Grose

Jaimie Grose

Colonial American Literature                

Professor Shannon

September 19, 2002

Who Were the Puritans?

        IN 1572, “a group of reformers in the House of Commons” brought forward a bill calling for the legalization of nonconformity of the kind called “Puritan.”  Queen Elizabeth, however, suppressed the bills concerning religion. They could no longer be introduced “without her approval.”  These reformers did, however, bring their concerns into the open (Vaughn 3).

        Puritans were a people who did not believer in the laws of men. Rather, they followed strictly the laws of God.  It was believed, by many Kings and Queens, that they were chosen by God to rule over their people. This included making laws.  The Church of England was also the church that everyone had to attend by law.  James I made good strides when he used some Puritan ideas in his King James Version of the Bible (1611), however, it was not a Puritan document.  Puritanism remained underground (Vaughn 13).

        “As Puritanism and the ideas that went along with Puritanism spread, the determination of the Anglican establishment to stop nonconformist movement grew.”  The government used different methods of trying to discourage the Puritans including, “issuing decrees against unorthodox practices, increasing supervision over local clergymen, and removing ministers from their livings” (Vaughn 20).  Then, in 1629, Charles I dissolved the Parliament and with this Puritans gave up most of their hopes of reforming the church (Vaughn 25, 35).

Join now!

        John Winthrop, a former attorney, helped convince Puritans to come to the New World.  On August 29, 1629, the Cambridge Agreement was signed.  This gave the Puritans who moved to the Massachusetts Bay Colony a charter freeing the people from the British government and free from interference by company officers (Vaughn 58).

The company and charter went with them, as an effective means of prevention these instruments from falling into the controls of others who might be unfriendly to the religious aims of the colony and consequently interfere with the successful establishment of the ideal Bible Commonwealth they envisioned (Waller ...

This is a preview of the whole essay