• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The EU is 'fundamentally undemocratic', discuss.

Extracts from this document...


The Foundations of European Union Law 'A major flaw in the EU institutional structure is that it is fundamentally undemocratic' Discuss. The European Union was previously known as the European Community, which was created after World War II to unite the nations of Europe economically to avoid another way. The EU is a framework of twenty-five countries sharing; institutions, policies and a universal currency. Ever since 1979 their constituents have voted all members of the European parliament in. Prior to this however, their own governments selected members. They named themselves parliament, even though the 'Treaty of Rome' referred to them as an assembly. Beneath Art 189, the European parliament is made up of "representatives of the peoples of the states brought together in community" 1. Only in 1986 did the states officially accept the name European parliament. The European parliament is the only organisation that represents the citizen and this is absolutely fundamental for introducing principles of democracy for the citizen. Currently in the EU all legislative actions start from the commission and there are three months major forms, the original consultation. "The co-operation procedure introduced by the SEA and the conciliation and veto procedure, also known as the co-decision procedure."2, established by the Treaty on European Union The term 'fundamentally undemocratic' states how there is a lack of democracy in the policy areas of the European Union. This can also be known as a 'democratic deficit'. It is simply down to a matter of opinion if the European Union is undemocratic or not. ...read more.


The legislative processes are very complex, this means that it is nearly impossible for even specialists to understand, the public would be unable. Also, most of the decision-making processes take place behind closed doors. Even the election process of the EU can be perceived as undemocratic, the party 'list' method caused controversy and there is a strong argument that the system is largely undemocratic. The choice of candidates for the list is done by the party hierarchy, the same people also choose the order in which they appear on the ballot, these factors could effect the chances of the candidates being elected or not. The research I have made whilst studying the EU institutions (specifically the study of the democracy of the EU) shows that most authors who discuss this matter are in agreement that the main problem of the democratic situation is that the main problem of the democratic situation is that the 'European parliament has not got wide-range rights to control the common institutions (the council and the commission)'. For development reasons the national governments are needed to make all the wider field of decision-making. The national government need to finalise on decisions by importance of national interests and the citizens' interests. E.g. Terrorism or natural disaster. These democratic issues means that, between the EU and the European citizens, the citizens do not know why they need the European Union, or why they are members of the Union, they feel as if the EU is too distant from them6. ...read more.


Perhaps the Parliament could be given a greater opportunity not only to propose but also to enact legislation. To achieve this there will have to be a greater affinity between the European Community as an institution and its citizens as MEPs can hardly be described as currently acting upon a democratic mandate when electoral turnout is so low. This could steadily be achieved over time or it could be accelerated with a 'Bill of Rights' or constitution. It is, however, worth stating that although there is a 'democratic deficit' in the EC's legal system, it has come a long way in a short time. At the same time, structural changes could reduce the democratic problems until the mandate of the European Parliament gains greater legitimacy through larger turnouts at European elections. It could also be reduced by opening up the decision making process and by maintaining the powers of the intergovernmental institutions, mainly the Council of Ministers. The Council of Ministers is accountable to the European citizens and is best placed to protect their interests. Until the European Unions Identity can be achieved along with the greater support for a more powerful and closer union, the autonomy of the supranational institutions should be kept to a minimum. Bibliography Schmidt. Vivien. "Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities" 2006. First Edition. Oxford University Press Siedentop. Larry. "Democracy in Europe" 2001. Penguin Group. Connor, Tim. Lecture Notes and Course workbook 2007-2008 www.europarl.co.uk Chryssochoou, D "EU Democracy and the Democratic Deficit" 2003. Oxford University Press. www.bbc.co.uk www.thetimes.co.uk 1 Westlaw. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree European Union Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree European Union Law essays

  1. The democratic deficit is a concept created by the euro sceptics regarding the European ...

    Every member state should receive the same level of attention from the various EU organisations as any other associated country. The citizens are directly represented by the European Parliament. The Treaty states that all the decisions taken by the EU should be taken as openly and as closely as it is possible to the citizen.

  2. The Luxembourg Compromise is, in fact, an agreement in case very important national interests ...

    Moreover, a minister is likely to be of greater influence and authority in arguing the interests at stake, thus maybe able to gain a more favourable outcome than the non-minister. It is the use of the veto at COREPER or the working groups though which raise the greatest controversy.

  1. Predatory pricing strategies in the European union: A case for legal reform.

    [FN22] Had it examined each scheme in its appropriate market context, however, the Commission would have concluded on their true impact on competition, and hence European integration. The Elements of Predatory Pricing: A Brief Economic Appraisal and a Proposed Standard of Analysis Although American scholarly literature on predatory pricing has

  2. EU Freedom of Establishment. In this essay I will discuss the definition of establishment ...

    5.10 In Thieffry (1977) a Belgian national, who obtained a law degree at a Belgian university, which was recognised as equivalent by the University of Paris, proposed to train for the French bar. He was refused on the grounds that he did not possess a French law degree.

  1. Critically evaluate the impact of the E.U. Directive on Copyright in an Information Society, ...

    What service providers should do is investigate the complaints of copyright infringement and then remove or deny access to the infringing material while they investigate, If condemned, the used or company accounts should be immediately cancelled and all the other service providers should be informed about the issue.

  2. How far has the creation of a single market in goods resulted in the ...

    How the courts will proceed is unclear, perhaps using a rule of reason as with Cassis and indistinctly applicable measures?56 Exports A.2957 deals with Exports. It states that "Quantitative restrictions on exports and MEQRs shall be prohibited between member states". The same principles as A.28 apply with one important exception.

  1. Critically discuss the proposition that the Treaty of Lisbon has completed the evolution of ...

    3.2 Numerous arguments have been offered in support of EU accession to the ECHR. First and foremost, EU accession has been championed on the ground that it would be symbolically important as it would send a positive message stressing the EU commitment to fundamental rights protection internally as well as externally.

  2. EU Law - Albatros Pool problem case. Mark and Sunita must be advised that ...

    An example of the restrictive attitude to the protection of health and life of humans, animals or plants derogation can be found in the case Commission v United Kingdom. Further particulars regarding the profile of the market and other conditions are needed in order to arrive at cogent advice on this matter.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work