• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Criminal justice: Sentencing law & practice

Extracts from this document...


CRIMINAL JUSTICE: SENTENCING LAW & PRACTICE "Sentencing consists in trying to reconcile a number of totally irreconcilable facts. The judges get very little help in this difficult matter"Lord Lane, Hansard HL, vol 486, col. 1285 The purpose of this essay is to evaluate the validity of the above quote by Lord Lane in light of the current framework. The sentencing of a convicted criminal is a difficult job, and often causes public outrage at 'weak' sentencing by the judge (often without reason - the public has not taken in to account mitigating factors, defences, previous convictions etc.) The aims of criminal sentencing have traditionally been said to be retribution, deterrence and rehabilitation. To these there may now perhaps be added: incapacitation (i.e. putting it out of the power of the offender to commit further offences) and the maintenance of public confidence. It is obvious that the different sentences available to the courts serve these purposes in very different measures. For example, a sentence of imprisonment is very largely retributive, punitive, although it will prevent the offender committing further offences while imprisoned and may deter others from offending. A sentence of imprisonment is not usually passed with a view to rehabilitating the offender, even if in a minority of cases it has that effect. ...read more.


The matters which may, in a proper case, mitigate the seriousness of an offence or the severity of a sentence are legion. They may, depending on all the facts, include such matters as: uncharacteristic behaviour under the influence of intoxication, the voluntary payment of compensation, lapse of time since commission of the offences, the consequences of conviction or sentence, responsibility for dependents, youth or old age, emotional stress, financial need, illness or disability; assistance to the police; provocation. In most cases the two most potent grounds of mitigation are likely to be an early plea of guilty and a previous good character. An example of this is Aug Ref (No.106.of 2002) Jan 31st,2003,CA, Defender Hall who was charged with two counts of sexual intercourse with a girl aged 12 years old and received 12 months for each offence. He pleaded guilty to the two offences which is on its own is a mitigating factor. However its a little more complicated, as shown below. Aggravating Factors Mitigating Factors - Age differential between offender - Relationship between offender and victim. and victim (consensual) - multiple offence (instigated by - No previous convictions offender) for sexual offences (could be other different offences) - effect on the victim - Offender not in position of (impact statement from girls trust (does not mitigate in this mother, in her opinion the offence) ...read more.


The Court of Appeal has from time to time issued decisions which are specifically referred to a "guidelines" for future use. However, even these "guidelines" do not deprive judges of their discretion over the sentences which are ultimately imposed in individual cases. The Court of Appeal has always been wary of giving the impression that its decisions are to be regarded as absolutely authoritative and has often stressed that each case depends on its own facts. The Government has sought to encourage the Court of Appeal to produce sentencing guidelines for a wider range of criminal offences on a more systematic basis. Section 80 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 requires the Court of Appeal to consider producing or revising sentencing guidelines, whenever it hears an appeal against sentence, reviews a sentence referred to it by the Attorney-General under the Criminal Justice Act 1988, or receives a proposal from the Sentencing Advisory Panel established under section 81 of the 1998 Act. In considering guidelines, the Court must have regard to: ??the need to promote consistency in sentencing; ??the pattern of sentencing for similar offences; ??the cost and effectiveness of different sentences; and ??the need to promote public confidence in the criminal justice system. Any guidelines produced must include criteria for determining the seriousness of offences, including criteria for determining the weight to be given to any previous convictions of offenders or any failure to respond to previous sentences. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Criminal law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Criminal law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Analysis of the law relating to the offence of Murder and relevant offences of ...

    4 star(s)

    The concept of Battered Women Syndrome32 is not new in the English jurisdiction and has gained much support through other jurisdiction and by judicial decisions.33 However there is no precise definition provided of BWS, but it is clear that women who live with violent men do suffer from a mental

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Criminal Law - A Miscarriage of Justice.

    4 star(s)

    She can't so she must be guilty. During the initial trial, there were nine days of very complex and conflicting medical evidence for the jury to digest, some of which Stephen Clark, an experienced lawyer, struggled to understand. In the middle of this medical confusion, within a few moments of

  1. The Criminal Justice Act 1988, s.39 provides that assault is a summary offence with ...

    39 with a battery, as he intentionally and recklessly applied unlawful force upon Sanjay. Offences Against the Person Act 1861, s. 47 According to s. 47: Whoever shall be convicted upon an indictment of any assault occasioning actual bodily harm shall be liable....

  2. Outline the factors that influence sentencing decisions of criminal courts in England and Wales ...

    Six main theories are found in most jurisdictions, although the balance between different theories varies according to the prevailing sentencing policy of any individual system, which may place a greater emphasis on one aim or on a particular combination. The six theories are retribution, incapacitation, rehabilitation, deterrence, denunciation and restitution.

  1. Law of Rape

    And, certainly whatever may be the moral implications, seduction ought never to be confused with rape."60 His Honour also pointed out that as a matter of statutory construction, once a woman had consented to penetration, what happened thereafter constituting the same act of intercourse, could not be said to be

  2. The aim of this project is to explore and analyse the role of the ...

    response to our previous neglect of the topic, it is difficult to identify the reason for the victim's new prominence in the study of criminal law. This is because there is no single reason. The recent call for more respect for the victim's interests, rights, and perspective within the criminal justice system is sympathetic to the victims6.

  1. Physical Resistance in Rape

    v. Pitt 27 the accused maintained that while he had participated in various sexual acts with the complainant, they were all consensual. The judge defined "force" as "physical contact".

  2. This essay will discuss the similarities between the Irish and UK legislation on assisted ...

    She argued that she had a right to know what penalty her husband would face if he accompanied her to the Dignitas clinic in Switzerland.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work