• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lecture X: Symbolism in Dreams. Through a psychoanalytic framework, analyse any one of Freud's Introductory Lectures.

Extracts from this document...


Lecture X: Symbolism in Dreams From the title alone it can be inferred, according to the narration, that symbols can be found within dreams but these are only symbolic, a substitution for what the dreams actually represent. For something to be symbolic, it requires a referential counterpart of something other than itself. Even at a semiotic level, to borrow from Saussurean linguistics, the sign is only ever symbolic of the signified. This can only ever be symbolic because the intelligibility of a sign system is grounded by its conventionality and the arbitrary link between a sign and its referent. This is exposed in the numerous different words for dog (where one version does not hold exclusive validity) and the fact that meanings change over time; signs no longer become symbolic of their once signified. This outline is important here, for the term symbolism disrupts the nexus between sign and referent. The fact that these signs within the dream are ?symbolic? suggests that they are a substitution, to use Freud?s formulation that he uses throughout the lectures, for yet a further stage in the chain of signification. The opening line, which declares, ?we have found? (line 1 ? emphasis added) claims that more than one person is implicated in this interpretation. The ?we? claim to have found ?the distortions in dreams? (line 2). The word ?distortion? implies that there is standard basal measurement from which the dreams distort and the ?we? claim to able to recognise this deviation. The distortion leads to an ?interfering with their understanding of them [symbolism in dreams]? (line 2). Thus far, the narration has not explicated what is at stake in the use of the word ?understanding?. The fact that there is a distortion in a dream and that the ?we? are able to measure this variable suggests that the dream which they interpret the ?distortion? from would need to be stable in order to measure any variance. ...read more.


In the exceptional cases where ?nothing occurs to a person under analysis? (line 16), for this does not happen ?as often as he asserts? (line 18) , the ?associations? can ?fail to emerge? (line 20) or alternatively, they can still emerge, but the associations do not ?give us what we expected from it? (line 20). The word ?association? here, given that the formula for being ?in a position to understand dreams? was outlined earlier, is an association, or in this case a lack thereof, between the ?manifest dream? and the ?latent dream-thoughts? (line 11). Moreover, these associations can emerge but still not ?give us what we expected from it? (line 21), which suggests that there is an expectation from these ?associations?. The presence of an association does not indicate that an ?idea can be extracted? (line 19) from it. Accordingly, the result of the associations which do not meet the narration?s ?expectations? cause the narration to ?admit? (line 14), which implies that his ?technique? (line 14) does not work on everybody. For these associations to provide any understanding of the symbolism in dreams, or at least to be ?in a position to understand? dreams, there is a criteria which these associations need to meet, hence the ?expectations? that the narration holds. However, these associations do offer a ?peculiar significance? (line 22) in psychoanalytic treatment where they would be rendered insignificant here. This is a piece of information ?with which we are not here concerned (line 23), yet we are still told, for it offers a contrastive model to this ?technique? of analysing the symbolism in dreams. It could be argued that the psychoanalytic treatment is determined ?peculiar? because it is derived epiphenomenally ? a product of an altogether different intention, but it proves useful under a different protocol. Not only does this ?peculiar significance? happen in psycho-analytic treatment, but it also happens in the interpretation of ?normal? (line 24) ...read more.


The formulation ?be in a position? is echoed from earlier: ?we would still not be in a position to understand dreams? (line 10 emphasis added). These conditions do not provide an understanding, but merely the right foundation from which an interpretation can be made. The narration outlines what this foundation would require: ?if we are acquainted with the ordinary dream-symbols, the dreamer?s personality, the circumstances in which he lives and the impressions which preceded the occurrence of the dream? (line 80, 81). Despite the fact that the dreamer would be equally handicapped in his knowledge of the translation of the symbol in the ancient, popular and the narration?s interpretation, the ?interpretation based on a knowledge of symbols is not a technique which can replace or compete with the associative one? (line 89). Accordingly, the narration warns us to ?not be led astray by this [interpreting the dream at sight]? (line 87). The ?interpretation based on a knowledge of symbols? can enrich an associative protocol, for it is regarded as a ?supplement? (line 90) to such enquiry, but is not a valid technique in and of itself, as it can only ?yield results which are only of use when introduced into it? (line 91 emphasis added). The fact that it can only be subsumed ?into? it suggests that the associative model is the larger whole in which substituted. The narration argues that the content of a dream is contingent on the events of the previous day: ?as a rule familiar with the events of the previous day, which were the instigators of the dream? (line 96). The word instigators suggests that the events of the previous day play the causative role in the dream. Moreover, ?the associations of the person you are analysing? will provide you, with what the narration refers to as the ?psychical situation? (line 98), which we can deduce as being an integral part of the associative technique, for it is result of the ?associations of the person you are analysing? (line 97). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Literary Criticism section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Literary Criticism essays

  1. The Analysis of the Dialogues in The Last Leaf Based on Cooperative Principle

    I'm tired of waiting. I'm tired of thinking. I want to turn loose my hold on everything, and go sailing down, down, just like one of those poor, tired leaves." (10) "Try to sleep," said Sue. "I must call Behrman up to be my model for the old hermit miner.

  2. The Yellow Wallpaper A feminist break though and interpretation of the symbolism

    The pattern on the wall paper when compared to gymnastics, it symbolizes her interests as a game and expresses a "contrast between the rigidly mannered and socially acceptable behavior of her husband (and less empathically, of Jennie)

  1. An Analysis of Rip Van Winkle Using Psychoanalytic and Archetypal Criticism

    Laziness is considered a sin, but Winkle doesn?t have a guilty conscience about it or the abandonment of his family, and he ?blames? his wife for the way he is. So, the contrast of his public and private life seems to be the same as the contrast between his impulses and the duty he has as a father/husband.

  2. What and when was the Harlem Renaissance? The Harlem Renaissance was more than ...

    Smith-Rosenberg, Carroll. Disorderly Conduct: Visions of Gender in Victorian America. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986. Southern, Eileen. Biographical Dictionary of Afro-American and African Musicians. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1982. Spencer, Jon Michael. The New n*****s and Their Music: The Success of the Harlem Renaissance.

  1. Angela Carters collection of stories, The Bloody Chamber, was published in 1979 and provides ...

    He is like the man in his engraving, "Reproof of Curiosity," who arouses himself by whipping a naked girl, only he is worse for being a murderer. The allusion to Eve suggests that inasmuch as the "b****y chamber" is a place of suffering and death for the other wives, it is one of learning and rebirth for the heroine.

  2. Christian Symbolism in Coleridges Rime of the Ancient Mariner

    Mary, a small Devonshire village in England. At the age of nine Coleridge was sent to a residential school for orphans, when his father died, and seemed determined to follow in his father?s footsteps and become an Anglican clergyman. It was at this school that Coleridge?s thirst for knowledge grew, and he later attended Cambridge University.

  1. The Great Gatsby and The American Dream

    Can?t you talk about crops or something?? (Fitzgerald 12). Another character?s ?American Dream? which is illustrated is George Wilson. His dream is to obtain wealth and be able to provide for his wife. We can see from the first conversation between George and Tom that he not well off.

  2. From Hobbit to Hero- Frodo's Quest as an Examplary Monomyth

    When saving Frodo from the Tower of Cirith Ungol, he continues to pursue the orcs frightening them with the light of 'Sting'. When Frodo already surrenders Sam does something next to impossible for a Hobbit "?Come, Mr. Frodo!? he cried.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work