• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

European Law

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

FOUNDATIONS OF EUROPEAN LAW Q) If the Working Time Directive is directly effective, discuss why it was necessary for the Commission to take action against the UK in case C-484/04 Commission v United Kingdom, judgement September 7, 2006. INTRODUCTION If the Working Time Directive1 has 'direct effect', which means that an individual can take action directly against a member state, when in breach, in their national courts by applying the directive, then the question arises whether there is an actual requirement for proceedings to be taken by the Commission against the United Kingdom (UK) at all. In my opinion there are multi-faceted aspects of these enforcement actions by the Commission that lead me to believe that they are indispensable. They include both general, broad reasons relating to the European Community at large and specific reasons relating to the United Kingdom and the Directive in question, each will be dealt with in turn. A SUMMARY OF THE CASE Article 226 of the European Community (EC) Treaty confers power on the Commission to bring an action against a Member State 'which it considers to be in breach of their obligations under Community law'2, thus the Commission brought an action against the UK in matters relating to the transposition of the Working Time Directive 93/104/EC, concerning the organisation of working time, into national law. The Commission claimed that the national law of the UK infringed community law in specific reference to right of minimum daily and weekly rest periods and the complaints were based on two grounds. The first being that the derogation article 17(1) of the directive which was transposed as regulation 20(2) ...read more.

Middle

When the commission brings action there is no requisite for such a criteria to be fulfilled, as it is directly against the member state and would deal with problems of all the individuals and consequently covers the problem of no horizontal direct effect for directives.13 HARMONISATION The Commission is seen as a neutral body and is entrusted by the Community to act as a guardian of Community law, originally the binding nature of directives and their effectiveness was intended by the Treaty to be protected by the Commission, irrespective of the existence of the doctrine of direct effect. The concept of harmonisation which needs to be inherent in such a system as the European Union to achieve a single market, needs Commission enforcement to make the law of all member states stand at the same level. Varying attitudes of national courts to European Community law does not aid harmonisation and only an institution of the Community, such as the Commission can be successful in doing this.14 The Working Time Directive was intended to guarantee improved protection of safety and health of workers and is not only a fundamental cornerstone of worker's welfare, but also as a central feature of the social dimension of the internal market, especially in light of enlargement of the Community, and thus the Commission will be more efficient in achieving this harmonisation as it is a body that is aware of the purpose and aims intended by the Directive in question and takes action to maintain these Community principles.15 Another general point in my opinion that is worth noting of is that if a Member State is outvoted in the adoption process of a directive it may purposely drag its feet over the implementation process, in such a ...read more.

Conclusion

1833 4Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, C-484/04 Opinion of Advocate General Kokott, 9/03/2006, part IV, para 21 5 Case 6/64, [1964] CMLR 425, 593 6 Enchelmaeir Stefan, Supremacy and Direct Effect of European Community Law Reconsidered or the Use and Abuse of Political Science for Jurisprudence, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 23, No. 2, p293 7 Spence David, The European Commission, 3rd Edition, John Harper Publishing, 2006, Ch 19, p512 8 http://www.eiro.eurofound.europa.eu/1998/05/feature/uk9805123f.html, Hall M., Government acts on EU working time Directive, : 28-05-1998 9More Gillian and Shaw Jo, New Legal Dynamics of European union, 2nd edition, Clarendon press, 1995, p324 10 Anna Pollert, The unorganised worker: The decline in collectivism and new hurdles to individual employment rights, Industrial Law Journal, September, 2005, p 222 11 Ibid. p 223 12 Case C-188/89, [1990] ECR I - 3313 13 Collins Lawrence, European community law in the United Kingdom, 4th Edition, Butterworths, 1990 14 Lasok K P E, Law and the Institutions of the European Union, 7th Edition, Butterworths, 2001, chapter 14, p372 15 http://www.etuc.org/a/504, European Trade Union Confederation, The working time directive 16 Above n.9 , p 323 17 Above n.2 p 374 18 Brealey Mark and Hoskins Mark, Remedies in EC Law, 2nd Edition, Sweet and Maxwell, 1998, Chapter 12, p265 19 Case 382, [1994] I - ECR 2435 20 Skidmore Paul, Enforcement of Rights to Worker Representation in Community Law, Modern Law Review, Vol. 58, No. 5, p745 21 Hartley T.C., The Foundations of European Community Law, 4th Edition, Oxford University Press, 1998, Ch 10, p309 22 Case28/67, Molkerei-Zentral Westfalen v Hauptzollamt Paderborn, [1968] ECR 143 23 Weatherill Stephen, Law and Integration in the EU, Oxford Clarendon Press, 1995, ch4, p98 24 Case 29/84, [1985] ECR 1661, [1986] 3 CMLR 579 25 Above n.2, p380 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree European Union Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree European Union Law essays

  1. Predatory pricing strategies in the European union: A case for legal reform.

    clients, seen in totality, unveiled a detailed plan on the part of that company to destroy ECS, its primary competitor in the flour additives and organic peroxides markets. The Commission also indicated that, whenever low pricing may be explained in different ways, it is the intent of the defendant alone that will decide whether this pricing is predatory or not.

  2. Critically evaluate the impact of the E.U. Directive on Copyright in an Information Society, ...

    Also, academics tend to publish their work, often on websites, and in cases where the research concerned (incidentally or otherwise) the circumvention of a technical protection measure applied to computer programs, the publication would make the researcher liable to prosecution.

  1. Discussion of the quotation from Advocate General Jacobs in Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v. ...

    In 1991 the strict application of the Plaumann test softened slightly when the ECJ held In Extramet 21 that a company was "individually concerned" despite the fact that the original complainant in the case was involved in the same business (it was the main competitor)

  2. How far has the creation of a single market in goods resulted in the ...

    The Commission felt it provided consumers opportunity to "exercise their prejudices"48. This is arguably a very significant challenge to member states commercial activities and the measures they introduce. The Commission is interfering and overriding domestic measures that have little baring on free movement of goods.

  1. EU Law - age discrimination and market access case studies.

    It was decided that if a product is produced lawfully in one Member State, it should be possible to sell it in any other Member State. Finally, in paragraph 8, the ECJ put forward what are known as the 'mandatory requirements', a list of justifications for Member States to use to defend their implementation of the measure in question.

  2. Critically discuss the proposition that the Treaty of Lisbon has completed the evolution of ...

    ensuring the correction of excessive deficit in the euro area Member States pursues the triple aim of (a) complementing the European semester with a common budgetary timeline aiming at better synchronizing the key steps in the preparation of national budgets; (b)

  1. EU - problem question

    to the ECJ. The success of the Commission in bringing an action against the UK will depend on the strength of UK's defence on grounds of national security. However, given that a similar case in Italy was decided in

  2. EU Law - Albatros Pool problem case. Mark and Sunita must be advised that ...

    The European Court is cognisant of the unfairness created by the disparity between horizontal and vertical effect and has established jurisprudence to address the issue and provide remedies for those who only have a right of action against a private entity.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work