• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically evaluate the impact of the E.U. Directive on Copyright in an Information Society, 2001/29/EC, on the problems posed for musical copyright owners by the development of the Internet. Does the Directive achieve, in your view, a workable and effec

Extracts from this document...


Directive on Copyright - E.U Critically evaluate the impact of the E.U. Directive on Copyright in an Information Society, 2001/29/EC, on the problems posed for musical copyright owners by the development of the Internet. Does the Directive achieve, in your view, a workable and effective balance between copyright owners and Internet users? Copyrights Owners' Perspective The concept of copyright is essential to the development of new concepts and ideas. It is the reward for composer's work when producing a song or piece of music. It gives the owners of such works a level of control over what is done with it once it has been created. The provisions specifically designed to protect copyright owners' rights can be found in Articles 1,2,3,4,6 and 7. These rights ensure that the copyright owners' have the right to be identified as the author and have the exclusive right to reproduce, control and distribute their works. The creation of the Internet brought with it a number of difficulties in enforcing the rights of composer's. It is effectively "one large copy machine that can make and distribute an unlimited number of copies of content worldwide." 1 . The availability and increasingly widespread use of the Internet has made it infinitely possible for thousands, if not millions, of users to copy, download, and distribute songs and music, without the knowledge or supervision of the original author. This in turn makes it infinitely impossible for the authors to control the use of their material once it is out of their hands. The problem with this is that it may lead to a reluctance to create such works due to being unable to fully exploit it once created. The Internet is also fast-paced and uses rapidly advancing levels of technology, of which the governing laws are having increasing difficulty keeping up with. The Directive was therefore an attempt at resolving. It manages to promote some level of standardisation within the EU regarding copyright and related rights. ...read more.


However, the exposure provided on the Internet has meant that the popularity of particular artists has soared, not because of the legal advertising and marketing efforts of their management, but rather the illegal dissemination of information and music available on the Internet. For example, the rise of pop star, Eminem was seen to be a result of the mass of information about him and the volume of downloadable music created by him. It seems that the stars who are most hit by free downloads are the 'mega superstars' such as Celine Dion, whereas the vast majority of musical copyright owners are actually helped by the music available on the Internet. Ipsos-Reid found, in a recent survey, that 84% of people using the Internet for these purposes, are also listening to song clips, reading about lyrics and tour information, and researching bands prior to actually purchasing their CD. 47% of these individuals indicate that they have subsequently purchased a CD from a band or artist, solely because of something they first read or listened to on the Internet. 29% indicate that their typically preferred genre of music has changed since the inception of their downloading behaviours and 21% report that their radio listening activities have also changed since they began downloading. Instat-MDR estimates that on-line music revenues are expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 33.4% between 2001 and 2006, while revenue from downloading and streaming are expected to remain less than 10% of total revenues through the year 2004 8. Based on these findings, the artists are receiving income indirectly from the free downloads because the users are subsequently purchasing the CD's, giving them increased sales through mass exposure. Therefore, since they are being compensated for their efforts in producing this work, the free downloads and their providers should fall within the exemption in Article 5, paragraph 3 which states that private use should be allowed only if the author is fairly compensated. ...read more.


A slower convergence of laws could then take place. When looking at balancing the opposing rights, care should be taken to ensure that neither party is seen as being the one who is favoured. If the Internet users are seen as being favoured, the copyright owners will have less incentive to continue creating their works and further abuses over the Internet may take place if the law is regarded as being 'too soft'. If the copyright holders are seen as being favoured, the Internet users will feel that they have been 'hard done by' and will refuse to police the Internet as they will be the only ones who will know who is doing the infringing and how to deal with this. The matter itself however, should be kept in context and must not be seen as being totally out of hand. Despite the number of unauthorised downloads that take place every year, there is a much higher percentage of people lawfully downloading for completely legitimate reasons. This must not be forgotten. A final point to note would be that once a global system of governance is put into place, it would have to be enforced on a global scale. Rather than trying defendants in their own country's or in the country's where the infringement took place, they should be tried in a completely neutral place, for example, a separate court set up to deal exclusively with Internet related law. Since the Internet itself has no physical boundaries, the law's governing it should not have physical boundaries either. Intellectual property is completely different in the way it behaves than physical property and should therefore be treated accordingly. Remoaldo, P (June 1998), Copyright Infringement, Law and Borders on the Internet, Portugal Citation not found Description and explanation of cryptography found in: Midge, J. T. J. (21 August 2002), Critique of the Proposed UK Implementation of the EU Copyright Directive <uk.eurorights.org> As in footnote 7 above Metro-Goldwyn Mayer v Grokster Rosen, H (28 February 2002) Letter to the Honourable Rick Boucher (Congressman). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree European Union Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree European Union Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    What is the meaning of the term 'measure equivalent to a quantitative restriction' for ...

    4 star(s)

    not really differentiate between domestic goods and imports, but they do in fact have the effect of creating some sort of inequality between the two. Article 3 outlines the intent of the Commission as regards the application of Article 28 in these matters.

  2. What are the outer limits of Article 28 EU?

    of a division of labour between Member States"28 and in turn this could affect the free movement of workers and services, as they are all inter connected. Again the broad scope that the court attaches to Article 28 is brought to the forefront.

  1. Predatory pricing strategies in the European union: A case for legal reform.

    [FN55] Liggett alleged that Brown & Williamson had violated section 2 of the Sherman Act (monopolisation) and section 7 of the Clayton Act (primary-line price discrimination). In its reasoning, the Supreme Court stated that, where the consideration of circumstances prevailing in the relevant market would preclude speculation concerning the prospective

  2. Critically evaluate the above statement in the context of EC law making, paying particular ...

    When introduced Article 252 was used far more frequently than 251 however the Treaty of Niece has redressed the balance. It is arguable that the control the Parliament has over the legislative process makes it more accountable then if it were totally left to the auspices of the Council.

  1. How far has the creation of a single market in goods resulted in the ...

    Selling arrangements, which did not affect imports, should not be restricted51. This is a very legalistic distinction, difficult to apply. Nevertheless it appears to provide a route through which the courts can be less invasive of states' sovereignty, derogating from the de minimus rule as in EC competition law.

  2. EU Law - age discrimination and market access case studies.

    From Article 36, they could use the protection of health of humans. From the Cassis requirements also they could use the 'protection of public health' derogation. These must satisfy the proportionality test of Walter Rau again. We feel here the blanket ban on advertising greatly disadvantages non-domestic producers as explained above.

  1. Critically discuss the proposition that the Treaty of Lisbon has completed the evolution of ...

    The proposal for a Regulation on enhanced surveillance ensures that a euro area Member State should be subject to enhanced surveillance when it is experiencing - or at risk of experiencing - severe financial disturbance, with a view to ensuring its swift return to a normal situation and to protecting

  2. EU Law - Albatros Pool problem case. Mark and Sunita must be advised that ...

    The first one is a recent decision by the UK Government to introduce a plastic bag tax on non-reusable plastic bags that are provided or sold in shops. The purpose of the measure is to encourage consumers to use reusable carrier bags for shopping.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work