• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What were the roles, privileges and rights of women in both public and private live in Roman Egypt?

Extracts from this document...


ROMAN EGYPT What were the roles, privileges and rights of women in both public and private live in Roman Egypt? The classical world was, by large, a male-dominated one. Women of Greece and Rome could expect to live a life almost entirely sheltered from wider society and under the fierce guardianship of a male relative for all of her life. A woman's role within this world would rarely extend beyond that of wife and mother - political, social and academic spheres were an exclusively male domain of which women played little or no part. Though viewed as a mysterious and suspicious land by Graeco-Roman eyes, we might assume that a woman's place in ancient Egypt would have been no different. Greek Historian Herodotus, writing some 400 years before the Egyptian annex by Rome, provides a colourful description and perhaps one of the most famous passages on the social quirks of Egypt as he saw it: 'Just as the Egyptians have a climate peculiar to themselves, and their river is different in its nature from all other rivers, so, too, have they instituted customs and laws contrary for the most part to those of the rest of mankind. Among them, the women buy and sell, the men stay at home and weave; and whereas in weaving all others push the woof upwards, the Egyptians push it downwards. Men carry burdens on their heads, women on their shoulders. Women pass water standing, men sitting. They ease their bowels indoors, and eat out of doors in the streets, explaining that things unseemly but necessary should be done alone in private, things not unseemly should be done openly. No woman is dedicated to the service of any god or goddess; men are dedicated to all deities male or female. Sons are not compelled against their will to support their parents, but daughters must do so though they be unwilling.' ...read more.


celebrated, and those who could afford to do so might spend a great deal of money on making a wedding celebration as lavish as possible. In P.Oxy. XLVI 3313 (=Rowlandson 251), Apollonios and Sarapias write to Dionysia regarding her wedding, revealing the lengths they have gone to to have a decorative garland made of narcissus flowers and roses. If formal contracts were written regarding marriage, then we can assume it would be concerning the contents of a dowry. Although dowries had existed long before the Roman occupation of Egypt, their arrival saw a great increase of importance being placed upon them. It was not only money which passed to the groom, but also clothes and jewellery of which their monetary value would be carefully noted. Furthermore, these contracts revealed what would happen to the dowry should the couple divorce. Occasionally, a woman could receive the full dowry back; other times, as we see below, it remains in the possession of the husband: BGU IV 1103 (13 BC) To Protatchos from Zois daughter of Herakleides, with as guardian her brother Eirenaios son of Herakleides, and from Antipatros son of Zenon. Zois and Antipatros agree that they have separated from each other, severing the union which they had formed according to an agreement made through the same tribunal in Hathyr of the current 17th year of Caesar, and Zois acknowledges that she has received from Antipatros by hand from his house clothes to the value of one hundred and twenty drachmas and a pair of gold earrings, which he received as dowry. The marriage agreement shall henceforth be null, and neither Zois nor any other person acting for her shall take preceedings against Antipatros for the collection of the dowry [...] Divorce was by no means uncommon in Roman Egypt - marriages could be terminated quickly and with relative ease: very often, there is no reason given as to why a couple are divorcing, but occasionally it is due to one party's unfaithfulness or violence, or simply that a remarriage is sought. ...read more.


registration documents which reveals that here too, women made it their business to buy and sell property of various forms; slaves, camels, but in particular, houses. She specifies: 'Among the 32 documents recording sales of houses there are 35 women principles compared with 36 men. Among twelve documents recording registration of property, there are eight women property owners and 17 men.' (1983: 314) Using the evidence available which dates over a time span of 200 years, Hobson concludes that one-third of the village real estate was owned by women. She points out, however: 'Given that men's liabilities to liturgy to taxation and liturgy were greater than women's, we might suspect that men put their possessions into their wives' names in order to reduce the size of their own estates... For this reason it is critical to determine whether the role of women is merely a mask for the economic activities of the men in their households, or whether women really did function in their own capacities and in their own financial interests.' (1983: 316) And so, whilst it was general practice throughout the classical societies that it was sons, rather than daughters, who got the largest proportion of a family's inheritance, not all families were fortunate enough to have surviving male heirs and it was always preferable to keep such inheritance within the immediate family. As far as management of their own property is concerned, women were clearly offered considerable, yet conditional, freedom to control and dispose of it as they pleased. Hobson concludes, 'So when we reconsider our statistics from this one small village in light of the broader spectrum of evidence provided by wills from the whole country, we obtain confirmation for the hypothesis that the economic role of women in Roman Egypt was indeed genuine, as far as it went, but that it derived quite literally from the female right to share in the property of her own family by dowry and inheritance, and probably did not extend much beyond that. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Classical Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Classical Studies essays

  1. Free essay

    Could a female be as heroic as a male character in Greek tragedy?

    she remains faithful, hospitable to her unruly suitors, passive, and uses her innate cleverness to protect her marriage: she is the seemingly perfect wife - and so, the outcome for her must be a positive one. If her husband is the hero of the story, she is his suitable female counterpart.

  2. How does Ovid weave together the different myths in Book 6 of Metamorphoses into ...

    It is far more sinister and gives a much greater sense of unease at how the story will evolve. Both girls are persuade by their unwanted admirers and both plea with their fathers to help them. Whereas Daphne's pleas are answered with her father turning her into a laurel tree,

  1. What is the role of the nurse in different versions of the Hippolytus myth?

    Plate 1.2 (The Open University 2010 p.10) shows a pot that could have been produced specifically to represent the overall emotions portrayed within Euripides' version of the play. This particular pot would have been immediately recognisable as signifying the Hippolytus myth to many ordinary people.

  2. Shakespeare one word play in King Lear

    Lear has three daughters, of whom two are "unnatural" for not showing "a child-like office" (?, i, 105). The remaining filial one has two suitors, of whom one does not, while the other does, possess "natural" love for her. The two husbands of Lear's two elder daughters are again opposite to each other by nature: one good, the other evil.

  1. The Romans had a primarily utilitarian approach to myth Do you agree with this ...

    He created a precedent where future Emperors would thereafter be associated with Gods and myths. In direct contrast, Nero used myth in a way that the elite ruling classes found unacceptable and ultimately helped lead to his demise. As Nero left no heir to succeed him, there was no one

  2. What do the literary and historical texts tell us about Roman attitudes towards Egypt?

    The naval battle which took place in 31BC saw Octavian's forces in Rome in a battle against the combined forces of Antony and Cleopatra. The battle of Actium would be the final war of the Republic, and Octavian's subsequent victory would see him become undisputed head of the Roman world

  1. JUVENIL'S SATIRES - attacking the Patron-Client Relationship in Roman Politics.

    that all clients could expect from his patron. From its respected position as part of the social foundation of Rome, this relationship evidently became a burden to all parties as the time wore on. This is a far cry from the peaceful days, when patrons gained prestige through their clientele, not amusement.

  2. In Book 9 of Homers The Iliad, Aias seemingly plays a very minor role ...

    Achilleus is not at all offended by Aias?s accusations because they are true. Perhaps he has accepted that he puts too much emphasis on honor, a seemingly definitive flaw to his character. However, once again due to his close relationship with the gods, Achilleus is aware at this point that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work