Comparison Between Gladiator And Apollo 13.

Authors Avatar

Comparison Between Gladiator 

And Apollo 13

The era these two films are set in are completely different, more than two thousand years apart. Apollo 13 is set in the 1970s whereas Gladiator is set in the brutal Roman times BC. The genres of these two films are different Apollo 13 is a true story of the unsuccessful space mission to the moon. Gladiator is an action adventure story with the roman genre of sword and sandals through out the film, which hasn’t been on at the cinema for along time. The film includes gruesome battles.

        Ridley Scott directs Gladiator. Forced into slavery by the corrupt, incestuous heir to the throne, Roman general Maximus becomes a gladiator. His prowess in the arena will eventually lead him to Rome, the coliseum and a vengeful show down with the new emperor.

        Ron Howard directs Apollo 13. It had been less than a year since man first walked on the Moon, but as far as the American public was concerned, Apollo 13 was just another “routine” space flight, until these words pieced the immense void of space: “Houston we have a problem.”

Join now!

        Stranded 205,000 miles from earth in a crippled space ship, astronauts Jim Lovell, Fred Haise and Jack Swigert fight a desperate battle to survive. Mean while, at Mission Control, astronaut Ken Mattingly, and a heroic ground crew race against time and the odds, to bring them home.

        Either produce the state of the art graphics and special effects but Gladiator comes out best with the detail of scenic views containing Rome with the extravagant Coliseum and other roman buildings.

        Gladiator also comes out best with the music composed by Hans Zimmer who brings the right music at the right time ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

Avatar

There are some exceptionally insightful observations about the deep similarities between these two ostensibly different films that come close to revealing just how superficial the "huge" differences in setting, plot, etc. actually are in terms of what the films ultimately mean, and who they appeal to. For this reason, the conclusion is very disappointing. Although a personal appraisal of the relative merit of the two films is sometimes acceptable, especially if the point of the essay is to say which film is preferred and why this is the case, it's usually preferable to conclude a comparative essay by summing up the "essence" of the differences and similarities, and to make some statement about what the differences signify. This essay lays the groundwork for an excellent example of this, and then undoes all of that good work by returning to a rather shallow personal appraisal. 3 stars