• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was war so fundamental to social and political organisation in ancient Rome? Was it ideology or necessity that drove the ancient worlds to war?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Marcus Hartung Centre for Open Education MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY NSW 2109 AUSTRALIA ASSIGNMENT COVER SHEET (For Open Universities Australia students) Office Use Only ** Student Name Family Name HARTUNG Given Name MARCUS JOHN FREDERICK Student Number 42505712 Date 21st JUNE 2012 Unit Code HST220 Unit Name WAR AND PEACE IN WORLD HISTORY COE USE ONLY Date Received Assignment No. 1 Assignment Title SHORT ESSAY Due Date 22ND JUNE 2012 Contact Info Phone:0409355686 Email:Marcus.hartung@students.mq.edu.au Word Count (If Applicable) 1000 Turnitin No. (If Applicable) N/A ACADEMIC HONESTY DECLARATION (this is very important please read carefully): By placing my name in this document I declare that: 1. This assessment is my own work, based on my personal study and/or research; 2. I have acknowledged all material and sources used in the preparation of this assessment, including any material generated in the course of my employment; 3. If this assessment was based on collaborative preparatory work, as approved by the teachers of the unit, I have not submitted substantially the same final version of any material as another student; 4. Neither the assessment, nor substantial parts of it, have been previously submitted for assessment in this or any other institution; 5. I have not copied in part, or in whole, or otherwise plagiarised the work of other students; 6. ...read more.

Middle

At the heart of the Roman Republic was a vigorous aristocracy powered by a social ethos that valued concepts of laus and gloria ? fame and glory, above all others.[1] Such was the power of these two concepts that without them, success in either of the inexorably entwined facets of Roman life was unlikely. Ten years military service was a requirement of political office and individual prowess that furthered Rome?s glorification provided a fast track to a consulship.[2] Affirming this through ancient source evidence is Plutarch?s recording of seven-times consul Gaius Marius? boast that he had ?carried off the consulship/as spoils of war?.[3] War had established itself as the vehicle by which the aristocracy could further their political career, whilst furthering Rome?s frontiers. The nexus is obvious; Rome?s almost permanent war-footing during this period was the consequence of an ideology that required the benefits of battlefield glory to be in perpetual availability.[4] This assertion does not detract from, or negate Rome?s empire building and wealth seeking motivations towards war, as the two were firmly linked and mutually beneficial. The latter however was evident in many ancient societies, but the symbiotic relationship between war and sociopolitical organisation was almost exclusively a Roman phenomenon. It is important when positing war?s influential primacy on social custom and political policy in Republican Rome that a picture of mindless barbaric aggression is not presented. ...read more.

Conclusion

aggression, in later post-Republican years its over extension of frontiers resulted in a fragility that saw it consumed entirely with their defence.[13] Consolidating and protecting frontiers and the pacification of conquered inhabitants tested the thinly stretched Roman military capabilities, and wars initiated years earlier through ideology became now, wars of necessity.[14] Any historical analysis of ancient Rome reveals a fascinating and unique utilitarian preoccupation and relationship with war. Though other ancient societies utilised its methods in gaining power and wealth, it was Rome that integrated it into its sociopolitical structure. The zealous ideology of the Romans embraced war, breathed life into it, fanned its flames, and then basked in its light and warmth. The preceding analysis examined how war carried Rome to an unprecedented hegemonic predominance and the Roman people dutifully wore its essence as confirmation of their identity. Weaving it into the very fabric of their society, war facilitated the Roman machine to a degree unknown in other ancient societies. When assessing the question of whether ideology or necessity drove the ancient worlds to war, the answer is subjective to a particular society for all except Rome. Different societies were motivated for different reasons, but Republican Rome?s predilection for war was a direct result of an ideological determination. This scenario, as mentioned earlier, eventuated ultimately and somewhat ironically, into necessity as its expansion finally peaked and the inevitable contraction began; Rome was in decline. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Ancient History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Ancient History essays

  1. The Romans and their invasion of Britian

    By out standards these sports were extremely violent - most involved humans and animals in acts of great cruelty. Popularity shows that in the Roman day's life was extremely brutal and cheap. Up to twenty-four races a day could be expected.

  2. Was the Fall of the Roman Republic inevitable?

    Once again through use of violence the senate was able to prevail over the popular sentiment, continuing the aforementioned violent tone set by the previous Gracchus's 'execution', but we still cannot say that the republic is on an unstoppable decline as the senate is still powerful and popular politics was

  1. To what extent was the elimination of heresy achieved at the expense of personal ...

    The majority of Spaniards had a limited education and many were illiterate. Most common people received a basic education through the Church. Such people continued practicing their superstitious Catholic based faith and therefore remained unaffected by the banning of certain books.

  2. Attitudes to outsiders in Ancient Greece: Who is allowed into the household and why?

    mean that it became highly visible to the community (Morgan 2010: 27-8). After a baby was born, the household in which the birth took place needed an allotted period of separation until it became unpolluted and re-entered the community (Morgan 2010: 30-1).

  1. From studying The Penguin Book of First World War Poetry and Birdsong by Sebastian ...

    This can be seen when Weir hopes 'a great bombardment would smash down along Piccadilly'. Birdsong also highlights the difficulty soldiers felt when trying to integrate back into society when the war was over. This can be seen when Weir returns home from war and notices how the 'denseness of silence pressed his ears'.

  2. Discuss the contributing factors and progress of the fall of the Roman Republic

    It is true to say that there was a significant decline in pietas within the Roman people putting much more pressure on the fragile system of the Republic but in the Senate where simple and respectful duty was most needed it was noticeably absent.

  1. Anthony J. Spalingers book, War in Ancient Egypt is an introduction to the Egyptian ...

    In contrast to the chariots and horses being used in the north against the Hyksos, the battle in the south was mainly fought with men on foot accompanied by the Egyptian version of a navy. "The usefulness of the royal flotilla meant that troops could be hastened to any site as rapid as possibly.

  2. Peloponnesian Politics: What can the events between the First Macedonian War and the Achaean ...

    in the region and so Metellus did not take umbrage when the Achaean council declined his request via envoy to delay action against Sparta (Gruen 1976: 56). Later in the year, Metellus sent another envoy to the League, requesting it to call off action against Sparta until a senatorial embassy

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work