• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was the unity of the Dutch Republic so short lived?

Extracts from this document...


Why was the unity of the Dutch Republic so short lived? Unity is a remarkable attribute for a country to possess; it induces stability, pride and prosperity. However the Dutch Republic has always been under scrutiny due to the fragility of its existence. Evidence for the divisions within the Republic are recurrent throughout the period, apparently "It was vital to know whether a Dutchman was an Amsterdammer or a Leidanaar or a Haarlemmer."1 It is clear from this that the separate provinces retained their separate identities, was a type of unity possible in this manner? And if so, was it this factor of detached unity alone, which prevented the Republic from maintaining any sort of unification? It is important to discover why the inhabitants of the republic never felt secure despite a largely prosperous and influential position within Europe, and furthermore, what factors affected the inability for, ultimately the Netherlands, but essentially the republic to unite and remain together. Established in 1579 and collapsing in 1795, the Dutch republic existed over two centuries within the Netherlands. Understanding the formation of the Republic is imperative in order to comprehend how unity or disunity occurred throughout its existence. ...read more.


It is true however, that the Stadhouder had only limited power based on a number of Factors. Primarily any desire for a monarchical type position depended from individual to individual, additionally there was no system in place to implement decisions that might have come out of the Hague, the meeting place of the provinces' representatives. Effectively influence of merchants, popular opinion, war and factions were to dictate the future of the Netherlands. No Stadhouder ever held absolute power or indeed had the means to impose it, the Republic did not unite in this way. The Netherlands held such a hegemonic position in the early seventeenth century within Europe because of their immense trading influence. The Republic formed the core of all the major thriving centres inside of the Netherlands at this time, and was, as trade turned more to the sea and further from land, strategically and financially well placed to exploit trading options. To the Atlantic was fishing, to the Baltic grain, timber and iron and to Africa and the East Indies there lay trade in slaves, spices and luxury goods. This early success was to be the Achilles heel of the Republic as it incensed both the English and French that their domination was being challenged. ...read more.


't Hart infers that "the example of the Dutch Republic wipes out this casual regularity"6 and indeed it does. This non-absolutist state that developed could have both increased or decreased the unity of the Republic. If the provinces were to find common ground and goals, then an ideal situation might have developed, and unity possibly assured. And if in fact the area remained separated and linked only by a signed 'Union' and the occasional coming together for war, prosperity may have remained a distant dream. What the Dutch Republic actually managed to do, was find some middle ground during the seventeenth century. The provinces retained their own identity and separate goals, yet provided a support structure in case any one were to collapse. They endured many years of wars, without collapse and amazingly without unification, different provinces fulfilled different requirements, for example Amsterdam provided funds, and through the one common aim: defence of their provinces, and there for the republic, they managed to prosper during adverse times. The unity of the Dutch Republic was not short lived it simply never existed. Unity in the sense of identity, nationalism and government were very hard to find in the Netherlands in the seventeenth century. Resilience and desires for success and peace were ever present and resulted in over two centuries of the regime. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1600-1699 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1600-1699 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    'Repressive and emotionally cold'. Is this a true reflection of relations between parents and ...

    4 star(s)

    clear example of how a child should be treated, distinguishing it from the adult. In addition, like Pollock suggests "children are all too dependant on adult care and attention", to not be separated from adults.34 Relationships between parents and children need to be placed into context before one could ever conclude that parental approaches were 'repressive and emotionally cold'.

  2. The Dutch trade during the Anglo- Dutch wars. The Anglo-Dutch wars were instigated ...

    This resulted in England declaring war on the Dutch Republic on July 10, 1652.4 The first Anglo-Dutch war started with minor battles; however the Dutch eventually pushed the English navy back into the English Channel. Yet the English fought back leaving both sides claiming victory in 1654.

  1. Why was Richelieu's foreign policy so politically divisive from 1624-42?

    The first stage of the War of Mantuan Succession began when the French Duke of Nevers claimed the duchies of Mantua and Montferrat. The governor of Milan, Don Gonzalo de C�rdoba was given orders by Spain to lay siege to the stronghold of Casale.

  2. Why had the policies of Charles I and his ministers aroused so much opposition ...

    The pomp of the ceremony alienated Charles from Scotland, and reforms there created a very public sense of resentment. His introduction of a new book of Canons based on an English edition in 1637 caused widespread rioting across Scotland, and Charles's refusal to reach a compromise led to preparations for war within a year.

  1. The Importance of the Diary for a Study of Archbishop Laud

    Thus, despite the assertions of other ministers, such as Archbishop Abbott, that 'there is not in the Church of England, left any inconformable minister, which appeareth'10, it is evident from the diary that Laud in no way shared this view, and instead set himself firmly against the danger posed by theological controversy which he believed Puritans, in particular, engendered.

  2. Salem, Spectral Evidence and Recovered Memory Syndrome

    can in fact be discovered: ?[only] a free and Voluntary Confession of the Crime . . . is a sufficient ground of Conviction.? (Callis 2005, 189) In absence of a voluntary confession of witchcraft, Mather asserted, the rooting out of true witches was nearly impossible.

  1. Alexandre de Rhodes and the Vietnamese culture

    De Rhodes had begun with his missionary work in Vietnam on 1624 or early 1625, he spent his time in Cochinchina, learning the Vietnamese language and engrossed himself in the culture?s religion, customs and government of the country. After 18 months, he moved to Tonkin in 1627, where he and

  2. How far was the English civil war a result of rule over multiple kingdoms?

    Bearing all this in mind, is it any wonder that groups of the English population began to express their doubts towards Charles and his duty to ?uphold the faith?. However, although all this did fuel into the mounting grievances towards Charles himself and the likelihood of a civil war, the fear of popery itself did not cause the conflict.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work