Ahsan Ahmed 037723
Metropolis Analysis
Metropolis is arguably the first and most important science fiction film ever produced and is sets the standard as the archetype film of this genre or of films with similar generic conventions. The most significant quality of this film is that the special effects used in this sci-fi epic were groundbreaking at the time of the release and still have the power to amaze audiences. The silent film is based upon the futuristic city of metropolis set in 2026 or there about and it is based around various themes such as the struggle between the rulers and the working class, the ignorance of the individuals at the summit of the “Metropolis”, human oppression and enslaved working conditions which the workers had to put up with.
The themes are important as it gives us an idea of what the social and political issues were during the making of the film and as we already know Germany and most of the world was going through a stage of fascism and communism. The main fear of the ruling governments were rebellion and uprisings against many factions and from this came the fear of what was in store in the future as is are revealed in Metropolis. As I have already indicated Metropolis was the first science fiction film so in turn it set the benchmarks for the generic conventions and iconography, which we see amongst us in present day cinematography. The portrayal of these generic standards is shown through magnificent and smallest of detail in the misc en scene such as the close up of Rotwang the mad scientist to the effects used to demonstrate the transformation of Maria to the Robot.
This is a preview of the whole essay
Teacher Reviews
Here's what a teacher thought of this essay
A weak conclusion to an essay that contains some quite insightful observations. Very early, the author establishes the basis for an excellent argument about the "deeper meaning" of the spectacular and phantasmatic iconography of Science Fiction movies, but despite some very good observations that would help to make such an argument, the essay never really develops beyond the notion that Metropolis set the standard for everything that was to follow. 3 stars