In opposition to the the Psychoanalysis approach and the behaviorism that were dominating the psychology field (Votaw, 2020), a “third force” came in action, a movement named the humanistic approach began in the early 1960s (Lawson et al., 2018), moving against the psychoanalysis and behaviorism believe that a lot of human behavior is determined by past experiences or the environment surrounding them, the humanisms focus is on the conscious experience, on the human self, the innate good of all human beings, and the existence of free will (Votaw, 2020), the humanism had contributed in many practices today, such as the client centered therapy, the client centered therapy is a holistic approach designed to improve the quality of the provided therapy services, focusing not only on the client but also the people and the environment surrounding the client (Kim & Park, 2017), this type of therapy had maximized the results wanted from patient in two major ways, firstly, having the client being involved in their own care, in contrast to them submitting to the health provider, and having the client’s family and care givers participating in caring for the client, which results in maximum satisfaction from the client, and better social and coping skills, which in turn reduces the chance of recharges (Sanerma et al., 2020), this type of method had resulted in other types of care emerging in the health field such as the family centered communication programs around the globe, such programs focuses on the impact the family members has on the patient health, and therefor improving the communication between the health care team and the patient’s family (Khan et al., 2018), Another fundamental part of the humanistic approach is the, it is a system suggested by Abraham Maslow, showing the correlation between the human needs and motivations (Dohlman et al., 2019), this theory of motivation is usually visualized as a pyramid, where the most basic needs are at the bottom of this pyramid and the higher human needs (the less basic) are at the top of the pyramid, and normal human being will try to satisfy the needs at the bottom of the pyramid first, and if those needs are not met, the human will show an increased motivation to get them (Shoib et al., 2022).
Maslow Hierarchy of Needs (from the most basic to the least basic)
- Physiological needs: water, food, shelter.
- Safety needs: physical, psychological, and financial safety.
- Social belonging: family, friends, and social groups.
- Esteem: respecting the self and respecting others.
Self actualization: [Grab your reader’s attention with a great quote from the document or use this space to emphasize a key point. To place this text box anywhere on the page, just drag it.]
- making use of the individual capacities. (Dohlman et al., 2019)
Lastly there is the humanism impact on the positive psychology movement, a movement started by Martin Seligman in 2000, focusing its studies on the topic of happiness, and well-being (Seligman, 2019).
Conclusion: direct comparison and contraction between the three approaches, firstly, all of the three schools of thoughts believe in the power the nurturing environment has on shaping the human behavior (Biswas-Diener & Diener, 2019), Both the psychoanalytic approach and the humanistic approach have a focus on the self, the individual beliefs, and the concept of self esteem (Widiastiti et al., 2019) (University of Minnesota, 2015), Both the psychoanalytic approach and the humanistic are highly subjective, while in comparison the Behavioristic approach is very objective (Wertheimer & Puente, 2020), the psychoanalytic approach focuses mostly on the individual aspects but also considers the majority laws, while the behaviorism is the opposite, focusing mostly on the majority laws yet also on some individual aspects, the humanistic approach however is in a balance between majority laws and the individual aspects, in contrast to the psychoanalysis and the behaviorism the humanistic approach embraces the concept of free will, and the human having control over their behaviors, although subjective, the psychoanalytic approach can be experimented with, as well as the behaviorism being very objective and observable, yet in comparison the concepts of humanism can rarely be experimented with (mostly for ethical reasons), leaving some questions about the credibility of some of its concepts, another area of similarity between the psychoanalytic approach and the humanistic approach is the introduction of the safety as a core need of a mentally healthy human being, and the danger that both the absence or the excess of safety have on the development of the self, although doing the behaviorism justice, the impact of fear is strongly presented and studied in the behaviorism theory, another major similarity between the three is the recognition of the past experiences influence on the mind, the psychoanalysis being very focused on this point making the whole theory about it, while the behaviorism represented it in the theory of the constructive mind recognizing that people use past experiences to identify with new ones, the humanistic however had put less focus on this area yet still recognized it as a basic human behavior (Kearns & Lee, 2015), all in all while each approach viewed the essence of human in a perspective unique to their own, one must remember that the topic of human nature is a very subjective one, so it is unlikely that a debate such as this one will have an and.
