• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The least one can expect from a Court is that it be consistent and promote legal certainty. If the Court of Justice decides that directives only impose obligations on Member States and only after the period for their transposition has expired, liti

Extracts from this document...


"The least one can expect from a Court is that it be consistent and promote legal certainty. If the Court of Justice decides that directives only impose obligations on Member States and only after the period for their transposition has expired, litigants, especially private litigants, would be able to rely on that. They should not have to meander their way through obscure doctrines to second guess whether the Court might find some way to give effect to a directive prior to the transposition deadline or to make it produce effects detrimental to individuals." DISCUSS The inherent need in any system for there to be legal certainty is a sentiment, which has long been expressed by academics alike, seen perhaps most influentially by Albert Venn Dicey, in his analysis of the rule of law. He stated that to do otherwise, would be to govern arbitrarily. This essay will seek to explore how the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has adapted new rules, contrary to what they have previously stated, on the ability to give effect to directives and whether they have perhaps entered into the 'political thicket', which contravenes Montesquieu's doctrine of separation of powers. The initial part of the assertion makes reference to judgements of the Court and Treaty Articles. The definition in Article 249 shows that: directives have distinct objectives, in that they are 'binding as the result to be achieved', but in effect create obligations on Member States to pass national laws to achieve those objectives within a set period of time. ...read more.


This shows one of the harsh injustices faced by litigants, in that there is a poor rationale underlying the absence of horizontal direct effect of a Directive. Private litigants suffer the worse, as a consequence of the Marshall ruling in that, for example, a private employee may not rely on a Directive but a state employee may. As S Douglas-Scoot commented: the ruling provokes unjust and anomalous situations, particularly in the field of labour law, where the scope of the Equal treatment Directive has been reduced.'9 One such obscure doctrine, that the ECJ has created alongside direct effect, is the concept of indirect effect. The principle was developed in Von Colson10, where it was stated that: 'since the duty under Article 10 to ensure fulfilment of an obligation was binding on all national courts...it follows...courts are required to interpret their national law in the light of the wording and purpose of the Directive'. This concept of sympathetic interpretation thus ignored the problem of horizontal effect and vertical effect, and in fact ignored direct effect in general. However, the ECJ left ambiguous the question of to which national law, the process of indirect effect could actually apply. The House of Lords, thus subsequently refused to apply the principle in Duke, even though it would have provided a remedy for the applicant. In Marleasing11, the definition of indirect effect was expanded in saying: "the national court asked to interpret national law is bound to do so in every way possible in the light of the text and the aims of the directive to achieve the results envisaged by it." ...read more.


This is an inadequate justification, because it begs to ask what about the two other methods aforementioned above. If indirect effect were used, then the UK would have been forced to comply with the Directive. But more importantly, had direct effect been used, in vein prescribed in Ratti, then the UK's inability to satisfy the Directive's requirement would be purely academic and of no concern, as the Directive would have become directly effective. It is decisions such as these, which see the helter-skelter of the ECJ's jurisdiction. The ECJ has often cited the concepts of 'supremacy' and 'supra-nationalism' as justifications for their judicial activist approach. Whilst these concepts remain fundamental to the functioning of the entire organism that is the EU, the ECJ must be careful not to attempt to wear more hats than they have been assigned, in their quest for creating a coherent Europe. As seen, in attempting to do so, they have reached conflicting decisions, which makes it hard for litigants at times to know what to expect from their judiciary. 1 (Case 41/74) [1974] ECR 1337 2 (Case 26/62) [1963] ECR 1 3 (Case 148/78) [1979] ECR 1629 4 (Case 152/84) [1986] QB 401 5 (Case C-188/89) [1990] ECR I-3313 6 [1995] IRLR 15 7 1 CMLR 1045 8 [1988] 2 WLR 359 9 Constitutional Law of the European Union, By S Douglas Scott p296 10 (Case 79/83) [1984] ECR 1921 11 (Case C-106/89) [1990] ECR I-4135 12 [1989] 1 All ER 1134 13 Textbook on EC Law, By J Steiner, p109 14 (Cases C-6 and 9?90) [1991] ECR I-5357 15 (Case C-46) [1996] ECR I-1029 16 Ratti 17 (Case C-392/93) [1996] ECR I-1631 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree European Union Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree European Union Law essays

  1. Predatory pricing strategies in the European union: A case for legal reform.

    its price, should it wish to prevail over its less efficient rivals, although such price might have been explained by its legitimate desire to attract new customers, even at the expense of its rivals, and might have entailed no resource misallocations.

  2. EU Freedom of Establishment. In this essay I will discuss the definition of establishment ...

    dentists18 and a restriction on multidisciplinary partnerships between lawyers and accountants19 have been held to be restrictions on the freedom of establishment. As with other fundamental economic freedoms, such restrictions may be justified by the MS, subject to the principle of proportionality.

  1. Critically evaluate the impact of the E.U. Directive on Copyright in an Information Society, ...

    Neither of these interpretations would satisfy copyright owners. By hindering research into cryptography (as the DMCA has been shown to have done 4 ), right-holders will have fewer methods by which to protect their work, by creating a loophole, the Directive will have found a way round its own provisions for those seeking to aid the practice of infringement.

  2. How far has the creation of a single market in goods resulted in the ...

    Direct discrimination; where tax provisions openly treat imported and domestic goods differently is often avoided by member states as it is easily identifiable. Indirect discrimination involves cases where the taxation system appears neutral but effectively discriminates against imported products. In Humblot30 car taxation indirectly put imported cars at a competitive

  1. Critically discuss the proposition that the Treaty of Lisbon has completed the evolution of ...

    A look at the Charter's provisions has best described as a gifted crystallization of existing fundamental rights contained in the ECHR.20 What's more, the language used by the drafters of the Charter also reflects existing national, EU and international provisions.

  2. EU - problem question

    favour of the applicant, and that a preliminary ruling on the matter held that the Italian immigration law was incompatible with EU law, the Commission is likely to be successful in a potential future action with the UK. With regard to the remedies available to the Commission, from the ratification of the Maastricht Treaty 1993, Art 228 (EC)

  1. EU Law

    It is noteworthy that although in the Broekmeulen matter the Appeals Committee was a private body and not recognized as a 'court or tribunal' under Dutch law, it operated with the consent of the public authorities and 'with their cooperation', it exercised great control over the practice of medicine in the Netherlands and hence the decision by the ECJ.

  2. EU Law - Albatros Pool problem case. Mark and Sunita must be advised that ...

    The Treaty of Rome specifies, in Article 249, that regulations:- "shall have general application and be binding in their entirety and directly applicable in all Member States." That is all well and good and creates little difficulty. However, the said Article also provides that directives are:- "binding, as to the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work