• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Free movement of workers

Extracts from this document...


The Law of the European Union Assignment Bella, a UK national, has recently separated from her husband, Alonso, an Italian national and gone to seek a new life in Greece after taking her 15 year old son, David, with her. After a few months, Bella has spent a significant amount of her savings and begins to look for work. Over a period f time she applies for a number of positions but is unable to satisfy the language requirements. She begins to take drugs and David, who has been working part time to supplement their income, moves out into other accommodation. Bella is eventually arrested and charged with minor drug offences for which she is given a short custodial sentence. Meanwhile her husband has taken up an offer of employment in Germany and, at the end of the sentence Bella tries to enter Germany to effect reconciliation. She is refused entry because of her drug offences. In Greece David is found not to have a residence permit and is not allowed to obtain one as he is not living with either of his parents. Please advise Bella and David. Nicholas Payne Group B Professor Nick Grief Student ID: 4150081 The scenario above involves one of the fundamental four freedoms of European law; the free movement of persons Arts. 39-42 of the EC Treaty provide that citizens of EU member states shall have the general right to move freely within the EU to seek and take up offers of employment. ...read more.


This states that a Union citizen shall have the right of residence for a period of up to 3 months without any conditions or formalities other than the necessity, like in article 5, to simply hold a passport or valid ID card. However there are restrictions under Article 14: retention of residence9, which can refuse residence if a citizen becomes an unreasonable burden upon the social assistance system of the state. One must question the nature of Bella's offence and in particular look to the word 'minor' however this is a matter of national law discretion. In UK law the immigration policy of those with previous convictions is that 'refusal of leave of entry should normally follow unless admission is justified for strongly compassionate reasons'10 The European Commission have clarified their position on this by explicitly stating that 'Previous criminal convictions in themselves do not constitute grounds for restricting the right to move and reside freely.'11 They feel that expulsion is a very harsh interference with a person's life. However it all relies on a matter of public policy within the German legal framework as the case of Commission v Spain12 highlights as E.U law 'enables member states to prohibit nationals of other member states or their spouses who are national of third countries from entering their territory on grounds of public policy.'13 If Germany have in fact achieved what the Treaties set out to do by forming common policies with ...read more.


David, using the test in Levin satisfies E.U worker status and as mentioned is working to improve living conditions, become self-sufficient and is of benefit to their economy. Under art.14 which clearly outlines when a Union citizen can be refused residence is when the individual becomes an 'unreasonable burden on the social assistance of the host member state'19 David he is not a burden as he is clearly just trying to make a living. With regards to the permit under the Directive 2004/38 where a worker is employed for a period exceeding three months but not exceeding one year, the host State must issue him with a temporary residence permit whose validity may be limited to the expected duration of the employment. On the basis he should be granted a temporary permit at the very least whilst as he continues in his aim to become self-sufficient. Word Count 1499 1 Article 39(1) EC Treaty 2 Article 39(2) EC Treaty 3http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/free_movement/job_en.htm 4 Art 2(2) Directive 2004/38 5 Netherlands v Reed (Case 59/85) [1986] ECR 1283 6 Diatta v Land Berlin (Case 267/83) [1985] ECR 567 7 Art 5 Directive 2004/38 8 Art. 6 Directive 2004/38 9 Art 14 Directive 2004/38 10 Http://www.bia.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitecontent/documents/policyandlaw/IDIs/idischapter9/section2/section2.pdf?view=Binary 11 http://ec.europa.eu/youreurope/nav/en/citizens/living/restrictions-and-limitations/public-policy-or-security/index_en.html 12 Commission v Spain (Case C-503/03) 13 Commission v Spain (Case C-503/03) 14 Lawrie Blum (Case 66/85) [1986] ECR 2121 15 Unlocking E.U Law: Storey and Turner 16 Levin (Case 53-81) [1982] ECR 1035 17 Levin (Case 53-81) [1982] ECR 1035 18 Kempf (Case 139/85) [1986] ECR 1741 19 Art. 14 Directive 2004/38 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree European Union Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree European Union Law essays

  1. Predatory pricing strategies in the European union: A case for legal reform.

    wholesale and retail, manufacturing and distribution), or entails considerable expenses, or involves assets that are not transferable from other markets, recoupment might be expected with relative certainty. Finally, where demand is thriving, prospects for recoupment are good, whereas under conditions of declining demand and excess capacity, such prospects are poor.

  2. EU Freedom of Establishment. In this essay I will discuss the definition of establishment ...

    From 1980 to 1989, he was an associate member of a chamber and no complaints ever emerged during this time. In 1989 he set up his own chambers and most of his business involved non-contentious work. 65% of his turnover was representing German-speakers and 30% of his turnover was representing

  1. Critically evaluate the impact of the E.U. Directive on Copyright in an Information Society, ...

    The problems for musical copyright owners are apparent but with software and loop-holes enabling the circumvention of the internet copyright laws, their rights over their work have been impinged. Although Gnutella networks may provide an indirect source of finance and thus indirect 'fair compensation' for the right-holder, it weakens any

  2. How far has the creation of a single market in goods resulted in the ...

    EC.87 To fully understand the rule i.e. deciding what is incompatible, the Commission must consider the definition portion by portion. (a) "Any aid granted by a Member State or through State resources" A State resource was declared to have been used in the case of SFEI v La Poste

  1. Critically discuss the proposition that the Treaty of Lisbon has completed the evolution of ...

    However, due to these to treaty future changes, it would be irresponsible to come to the conclusion that the EU legal system has completed its evolution. 7 Conclusion: 7.1 Over the last 45 years or so the ECJ has repeatedly went 'way beyond the textual stipulations of the treaties leaving

  2. EU - problem question

    whose is lack of remedy is the failure of Member States, in this case the UK. The Francovich case is an important one for our purposes. An Italian scheme to provide minimum complication for workers on the insolvency of their employers was found to be in breach of a requirement under Directive 80/987.

  1. EU Law

    UK from as far back as 2001 and it required the childcare provisions Jane is seeking to rely on. Given that Jane's matter relates to this Decision, this first requirement is satisfied. Secondly, whether a reference can be made will depend on whether or not the matter has been adjudicated in a court or tribunal.

  2. EU Law - Albatros Pool problem case. Mark and Sunita must be advised that ...

    This is an important principle because it recognises there are different cultures, religions and languages within the EU, which must be respected. However principles of equality and justice cannot be contravened on the grounds of non-compliance Direct Effect/Indirect Effect& Proportionality: The Concept of Direct Effect within EU Law: This discussion will consider the type of law that the ECJ follows.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work