The Landscape of London

Both The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and The Picture of Dorian Gray deal with the notion of duality – Dr. Jekyll is the respectable doctor whose alter-ego is the dark and animalistic Mr. Hyde, and Dorian Gray is a beautiful young man whose portrait becomes aged and decayed through his immorality and corruption. The notion of duality is also evident in both novels’ treatment of London as a city that is fragmented socially and geographically. In The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and The Picture of Dorian Gray, London is depicted in a manner that reflects the dual nature of the principal characters.

At first glance, it would appear as if Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde were two distinctly different individuals. They also reside in two separate, contrasting parts of London that appear to reinforce their character traits and the binary opposition between the two personas. The respectable Dr. Jekyll is a “well-made, smoothed face man of fifty” (44) who lives in a house that “wore a great air of wealth and comfort” (42) in a middle-class, West End neighborhood. In contrast, the atavistic Mr. Hyde is “wicked-looking” (47) and “downright detestable” (35), and he is appropriately situated in Soho, a dismal neighborhood that evokes the worst stereotypes about the East End. Yet, these binary oppositions are interrogated and deconstructed. The boundaries between good and evil are blurred when it is revealed that Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde are two facets of the same person. In a similar way, the distinctions between East and West London become blurred through the treatment of the setting.

Mr. Hyde emerges due to Dr. Jekyll’s inability to come to terms with his dual nature in an extremely rigid society that demands the repression of natural human appetites and instincts, and represents the darker side of human nature that Victorian society desperately wants to keep hidden and ignore. As a middle-class man, Dr. Jekyll’s livelihood depends on his ability to present a respectable public image that is at odds with his flawed inner nature. In a similar vein, the city of London struggles with its own identity. During one of his walks, Mr. Utterson encounters a busy quarter of London:

The street was small and what is called quiet, but drove a thriving trade on the week-days. The inhabitants were doing well, it seemed, and all emulously hoping to do better still, and laying out the surplus of their gains in coquetry, so their shop fronts stood along the thoroughfare with an air of invitation, like rows of smiling saleswomen. Even on Sunday, when it veiled its more florid charms and lay comparatively empty of passage, the street shone out in contrast to its dingy neighborhood, like a fire in a forest; and with its freshly painted shutters and well-polished brasses, and general cleanliness and gaiety of note, instantly caught and pleased the eye of the passenger. (32)

Join now!

Like the street’s inhabitants who lay “out the surplus of their gains in coquetry”, Dr. Jekyll desires to “wear a more than commonly grave countenance before the public” (78), and attempts to make himself look good before the public by appearing morally upright and performing good deeds. Also, the inhabitants’ hopes “to do better still” locates their desire for upward social mobility and material profit as sources of their motivation for putting on airs in order to gain social approval and to attract customers. The street “[shines] out in contrast to its dingy neighborhood”, yet the image is artificial ...

This is a preview of the whole essay