References
Abramson, C. (2013). Problems of Teaching the Behaviorist Perspective in the Cognitive Revolution. Behavioral Sciences, 3(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs3010055
Bateman, A. W., Holmes, J., & Allison, E. (2020). Introduction to psychoanalysis : Contemporary theory and practice (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2019). Discover psychology 2.0 : A brief introductory text. DEF Publishers.
Cherniak, A. D., Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., & Granqvist, P. (2020). Attachment Theory and Religion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 40(Religion). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.08.020
Coleman, M. J., & Ganong, L. H. (2014). The social history of the American family an encyclopedia. Los Angeles, Calif. Sage.
Dohlman, L., DiMeglio, M., Hajj, J., & Laudanski, K. (2019). Global Brain Drain: How Can the Maslow Theory of Motivation Improve Our Understanding of Physician Migration? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(7), 1182. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071182
Kay, D., & Kibble, J. (2016). Learning theories 101: Application to everyday teaching and scholarship. Advances in Physiology Education, 40(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00132.2015
Kearns, T., & Lee, D. (2015). General Psychology: An introduction. GALILEO.
Khan, A., Spector, N. D., Baird, J. D., Ashland, M., Starmer, A. J., Rosenbluth, G., Garcia, B. M., Litterer, K. P., Rogers, J. E., Dalal, A. K., Lipsitz, S., Yoon, C. S., Zigmont, K. R., Guiot, A., O’Toole, J. K., Patel, A., Bismilla, Z., Coffey, M., Langrish, K., & Blankenburg, R. L. (2018). Patient safety after implementation of a coproduced family centered communication programme: multicenter before and after intervention study. BMJ, k4764. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4764
Kim, S. K., & Park, M. (2017). Effectiveness of person-centered care on people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Interventions in Aging, Volume 12(12), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.s117637
Krapfl, J. E. (2016). Behaviorism and Society. The Behavior Analyst, 39(1), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-016-0063-8
Lantz, S. E., Ray, S., & Nassau Univ Med Ct. (2022). Freud Developmental Theory. StatPearls Publishing.
Lawson, R. B., E Doris Anderson, & Cepeda-Benito, A. (2018). A history of psychology : globalization, ideas, and applications (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Löffler-Stastka, H., & Steinmair, D. (2021). Future of processing and facilitating change and learning. World Journal of Psychiatry, 11(9), 507–516. https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v11.i9.507
Moore, J. (2013). Methodological behaviorism from the standpoint of a radical behaviorist. The Behavior Analyst, 36(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392306
Pinter-Wollman, N., Jelić, A., & Wells, N. M. (2018). The impact of the built environment on health behaviours and disease transmission in social systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1753), 20170245. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0245
Sanerma, P., Miettinen, S., Paavilainen, E., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2020). A client-centered approach in home care for older persons – an integrative review. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 38(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2020.1841517
Seligman, M. E. P. (2019). Positive Psychology: A personal history. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095653
Shoib, S., Amanda, T. W., Menon, V., Ransing, R., Kar, S. K., Ojeahere, M. I., Halabi, S. E., & Saleem, S. Mohd. (2022). Is Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Applicable During the COVID-19 Pandemic? Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 44(1), 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176211060435
Spielman, R. M., Jenkins, W. J., & Lovett, M. (2020). Psychology 2e. Openstax College, Rice University.
Stangor, C., Walinga, J., Bc Open Textbook Project, & Bccampus. (2019). Introduction to psychology. Bccampus, Bc Open Textbook Project.
University of Minnesota. (2015). Introduction to psychology. University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing.
Vesa Talvitie. (2019). FOUNDATIONS OF PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORIES : project for a scientific enough psychoanalysis. Routledge.
Votaw, K. B. (2020). General psychology for honors students. University of Missouri - St. Louis.
Watson, J. B. (2017). Behaviorism. Routledge.
Wertheimer, M., & Puente, A. E. (2020). A brief history of psychology (6th ed.). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.