• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The Royal Prerogative remains a significant source of constitutional law which is largely immune from scrutiny by the courts."

Extracts from this document...


"The Royal Prerogative remains a significant source of constitutional law which is largely immune from scrutiny by the courts." The question here is, do we agree with the view that the Royal Prerogative is immune from scrutiny by the courts, and whether it remains a significant source of constitutional law. In addressing this view, the first point to consider is the definitional controversy of the term, 'royal prerogative' and its origin, then consider its nature, modern position and its significance within the UK Constitution, and finally, whether or not the royal prerogative is immune from scrutiny by the courts. Under the UK Constitution, all actions of government are undertaken in the name of the Crown. Historically, the term, 'royal prerogative' has been applied to those special rights and privileges, which the King had as a feudal lord. There are two schools of thought on the definitional controversy of the term. Blackstone advanced the first 'narrow' or 'restrictive' interpretation. Blackstone defines the prerogative in his Commentaries1 as: .....that special pre-eminence which the King hath over and above all other persons, and out of the ordinary course of the common law, in right of his regal dignity. ...read more.


of the Act had not replaced the prerogative power of the SoS to maintain law and order. In some statutes, the prerogative power is expressly preserved, for example, the Immigration Act 1971, s33 (5).12 The prerogative is divided into that which is exercised by ministers (in the name of the Crown), the 'political prerogative' and that which is personal to the monarch, 'personal prerogative'. While regal powers are exercised in the name of the Crown by the government of the day, the Crown nevertheless retains important residual power. Of these, the dissolution of Parliament and the appointment of Prime Minister are the most significant. 'There still remains the prerogative notion that the Crown never dies and can do no wrong'13, thus placing the Queen outside the jurisdiction of the courts and guaranteeing immunity from prosecution in her own courts. The political prerogative is usually sub-classified into Executive, Judicial and Legislative prerogatives. The Executive prerogative relates to international and national affairs, covering matters such as: disposition of the armed forces, conduct of the realm in time war and emergency, declaring war and peace, issuing passports, making treaties and the general conduct of external relations, including recognising foreign states and the consequential privileges and immunities flowing therefrom.14 The Judicial prerogative include that of mercy (power to issue pardon for offences) ...read more.


The prerogative seems not to be subject to a satisfactory degree of accountability, either through Parliament or the courts. There have been a number of proposals for the reform of the royal prerogative by academics such as Professor Munro and Professor Brazier. Former Labour MP, Tony Benn campaigned for the abolition of the Royal Prerogative in the 1990's, arguing that all governmental powers exercised on the advice of the Prime Minister and Cabinet should be subject to parliamentary scrutiny and require parliamentary approval. In conclusion, it is clear the view that the royal prerogative is immune from scrutiny by the courts, as the citation of the different types of prerogative powers and the reference to decided cases illustrate, is not quite accurate. However, saying that the royal prerogative is not immune from judicial scrutiny would be inaccurate, as the personal prerogative powers of the Queen is at least one element of the royal prerogative that supports the view above. It would be more accurate to say that royal prerogative powers within the UK are immune from judicial scrutiny to a certain extent, depending upon the nature of the power, not their source. WORD COUNT: 2,032. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Public Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Public Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Illustrating your answer with case law, assess the extent to which the exercise of ...

    5 star(s)

    The government had right to terminate these rights by way of prerogative, and they argued that workers involved in matters of national security maybe denied such rights. The GCHQ case, established two significant principles, firstly, the royal prerogative was as reviewable as powers exercised under statute.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    This paper will deal with the common law legal system as a legal transplant, ...

    4 star(s)

    can accommodate local needs to a great extent, and as such it is ideal for such borrowing. Conclusion: Common Law as a Legal Transplant The value of the common law as a legal transplant is in that it is able to jump-start newer legal systems, allowing fledgling systems to benefit from years of legal development.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Prerogative powers are very important source of UK Constitution dealing with issues such as ...

    3 star(s)

    In case of foreign affairs: declaration of war and peace, making treaties, recognition of foreign states, the accreditation and reception of diplomats, annexation and cessation of territories, deployment of the armed forces on operations abroad. In 1611 Case of Proclamation5 established the basic principle about determining the prerogative.

  2. Public Law Assignment

    Rights Act 199841 that creates a new point of constitutional balance between parliamentary and judicial supremacy, and the Scotland Act; that provides the potential to acquire a political authority in matters of Scottish law,42 and as stated by Jowell [2006] PL 571, the discussion by the 9 judges in Jackson

  1. Public Law - Problem Question - Judicial Review

    Legere points out that the 'sufficient interest' test is a "relatively low hurdle" for potential claimants to overcome,21 and Grekos points out that the general approach of the Administrative Court is a liberal one.22 Consequently, it is submitted that in this scenario, the parties have standing. Roman Antiquities Foundation (RAF)

  2. Public law and Administration problem question

    In assessing standing the approach varies between, types of organisations and individuals claims. National Federation Of Self Employed And Small Businesses Ltd9 was the first important decision on the test, Lord Diplock referred to the desirability of a 'single public-minded taxpayer' being able to challenge the validity of unlawful administrative action10.

  1. Public Law Essay

    No plea of secrecy can be made to her as she is subject to the Official Secrets Act.19 Judicial review and litigation in general are expensive and usually disproportionate to the amount at stake.20 The losing party usually pays for both, his own and the successful party's costs.21 The Ombudsman

  2. Describe, citing and discussing relevant case-law, the manner in which the judiciary controls the ...

    offence and that the King only enjoyed the prerogatives that the law of the land permitted him?[11] holding that the courts may review the scope and type of prerogative thus limiting the scope of royal prerogative powers. Lord Parker had previously commented in The Zamora that ?The idea that the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work