Nature Poetry - "Compare and Contrast the boyhood experiences of Seamus Heaney and William Wordsworth"

Authors Avatar

Nature Poetry

“Compare and Contrast the boyhood experiences of Seamus Heaney and William Wordsworth”

Seamus Heaney and William Wordsworth are two highly accredited poets who have been made famous by their excellent poetry. They both had many joyful and memorable experiences as well as very frightening ones. Both poets enjoyed an extremely close and personal relationship with nature. It was these experiences that created the inspiration needed to grasp the reader’s attention.

Seamus Heaney was born on April 13, 1939, the eldest of nine children. Heaney lived on the family farm about 30 miles northwest of Belfast and was a student at Queens College.

William Wordsworth was born on April, 7,1770 at Cockermouth on the River Derwent in the heart of the lake District. Wordsworth was a student at Cambridge.

The two poems, which I am going to compare, are “Death of a Naturalist” by Heaney and “Nutting” by Wordsworth.

Firstly I am going to look t “Death of a Naturalist” by Heaney. The title of this poem is the first thing to catch the reader’s attention. It makes the reader think what could have happened to make the young boy turn from loving nature to fearing it. There is an unpleasant atmosphere created early in this poem by the use of the words “festered,” “rotted,” and “sweltered.” These are not words we would commonly associate with nature. When you think of “nature” you think of flowers, trees etc. We do no think of the unpleasant side of nature. Heaney uses onomatopoeic phrases like, “bubbles gargled delicately.” “Gargled” and “delicately” are not two words we would associate together. Heaney describes how collecting frogspawn was his favourite time. He describes the frogspawn as “warm thick slobber.” He would keep them in jars until they “burst into nimble swimming tadpoles.” Heaney tells us of the cosy and attractive impression of nature that his teacher had created. Heaney talks about the “daddy frog” and the “mammy frog” and how when they croaked, hundreds of eggs were laid. This shows us how innocent and vulnerable to nature Heaney really was. He didn’t know the reality and seemed happy and content to be in his own “innocent” world. Heaney’s teacher was a woman who he looked up to as he says at the end of the first stanza. “You could tell the weather by the frogs, they were yellow in the sun and brown in the rain.” This was obviously a fact that Miss Walls had told him and Heaney probably included it in his poem to emphasise his innocence as a child.

Join now!

We then leave this innocent, unrealistic world, and enter into the second stanza of the poem. In this stanza, there is a comparison between Miss Wall’s description of nature and that, which is shown to us. To create unpleasant feeling, Heaney uses phrases like, “fields were rank with cow dung,” “frogs invaded the flax dam” and “coarse croaking.” These are unpleasant words but they are realistic. This was the side of nature Miss Walls had not told her class about. The reader then feels a sense of fear, as we are worried about the boy and hoping he will ...

This is a preview of the whole essay