Discussing the short story "Turned" by Charlotte Perkins Gilman.
"TURNED" In the short story "Turned" by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, the author use techniques that make the reader act sympathetically or unsympathetically towards the character and sometime the author will change the reader attitude towards the character for example someone might be good at the start of the story that make the reader to act sympathetically but then in the middle of the story the character become bad that will make the reader change their attitude toward the character to do this the writer uses the following techniques characterization, Plot, Narrative In the start of the story the author position the reader to act sympathetically towards Gerta by telling how she feels, she was crying in her poor furnished room about something that we do not know yet and the writer position us to act to be more sympathy towards her because in Passage three Mrs. Marroner said, "I never saw anyone so docile, it is a perfection in a servant, but almost a defect in character. But then in passage 5 we know that Gerta is pregnant and we know that the father of the baby is Mr. Marroner that makes us to act un sympathetically to her because we think that she's a cheap girl that want to sleep with anyone. But because Mrs. Marroner is going to kick her out of the house we feel bit sympathy to her and when Mrs. Marroner realize that it wasn't Gerta's fault it was actually Mr. Marroner
Ronald Dworkin and his interpretation of natural law and positivism.
To properly assess the statement in question, we must first examine the elements of both natural law and legal positivism. Thomas Aquinas in Summa Theologica1 explains his view of natural law as being universal in nature as it emanates from rationale held by us as human beings; therefore we all share this reasoning. Aquinas defines positive law as being determined by natural law for the common good. It is binding on humans as a collective conscience as it is inherently just. The concept of law being just is crucial to positivism. If a law is unjust it is not regarded as law. A law cannot be produced in name only according to positivists. Ronald Dworkin, a contemporary American legal philosopher is most notorious for his theory on natural law and legal positivism. This theory is often described as 'the third way' and is Dworkin's response2 to HLA Hart's theory on legal positivism. For the basis of properly analysing Dworkin's position relating to the law, we must examine Hart's analysis of the concept of law. In his book, The Concept of Law3, Hart argues for a set of primary rules of obligation and secondary rules. The essential secondary rule is Hart's rule of recognition, which sets out the criteria for identifying laws within specific legal systems. Hart describes this rule '...to say that a given rule is valid is to recognize it as passing all the tests provided by
Essay on how judges decide cases
"Every judgment I write is a lie. I will repeat that statement: every judgment I write is a lie. This was the opening sentence of a lecture that I gave to students at the University of Toronto some years back, and, as I said in the Introduction, it captured their attention. . . I explained to my bemused audience that as a new judge on the Constitutional Court I would always smile inwardly when first reading my judgments in print. The judgments told their story in such an orderly, clear, sequential narrative form. They would begin by stating the issue raised, and then set out the history of the litigation and elucidate the specific questions to be determined. Next they would outline the relevant legal principles involved, apply them to the facts and arrive at the appropriate conclusion. . . . What produced my amusement was the knowledge that my judgments had in fact emerged from an inchoate - even chaotic - mental firmament quite different from that suggested by their ultimate assured expression. Mixed in with the formal logic there had invariably been an enormous amount of random intuitive searching and a vast element of unruly, free-floating sensibility. . . I wanted the students to understand that legal writing was not simply or even primarily about connecting pure, rational legal propositions together to produce a forward-moving train of thought that arrived at a
What are the strengths and weaknesses of New Labour's approach to youth crime?
What are the strengths and weaknesses of New Labour's approach to youth crime? Youth crime has been suggested as being "synonymous" with the problem of crime as a whole. The youth of today have been categorised as being "dangerous, deviant, barbaric, troublesome, anti-social and irresponsible" (Munice, 1999;172). With such assumptions it has been perceived that the crimes committed by youths have drastically risen and this it appears has forced the Government into a devising a much stricter social policy (Nacro, 2002). New Labour has entered into the Government in 1997, with a wider range of policies to tackle the supposed disorder of youth crime, with the introduction of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. The government were much more focused on being "tough on the causes of crime" and forcing the delinquents to be responsible for their actions by facing up to the crimes that they have committed (Fionda, 1999; 37). However there has been much debate on the effectiveness and fairness of such enforcement. The extent to which the youth have been involved with criminal activity and the way it has been dealt with by the current Government can therefore be assessed. Before any kind of assessment can be made on the actions of the Labour Government, the extent to which crime has been committed by the youth and its nature, firstly need to be established. The Home Office Criminal
This essay will outline the main features of the labelling perspective and assess its contribution to the study of crime and deviance.
The Development Of Criminological Theory The Labelling Perspective This essay will outline the main features of the labelling perspective and assess its contribution to the study of crime and deviance. The labelling perspective has had a significant influence upon the research of crime and deviance since the 1960s, when focus shifted away from the traditional research into the causes of crime, and moved towards concentrating on the process of criminalization. (Coleman and Norris, 2000). Therefore the labelling approach is not concerned with the causes of crime but with the effects of being labelled and secondary deviance. (Croall, 1998). As a rejection of positivism, the labelling perspective is radical in the way that it locates the cause of crime to the main institutions of society, and also because it is ironic and contradicts itself. (Young, 1997). Plummer (1979) summed up the labelling theory as 'being concerned with nature, origins, application and consequences of deviancy labels.' (Coleman and Norris, 2000: 72). In a famous quote by Howard Becker (1963) he implies that a deviant act does not exist, an action can only become deviant as a result of people classifying and observing it as a deviant act: social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitutes deviance, and by applying those rules to particular people and labelling
Human's Rights in China - What are human rights and how are they being violated?
