• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically assess the strengths and weaknesses of the multi agency public protection arrangements. (MAPPA)

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Dangerous Offenders and Public Protection Student No. 481365 Critically assess the strengths and weaknesses of the multi agency public protection arrangements. (MAPPA) The issue of how to protect the public from dangerous offenders has been highly debated since the early 1970s (Kemshall & Maguire, 2001, p. 239) when a highly publicised case involving a mentally ill patient called for stronger preventative methods when dealing with offenders. The case involved Graham Young who poisoned members of his family, he was committed to a special hospital and later released without any effective monitoring or supervision, he went on to commit further murders using the same method (Kemshall & Maguire, 2001, p. 239). A variety of sentencing reforms were proposed after this case, including indeterminate prison sentences (Butler Committee 1975 cited by Kemshall & Maguire, 2001, p. 239) to incapacitate offenders who are judged to pose a risk of serious harm to the public, these proposals however were strongly and effectively resisted by opponents. During the 1980s, concerns continued to grow about dangerous offenders being released from prison and how they were managed in the community. Since then public protection has been high on the Government's agenda, it is now a formally stated aim of the national probation service and Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements have been put in place (Kemshall, 1998, p. 22). This essay will outline the development of those Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) ...read more.


Not only will this lack of resources mean more of a reliance on actuarial tools rather than professional judgement but may have the effect of compromising rather than enhancing public protection (Nash & Williams, 2008, p. 3). A further strength of MAPPA is that the multiple needs of the offender can be met by a multi agency approach. It is acknowledged (Yakeley & Taylor, 2011, p. 174) that the identification and management of risk is a complex and difficult task, risk has dynamic variables that can be influenced by a variety of factors and circumstances that need regular monitoring. Offenders have multiple needs (McSweeney & Hough, 2006, p. 114), involving a variety of differing factors and circumstances, and as such, agencies such as probation rely on outside agencies to assist with those needs. Kemshall & Wood (2007, p. 215) argue that the most effective method to manage offenders is if all the relevant agencies work together and MAPPA provides a framework within which different agencies collaborate in identifying and managing the risks posed by relevant offenders. This ensures the offender is receiving the necessary supervision in order to maintain a non-criminal future. One of the central aspects of effective Multi Agency working and MAPPA (Nash, 2006, p. 153) is coordination between the agencies. A key weakness with MAPPA is that the different agencies involved vary in their core aims and core practices; McAlinden (2007, p. ...read more.


However the problem here (Nash & Williams, 2008, p. 117) is that although professional judgement and risk assessment tools may provide an indication about the offenders likelihood of reoffending no one actually knows for sure, except for maybe the offender. The effectiveness and success of MAPPA is therefore based on the assumption that the offender would reoffend (Nash & Williams, 2008, p. 119). Indeed, Wood et al (2007, p. 8) in their research found that the definition of effectiveness within MAPPA was underdeveloped, partly because it is difficult to clarify and measure. They also recommended that MAPPA needed to develop ways of measuring effectiveness. All criminal justice agencies have their strengths and weaknesses, the integration of them all into MAPPA aimed to create a solution to the weaknesses and to develop greater strengths (Kemshall, 2010, p. 212); MAPPA has been a major development in working towards the competent management of violent and sexual offenders and protecting the public. MAPPA provides a framework within which many different agencies can come together, share information and intelligence, and put effective interventions in place that meet the offenders needs as well as the need to protect the public. However, difficulties remain and whilst some can be overcome with enhanced training and clearer boundaries, others require increased resources to meet increasing demands. It has been acknowledged that MAPPA processes and systems have improved since its inception (Nash & Williams, 2008, Kemshall, 2010) and perhaps MAPPAs greatest strength will be that it continues to learn from their experiences and evolve. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Criminology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Criminology essays

  1. Reflective Essay on working with a Team

    Whilst this forming stage is rarely smooth for any team7, I would still have preferred a smoother start.

  2. Compare positivist approaches to crime with at least two other perspectives discussed in the ...

    It is not an absolute prediction that everyone with these characteristics will commit crime (Alexiadis, 2004:49). A final problematic issue is the methodology in the studies of biological positivism. The methodology used might be labelled as simplistic and consequently the conclusions about 'real' or 'significant' differences between criminals and non-criminals can in fact be highly speculative (Department of Criminology, 2006/07:3-9).

  1. How can research and evidence based practice inform effective interventions with substance misusing offenders?

    But, by referring suitable probation service users to treatment probation officers may provide the most effective interventions currently available for offenders whilst also contributing to meeting the performance indicators for the Updated Strategy. Due to the relative success of DTTO's compared with other programmes based solely on cognitive behaviouralism there

  2. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of youth justice policies in England and Wales since ...

    This is also strength as all involved have a good knowledge of the problems and the system and would be a good resource to the system to have. And also what the Task Force has recommended is also a good step forward as it is these that have stopped the system from being efficient.

  1. Sexual Offences and Offending Behaviour. Critically compare and contrast the public notification/disclosure programmes currently ...

    The police can then perform a full risk assessment of the situation allowing them to work with the parent, career, or guardian to protect the child. (DeVries, 2011, p. 4). Sex offender public notification/disclosure is one of the core regulatory measures for managing sex offenders in the community enacted over the past few decades (McAlinden, 2010, p.

  2. Critically examine the suggestion that punishment today is as much about risk management as ...

    There seems little doubt that punishment today is as much about risk management as it is about reducing re-offending and perhaps this is merely an evolution in policy that reflects an evolution in society. As Durkheim (1964 cited by Cheliotis, 2006, p.

  1. Critically assess the methods used to measure violence and victimisation

    Police officers have the power to make judgement and can influence the number of crimes that are recorded, for example cases where victims are minors or mentally ill people may be ignored when officer have other more serious cases to deal with.

  2. Describe the legislation that promotes the protection of children.

    girl who was abused by her aunt and aunts boyfriend which led to her death ,which led to a public inquiry headed by Lord Lemming and resulted in the green paper Every child matters and the introduction of Children?s Act 2004 .[citation] IN England and Wales the Children?s Act 2004

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work