• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Dangers of Science - "Brave New World" as a warning.

Extracts from this document...


Why? not Why Not? Science fiction literature has come a long way since the early roots of the 18th century stories about voyages to the moon and planets and visitors from the same, written by authors such as Voltaire. As science fiction has evolved, so has the science itself. Scientific developments, as ?predicted? by many science fiction authors, have come to pass in reality; and now, in this advanced state of technology that is the modern world, the question must be asked, why? This question of ?why? is both a physical and ethical debate. Also, if the world is on the brink of everything that science fiction has thus far presented, then what is the next step for humanity? The abovementioned questioned can be surmised into the following, just because we (the human race) can, does that mean we should (in relation to scientific experimentation and research)? There are advocates for both sides of this argument. There are those that believe that any and all opportunities should be taken regarding scientific development meanwhile, there are others that have to question taking such actions. The question of ?just because we can, does that mean we should? is comprised of two parts. First, the issue of morality in regards to scientific advancement. Scientific advancement, when it comes to morality has seen a lot of controversy. One such literary work that demonstrates this point is that of Aldous Huxley entitled ?Brave New World?. ...read more.


The moral battle between religious ideology and scientific methodology rages on; personal choice, advancement, the greater good, etc. all coming together in a explosion of ideas and reasons, with no end in sight. So, in the moral sense of being, just because we can, does that mean we should? Secondly, the physical nature of ?just because we can, does that mean we should? comes into play. In this advanced state of technology in which we live, cybernetics, artificial intelligence, and the like, transhumanism is not too far off. Transhuman is a state of being following post humanity and has been the source of inspiration for writers and film makers alike. Take, for example, the short story, ?2064, or Thereabouts?. The setting is a place full of the nonorganic, plastic and machine, the beings of the world containing as little mortal parts as possible due to the addition of mechanical components that function more efficiently. In today?s society, there is a group known as the World?s Transhumanist Society, seeking every opportunity to move towards this goal of mechanical bodies. The author of ?Better than Human?, John Coleman writes, ?They ?yearn to reach intellectual heights as far above any current human genius as humans are above other primates; to be resistant to disease and impervious to aging; to have unlimited youth and vigor; to exercise control over their own desires, moods, and mental states.? And no method of advancement?chemical, digital, molecular, or robotic?is outside the realm of reasonable discussion.? (Coleman 3) ...read more.


So, in the physical sense of being, just because we can, does that mean we should? The critics have provided a plethora of information regarding the moral and physical implications of a highly evolved, technologically advanced society. I feel that Coleman poses an excellent point when he states, ?The movement, in total, is a process where the process (improvement, immortality, ascension) is the purpose. There is rarely a ?why??; there is only ?why not?? (Coleman 9) I feel that the question of ?why?? must be asked more often than ?why not?? because often times the proponents for extreme scientific advancement attempt to power through life, not stopping to wonder the repercussions of their actions. From the evidence that I have gathered, I believe that just because we can, doesn?t mean we should. Morally, there are many issues and dangers with the experimentation and research that would ?better? society. For example, cloning is unnatural and drugs are used to correct bad behavior instead of discipline. Things are the way they are for a reason, whether it is of divine design or of natural causes. Physically, there are also many issues and dangers concerning advanced robotics and artificial intelligence. For example, when humans cease to be the highest rung on the evolutionary ladder, mankind is doomed to fall and be on a lesser plane of existence than our robotic overlords. Also, advanced weaponry will undoubtedly lead to more devastating wars that could in fact endanger the entire planet. Ask yourself, ?why?? not ?why not?? and the answers you discover will be much different. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Literary Criticism section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Literary Criticism essays

  1. The purpose of the writers incorporating the technique of using sexual desire as a ...

    He uses s*x to expose her as a woman, instead of the machine that the ward had viewed her as before, which we'll go into a bit later. When McMurphy tears her blouse off and reveals her, he shows the fact that she is a woman and therefore weaker, in their eyes, than the men.

  2. South Park isnt Sesame Street, it is not poison either

    They are afraid that viewers loose Christian values, even though many episodes of South Park end with an important and well-formulated moral. In the following, I will tell you why I think South Park is not that bad after all.

  1. Puddnhead Wilson as Fabulation

    Not so sweeping and imaginative as the great fabulations before it, nor so witty and wildly absurd as those of our own time, Pudd'nhead Wilson nevertheless shares characteristics of both groups and occupies a midpoint in their tradition. Like the great stories of the eighteenth century, Pudd'nhead Wilson is the

  2. Specters of Totalitarianism: Representations of Power and Control in Twentieth Century Dystopian Fiction ...

    of global communism.[13] This fear of totalitarianism was also again developed in the 1960s and 1970s. This period saw the rise of ?cyberpunk fiction? and also the ?feminist critical dystopia?, which although commented on contemporary issues such as environmentalism, feminism and globalisation, were pre-occupied with their dangers rather than their benefits.

  1. What and when was the Harlem Renaissance? The Harlem Renaissance was more than ...

    This is what has hindered the development of artists among us. Their one note has been the concern with their race. That is all very well, none of us can get away from it. I cannot at times. You will see it in my verse.

  2. A number of authors present scenarios that are very unlikely to occur in real ...

    On the other hand, The Silence of the Lambs presents very realistic scenarios in the characters themselves. For instance, Harris provides his readers with a very polite, very unassuming serial killer. While many people believe most, if not all, serial killers to be blatantly obvious killers (mean, scary looking, what

  1. From Hobbit to Hero- Frodo's Quest as an Examplary Monomyth

    (Tolkien, 2007: 80) He begs Gandalf to take the ring but the wizard refuses knowing that the desire to use it would be too great for him to resist and it would set free ?a power too great and terrible?? (Tolkien, 2007: 81).

  2. Perceptions of Death in Tuck Everlasting and Charlotte's Web

    White is trying to capture the idea of children being scared of death, and that they do not want to die, but, ultimately have no choice in the matter. They must learn to cope with the idea that one day it will come time to die.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work