobedience, thereby setting the standard of respect between him and his people. Attila didn't allow uncontrolled celebration, and only let his men loot towns when done for the good of the Hunnish empire, and not for personal gain. NEVER ACCEPTING PEOPLE WITH THEIR OWN AMBITIONS A lot of Attila's army was made up of people he had conquered. So the majority of them would share a common hatred of the Huns. The new recruits personal ambitions were of revenge, which was a danger to the Huns. But after some time most people lose their ambitions and become team players. The remaining disloyal soldiers were disposed and made example of by Attila; he had no room for treachery in his ranks. There were people of many cultures in Attila's army, but they all eventually learnt to fight as one in battle, or be executed LIVING OUT THE REPUTATION GIVEN BY YOUR ENEMIES Attila's worst enemies called him the "Scourge of God" and the "Fear of the World." ...read more.

Conclusion

EXPLOITING THE SPOILS OF WAR Attila rewarded his men with minor gains after every looting. He believed that with these small rewards, he could buy the obedience and loyalty of his soldiers. Attila also kept plenty of booty for times when they were travelling a lot. After researching 'What made Attila the Hun a great leader?' I have been able to narrow it down to ten features Attila has shown throughout his life. Numerous of Attila's ten features can be found in other great commanders, such as Alexander the Great, Genghis Khan and Julius Caesar. I have learnt that victory and defeat in battle depends on the range of skills shown by the commander. The soldiers who do the fighting put their trust in their leader, and expect him to lead them to victory. Through Attila the Hun, other barbaric tribes were influenced to take on the Roman Empires, which evitable led to the 'Fall of Rome'. I have also learnt that warfare is what drives technological advancement. Attila wanted the Huns to be able to match the innovations of Rome. This is what took the Huns out of the 'Stone Age Era', so to speak. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Ancient History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Ancient History essays

  1. The Romans and their invasion of Britian

    It was usually at the point where the two main streets crossed. The forum was usually surrounded on three sides by a covered walkway, which contained shops and offices. BASILICA On the forth side of the forum the basilica stood.

  2. Who was Alexander the Great.

    The learning of grammar, natural sciences, rhetoric, politics and especially Homer's Iliad were Alexander's tools for success (Alexander's childhood). Alexander and Aristotle had a "father and son" relationship and during his expedition Alexander used to send letters to his teacher expressing his admiration.

  1. Alexander the Great and His Army.

    Of course, training was constant (third improvement). The phalanx, the cavalry, the hypaspists, the bridge train, the siege train, each arm of the service honed their skills as only a standing army could. Moreover, the various arms (phalanx, cavalry) trained together to coordinate their objectives.

  2. Which battle can we consider to have been the most important turning point in ...

    The battle began in the morning, soon after the Greeks had sung their paean. The Marines boarded the triremes and the ships then began to manoeuvre further into the straits in an orderly fashion. It appears the Corinthian contingent of ships under Adeimantos began to sail away northwards as the

  1. Discern the Aims of Alexander the Great

    The historian Paul Cartledge expands this argument when studying further Alexander's fixation with the Homeric novels "For Alexander personally embodied to the utmost degree the Homeric injunction 'always to be the best and excel all others'"7. It is clear from this that Alexander saw himself as a man of destiny

  2. Discussing the biblical historiography of images of the Jew in the ancinet world

    Collins argues that the author of Daniel 2 endowed the hero with the skill of dream interpretation because oracles and dream interpretations played such a large part in the profession of a wise man at the Babylonian (or other near eastern)

  1. Compare the ideology of kingship in the Assyrian, Achaemenid and Seleucid empires

    Traditionally, the King's role as political leader went hand in hand with religious leader and so it was a good move politically to adopt the latter in order to succeed in the former. Seleucid kings actively participated in religious ceremonies in Babylonia, fully embracing their role as religious leaders and establishing a continuity with Babylonian kings.

  2. How did Swedish and French diplomatic relations affect the Thirty-Years War?

    The first such diplomatic meeting which gave a considerable result was in B�rwalde in 1631. The Swedish had successfully invaded Germany a year earlier but were now in economic crisis. Richelieu was on his side more willing to support the Swedish king knowing of his military success, and on the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work