• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The democratic deficit is a concept created by the euro sceptics regarding the European Union and the alleged lack of democracy within its institutions.

Extracts from this document...


EU Law Essay Student Number: 0900091 The democratic deficit is a concept created by the euro sceptics regarding the European Union and the alleged lack of democracy within its institutions. In the opinion of EU critics the big problem is inaccessibility of the institutions and high level of complexity of the legislative procedures and their methods of operating. The EU is a very unique organisation. It is not a federal state, yet not just an international organisation such as in example United Nations. Compared to an ideally democratic Nation-State the EU is less democratic and thus has a democratic deficit. However compared to the other organisations like the World Bank or the World Trade Organisations the EU has a democratic surplus. One of the biggest problems with the democratic issues regarding the EU is low interest in the EU and its politics, and the fact that turnout in elections is constantly decreasing. Apart from that there are also the issues of the divide between politicians and the general population on European integration, technocratic decision-making process, and the activism of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). There is no consensus whether the Lisbon Treaty increases the democratic deficit in the European Union or contrary to this thesis makes this issue a smaller problem. ...read more.


It is rather strange to ask the ordinary citizen to approve or reject a new treaty which is based on older provisions and all the pre-existing measures on which the process of integration has been based since the creation of the European Community Act 1972. In my opinion the referendum should concern exclusively the new provisions of this treaty (assuming that all the previous measures are already agreed). If it also concerns the provisions which are already in force it should give the citizens the possibility of voting for the withdrawal from the EU if they are not satisfied with its objectives and legislation. If the subject of the referendum is not clear it gives a huge possibility for all the demagogues to deprecate not just the new legislative elements, but also the ones which were discussed thousands of times before, like European social model or the competition rules, which are functioning satisfactorily in the opinion of the majority of Member States. Apart from that, referendums can be criticised as populist. As I mentioned before the regular citizens are not able to understand the complexity of the treaties, and the scope of changes they make after the rectification. ...read more.


The role of the European Parliament increases significantly with every Treaty amendment, but some of the areas seem to be left untouched by the legislature even when criticised6. In my opinion the law making process within the EU is transparent enough for the member countries citizens as long as they are truly interested in the topic. Since the enactment of the citizen's initiative it is easy for interest groups to express the opinions about the legal system, or apply for the consideration of proposed modifications to it. Thanks to the various internet and paper sources it is fast and easy to access all the legislation documents concerned with policy making including the debates of the Council of Ministers. All the actions taken by the EU organisations are under continuous supervision of European Court of Justice and member countries courts to ensure the accountability of policy makers within the EU. However before trying to solve all of these problems we need to take into attention the fact that EU is "one of a kind" organisation. It has got unique structure and functioning, incomparable to anything which has existed before. Therefore, even though the EU still has to fulfil some of the requirements of the democratic legitimacy, the way they must be applied cannot resemble any classical, both national and international models. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree European Union Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree European Union Law essays

  1. Predatory pricing strategies in the European union: A case for legal reform.

    prevail, may find it profitable to adopt predatory pricing in those markets where they face vigorous competition, while subsidising their losses by charging more in other markets, where they are already powerful and do not face substantial competition. Predatory pricing strategies, as conceived, may destroy those of the dominant firm's

  2. EU Freedom of Establishment. In this essay I will discuss the definition of establishment ...

    The EC Directive 75/362 relating to training for GPs did not require GPs to undergo training additional to the original (three year) qualification. 6.9 Progress of negotiating these Directives were very slow-Architect's Directive (Directive 85/384)

  1. Critically evaluate the impact of the E.U. Directive on Copyright in an Information Society, ...

    If there is complete harmonisation of copyright laws, once the issue has been brought into its own jurisdiction, the enforcement of it will be much easier to achieve. However, it is infinitely impossible to police the internet due to the difficulty in tracing the infringers involved.

  2. Discuss the rules of Competition law and how the European Commission enforces these Laws.

    This comes under Regulation 17/62. The Commission after receiving a complaint can start an investigation and may enter the premises of the undertaking to collect all information that it may require for the investigation. See the case of National Panasonic (uk) Ltd v Commission29. This information can be documents and it can also ask questions.

  1. How far has the creation of a single market in goods resulted in the ...

    Such prohibitions or restrictions shall not, however, constitute a means of arbitary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between member states." This provides six objective grounds for derogation from A28 and 29 are provided. These are construed very narrowly by the courts63.

  2. Critically discuss the proposition that the Treaty of Lisbon has completed the evolution of ...

    Consequently, a year later, the Stauder11 case provided the Court with the opportunity to clarify that fundamental rights form part of the general principles of Union law. Later on, in Internationale Handelsgesellschaft12, the Court explained that, despite being 'inspired by constitutional traditions common to the MSs,' the protection of fundamental rights should be ensured within the Community legal system.

  1. EU - problem question

    the interpretation of the statutes of bodies established by an act of the Council, where those statutes so provide. Where such a question is raised before any court or tribunal of a Member State, that court or tribunal may, if it considers that a decision on the question is necessary

  2. EU Law - Albatros Pool problem case. Mark and Sunita must be advised that ...

    The fact that it is aimed to benefit a technically different product is irrelevant in the eyes of EC law.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work