Human's Rights in China Issue #1 What are human rights and how are they being violated? Example1: From the Universal Declaration of Human Rights from the U.N - a common standard of achievement for all people and all nations, to the end for all people and all nations to the end that every individual and every organ of society keeping the Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, nation and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance both among the people of members states themselves and the people of territories under their jurisdiction. Example#2: Human Rights Watch urges the UN Commission to adopt a strong resolution censuring China for widespread violation on human rights and calling for significant improvements. In Tibet, Human right abuse remains strong- Detentions and sentencing for pro-independence activities, beatings and torture to prisoners, and government interference with religious activity, just to name a few. One issue where trade and human rights overlap is the emergence of the Internet in China, where more than 60 sets of draconian regulations have been imposed by the government to control its use. They censor foreign news and mandate strict supervision of chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards to prevent
Asylum Seekers and Refugees
Asylum Seekers and Refugees This paper will contain a detailed analysis of the current perceptions surrounding Asylum seekers and Refugees in Great Britain. I will examine these issues from a structural, institutional, cultural and individual perspective. I will then discuss the 'myths' surrounding Asylum seekers and Refugees. In doing this I will make reference to the current legislation that has been put into place for asylum seekers and refugees. As student studying Social Work, the issue of Refugees and Asylum seekers is paramount to my profession. I will draw on my own experiences and observations of this controversial issue. The 1951 United Nations Convention Relating to Refugees, defined a refugee as someone: * who has a well-founded fear of persecution for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion: * is outside the country they belong to or normally reside in, and * is unable or unwilling to return home for fear of persecution. The Convention was drafted in the context of the millions of Refugees in post-war Europe, and only applied to European nationals. In 1967 the UN protocol extended this to cover any person, anywhere in the World, at any time. While someone is waiting for their application to be considered by the Government, they are known as an "Asylum seeker". (Donnellan, C. (2002), p5, The
My aims are to discuss the legislation and how it can be implemented into a welfare setting and how difficult it can be to implement the law.
My aims are to discuss the legislation and how it can be implemented into a welfare setting and how difficult it can be to implement the law. I will look at legislation and the mind field it can be, discrimination, how employers do it without realising, how our work place's can and should be non-judgemental. I will look at individualism, client choice, and look at social perception and stereotyping. I work within a community project, the project has been set up to relieve the effects of poverty and social deprivation within the county borough of Conwy by collecting unwanted furniture, household goods and domestic appliances and redistributing them at low cost to individuals and families on low income throughout the county borough. The project provides work placements and training to individuals from the disadvantaged labour market. The objectives are to work within a local and national framework designed to promote social inclusion. To help relieve socio-economic problems caused by debt burden on low income families. To give real work experience, an individual structured training plan and job search skills all within a supportive environment to unemployed individuals, empowering them and helping them access unsubsidised sustainable employment within the local job market. The training placements are for fixed term 4 and 6-month contracts. The project must endeavour to
Is The Need To Prevent Individuals Harming Other Human Beings The Only Sound Justification For Government Action?
Is The Need To Prevent Individuals Harming Other Human Beings The Only Sound Justification For Government Action? Modern society invariably involves a system of laws that sets out the rights and duties bestowed upon the individuals that make up the society. By its nature a system of laws is restrictive, as it puts limits on what people are allowed to do and / or gives guidelines laying out what an individual must do. Individual liberty is therefore compromised but the question is - how far can individual liberty be compromised? This essay will explore the liberal answers to this question, a view championed by John Stuart Mill, and evaluate the effectiveness of the harm principle when applied to both practical situations and ethical theory and will attempt to show that government intervention can stretch beyond the harm principle. This Liberal idea of the harm principle is put best by J. S. Mill who believes that the state should not prevent people from exercising their individual liberties so long as they do not harm other individuals. "The sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self protection. That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either
Does Law limit or enhance democracy
Jurisprudence Does the Rule of Law Enhance or Limit Democracy? Introduction 2-3 What Comprises a Democracy 3-4 Models of Democracy Disputed 4-6 The Relevance of the Rule of Law within a Democracy 6-7 Conclusion: 8-9 Bibliography 9-10 Introduction The importance of understanding what form legitimate government should take is, according to Lock and Hobbes, in order to realise the "conditions for security, peace and freedom." ("Held 78) Although the concept of democracy has existed for thousands of years it has only recently reasserted itself within the United Kingdom's contemporary governmental domain. During the fifteenth to the eighteenth century "two different forms of political regime were dominant in Europe: 'the absolute' monarchies of France, Prussia, Austria...and the 'constitutional' monarchies and republics of England." (Held 70) Paradoxically, from this absolutist regime emerged a democratic government since "as the state's administrative centres became more powerful...the increase in administrative power increased the state's dependence on cooperative forms and social relations". (Held72) This founding of democracy legitimizes Locke's concern that the democratic government is egoistic because the concentration of power is focused more on the state than the citizen. Thus, despite the ostensible interactions between citizen and state "there is no