How does the film "witness" show the clash between Amish and modern American culture?

Authors Avatar

How does the film “witness” show the clash between Amish and modern American culture?

The film “witness” directed by Peter Weir, was first released in 1985. Its genre is one of violence and action, tempered by love and an on going struggle against the constraints of two very different worlds. The plot includes Samuel, a small Amish boy, a witness to the brutal murder of a policeman by a corrupt of officer. After the investigation, police officer John Book flees with the Amish and evades the assassination attempts orchestrated by the ring of drug pushing law enforcers. He finds sanctuary within the Amish community. Whilst there, John falls in love with Rachel, who is Samuels mother. Finally the corrupt policemen discover John’s hideout and, after a final showdown, are captured and brought to justice. At the last however, John is forced to leave Rachel and they both return to their respective worlds.

        The Amish community is a devout Christian religious sect located in various states across the US. Due to their religious convictions, they do not believe in many modern conveniences. As such, they spurn most modern technology in favour of plain homespun clothes and archaic farming techniques. This way of life however, is in direct contrast and, in some cases, conflict with modern America. This is one of the most important film devices used by peter Weir in “Witness” as it adds much needed depth to what is essentially a basic cops and robbers story. With out the highlighted difference between the two cultures, most of Peter Weirs plot would be fundamental flawed and, in more ways than one, irrelevant. The contrast also adds a certain entertainment value as it is amusing to watch a long traffic jam behind a horse and cart.  Peter Weirs use of objects in the environment is one of the ways that he creates a clear definition between the Amish and Modern worlds. He uses a very subtle and sophisticated technique, which allows objects from both worlds to appear in the same scene, yet look so totally separate and out of place.  He creates an impression within the modern world of uncaring and unmitigated violence. The uniformity of the modern world and the aesthetical ugliness of the objects lend themselves to create tension and danger, as if nobody in the city cares or emphasizes with anybody else’s problems. This is poignantly shown by Peter Weir’s uses of guns and bullets. These are objects, whose sole purpose is to bring pain and death, and you can see by the blasé handling of them by John Book that he is desensitised to the violence that they represent; he considers a weapon an everyday object.  The other distinct impression that you encounter is one of haphazardness and artificiality, as if none in the city take pride in their work and therefore made them as quickly as possible without much care or effort. This is Cleary represented by the lack of quality displayed by the cutlery in Book’s sisters’ house, or the cheap, noisy and unattractive chattiness of other items such as the telephones or vendors in the urban setting.  

Join now!

        The Amish world, however, is the direct opposite to this, a point that, I think, Peter Weir wanted highlighted. The amount of care and attention that is exhibited by nearly every item in view in all of the Amish scenes is in direct contrast with that of the modern world. Each item in the Amish household shows the care and attention to detail that can only be achieved by time-consuming labour done by hand. From the lemonade they drink to the buildings they build, this is displayed in every aspect of their life.  The misc on scene always has a ...

This is a preview of the whole essay