INTRODUCTION

        A student at Eastern College had just graduated from college with a degree in education.  She was headed out into the world and wondering where her future would lead her.  She went and interviewed for a job as a teacher. This particular job was at a very good school and so was quite prestigious and had many good benefits as well.  She didn’t think that she would have a good chance of landing the job since there were over 300 applicants. But, amazingly, she was the one chosen out of all those applicants.  Needless to say, she was ecstatic.  

        She excitedly went and told one of her teachers, Tony Campolo, and asked him, “Aren’t you proud of me?”

        “No.” he said.

        Amazed she asked why he wasn’t proud of her for getting the job instead of the 299 other applicants.

        He replied, “You are telling me that you are going to be doing a job for which there are over 299 other qualified people.  Why would you want to be a teacher there when I can give you a job where if you don’t become the teacher, there won’t be a teacher?”

        She thought about that and decided not to accept the prestigious job for which she had been accepted.  Instead she became a teacher at one of Campolo’s schools in Haiti.

        His ideas of Christians being responsible to bring social justice wherever they see injustice has probably inspired me more than anything else to want to find ways that I can be of the best service in areas that need it the most.  I’ve got a long way to go in this area but, in this paper I’d like to outline a few ways that Christians and myself in particular can be useful in the communities in which they find themselves or in other countries.  But, before I do that, I would like to take a short look back at the education that I have received and write a short evaluation of it.

THE CHALLENGE OF EDUCATION

        In many ways I am probably a very lucky student because I have been able to study in three different countries: America (Walla Walla College), Singapore (Southeast Asia Union College), and South Africa (Helderberg College) To compare them is not really possible in my opinion.  Helderberg has every right to claim an equal level of education as Walla Walla or SAUC. I have worked hard as a student each of these places and been challenged by the teachers(one of them at Helderberg challenged me so much that I didn’t take showers a couple times because of so much reading)  At every school that you go to you have teachers that are excellent, average and so-so as well as some that are difficult and some that are easy(easy doesn’t necessarily mean low quality because in a couple of my easier classes they allowed a lot of discussion in the class which made me think more deeply about certain subjects).  I am thankful for the education that I have received.  It has opened my mind in many ways and I have a lot of respect for certain teachers at each of these schools.  Certain teachers have given me ideas both in class and there is one, Dr. Steyn, that has really inspired me by all of her community work outside the classroom. But, I have also seen that there is a lot of room for improvement in certain areas which I would like to mention(I’ll be talking alot about theology since that’s my area but, the principles are transferrable to many other majors).  This is not just at Helderberg, not just at Walla Walla or at Andrews but, something that I think is a problem with a majority of western style education.

Problems With Education

        I took a class last year called Philosophical Biology and while I learned some good things from it,  there’s one experience in it that I think highlights one of the biggest problems in education.  The first reading we were assigned to read was some guy’s doctoral dissertation on something about T-science, D-science and P-science.  That paper was quite a tough one to read let alone understand.  First of all I had to almost physically prop my eyes open with toothpicks in order to stay awake reading it.  And second, I had to read and reread quite a few of the sentences to make sure that I understood them properly because he was using such abstract and complicated languge.  I don’t think I ever fully understood what the good doctor was trying to talk about. This and my large amounts of reading of certain authors like Barth, Ricouer(hermeneutics), Kuhn(Scientific Revolutions-not quite so bad) and others that wrote in highly technical language frustrated me immensely because I felt like I was wasting my time and money for something that was never ever going to be useful. I started to seriously question the value and usefulness of this kind of education especially in theology.  

        When some of us as students explained our feelings to the professor, he said that doctors have to study highly technical details for 7 years and so why should theology be sloppy.  It should be just as rigorous since it is involved in saving spiritual lives. The problem is that this illustration breaks down very rapidly.  To be rigorous or thorough is not the issue.  You can be thorough either in technical or commonly understood language. Doctors and pastors do have some similarities.  They are both involved in saving people’s lives.  But there is a significant difference. Doctors use their knowledge to act on people’s bodies so that their lives may be saved. It is not necessary that the patients have one iota of medicinal knowledge. Pastors on the other hand are fundamentally opposite. They cannot just use their knowledge on someone. In fact, to do this is wrong.  They must communicate their knowledge in way that their patients-the common people are able to clearly understand and use it.  This is one of the reasons why it was so important to the reformers to have the Bible in the language of the people.  They realized that this weapon would be infinitely stronger than they themselves could ever be. Only when this happened could the gospel become effective and well known and enabled to shield people from error. To save people this knowledge must be transferable to common people and appear relevant.  It may be OK for doctors and scientists to stay in the technical realm and just use scientific lingo, but, for pastors to do this in my opinion is a crime. There may be a few theologians who are headed in a scientific or technical direction and maybe we need to add a specific major for this but, I don’t think that the aim of most theology courses should be to produce scientific theologians-but,  to produce pastors and shepherds of God’s people!  

        Most Theology majors are headed for the pastoral field where it is of the highest importance that they be relevant to a secular world(Grenville Kent(Australian involved in Christian comics and contemporary worship) and Jon Paulien (“Present Truth in a Secular World”) have illustrated this brilliantly) and able to communicate saving truths to common people in a way that is seen as attractive, important and meaningful BY THE COMMON PEOPLE!(they are not doctors operating on ignorant patients-they are teachers communicating knowledge). I agree that we need to have a solid and good philosophical base(which I think SDA education does fairly well) but, my problems with theology(and other areas of education) are:

Join now!

        1) Theologians have too often put the things of God out of reach of the people who need it most by the type of language they use. Most people are not willing to wade through lots of highly complicated language and do mental gymnastics to learn anything unless they are forced to in school(and as soon as they finish the class they forget most of what they studied. This emphasizes its uselessness).  And when pastors began to speak like this to their members, they become unintelligible and useless in helping members come closer to God.

        This kind of education ...

This is a preview of the whole essay