To what extent, and in what ways, would you describe any TWO or THREE of the following as feminist plays: Overtones, Trifles, A Man's World, Machinal?

Authors Avatar

                                                                                                 Christina Ableman – Modern American Drama

To what extent, and in what ways, would you describe any TWO or THREE of the following as feminist plays: Overtones, Trifles, A Man’s World, Machinal?

Throughout the early and mid 20th century, Feminism played an important factor in the readings of many literary works, mainly those written by leading women writers. The female cannon of Modern American Drama contributes to those feminist readings with leading authors such as Sophie Treadwell, Susan Glaspell and Alice Gerstenberg. Their literary work such as, ‘Trifles’, ‘Machinal’ and ‘Overtones’, are just three plays that express feminist ideologies; all of which feature female protagonists or female characters that “struggle for autonomy...in a male dominated society.” The form of Expressionism and the use of Language, stage directions and names are all approached in a feminist way to go to the extent of providing awareness to the troubles of women in their society.  

        Sophie Treadwell’s ‘Machinal’ contains a central reading of feminism. Critics of her literary work often claim that her “Partisanship of Feminism” marks the majority of her works.”² Within the play this “Partisanship” or devotion to feminism is clearly seen through the female protagonist Helen, otherwise known as ‘Young Woman’, “an ordinary young woman, any woman,”³ and the other women within ‘Machinal’. Even just through this choice of character name, ‘The young women’ Treadwell already displays feminism by providing a lack of identity for this character.

        All three of the female characters within the play possess a lack of identity through their character names. Treadwell seems to use this feminist technique of identity crisis as a starting point for her view on women in society, she shows how she felt women were perceived in her time and it would seem that Treadwell displays her female characters as nobodies in society. They are not seen as ‘Helen’ or as possessing their own personality, but just another ‘any woman’; not an “enlightened, socially aware New Found woman.”4 One could suggest this deliberate decision to allow an “any woman” to brave a male-dominated society significantly empowers Treadwell's message, putting fear into men and that all women can dramatically impact and destroy their husband's lives.

        In the introduction to ‘Machinal’ Judith E Barlow states that Treadwell herself was a feminist, “A member of the feminist Lucy Stone League, she marched in favour of women’s suffrage and wrote about society’s oppression of women.”5 She married but lived separately from her husband at times and pursued

her own career. In a way through the play and its characters, she is suggesting to the audience that this is what Helen and women like her should do, they can be successful without having to depend on a man.

        This ‘independence’ is revealed in episode eight when Helen’s name is first spoken in the court room after she kills her husband, “People of the state of ---versus Helen Jones,”6 perhaps symbolising her freedom – she has her own name again. However the Bailiff still only mumbles this sentence as though society is unsure about giving her freedom back, but later finally shouts her name, “HELEN JONES!” 6 It seems apparent that she has finally made her mark in society, that she is now at least ‘seen’ as more than just a ‘young woman’ - a murderer no less - but this is not what Treadwell wishes the audience to see. It seems she wishes the audience to know that without her husband she is free to be the person she chooses to be, “She achieves her true identity only through personal rebellion against society’s constraints on gendered behaviour.” 7 This man she married and depended upon stole her life and her identity, and Treadwell displays to the audience that women can be the person they want to be – they do not have to depend on a man to create their happiness.

        The use of names to present identity is also seen within Susan Glaspell’s ‘Trifles’, however one could say it varies from ‘Machinal’ but still reads as feminist. Susan Glaspell's play, ‘Trifles’, was written in 1916, long before the modern women's movement began, yet her story reveals, through Glaspell's use of formal literary conventions, the role that women are expected to play in society, and the harm that it brings not only the women, but the men as well.‘Trifles’ marked Susan Glaspell’s feminist work – it was her first major feminist play – and like Treadwell it deals with the same subject, a woman who is oppressed by society and her husband and eventually, to gain her own identity back, kills her husband. However one may argue that where Treadwell creates defenceless, oppressed women in a harsh, male dominated society, Glaspell actually presents the female characters as stronger and more intelligent than the men. She makes the same feminist critique – women are oppressed by men and society but she shows that these women won’t let themselves be put down by them, they fight back, and they solve a mystery. This could be supported through the use of character names. In ‘Machinal’ the woman’s names are hidden and they are known by their job title or simply as a woman, whereas in ‘Trifles’ it would seen that the women are the characters who have names ‘Mrs Peters,’ whereas the men are associated by their careers, ‘County Attorney’, perhaps signifying how in the play the women are actually superior to the men, which is proved when the women actually solve the crime, whereas the men do not. Glaspell could be suggesting how women could fend for themselves that they can rise above social oppression.

Join now!

        However one could disagree with this perception and it could be perceived that even though the women are given names, they are only given last names; Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters are not given first 

names. The role that society has cast them in is one that is defined by their husbands therefore suggesting a lack of identity. It suggests that they still have no identity other than that they are a ‘property’ of their husbands’. Glaspell suggests how women are owned by men, like ‘Machinal’ women are made to marry to better themselves.

        Another importance of names in ‘Trifles’ is the name ...

This is a preview of the whole essay