• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do the people truly rule in a representative democracy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Democracy means 'rule by the people.' Do the people truly rule in a representative democracy? Abstract This essay argues that the people cannot be seen to truly rule in a representative democracy in both a theoretical and practical sense. Starting with theoretical issues this essay discusses the concept of political representation as one that fails to extensively make present the views of those who are represented. The essay then goes on to analyse modern practical issues with representative democracy that arise from the diminshing power of the representative in comparison to non elected individuals in the political sphere. The essay goes on to conclude therefore that the people cannot be seen to truly rule in a representative democracy Student number - 110118471 The issue of analysing the extent to which persons can be seen to rule is one that is difficult due to the fact that it is not something which is concretely observable . Key to attempting to answer this question however are three different issues which shall be examined in this essay. Firstly is the issue of whether the concept of representation itself can legitimately be understood as the rule of those who are represented. I plan to analyse this through discussion on how people vote, because this gives an insight into how people intend to be represented. ...read more.

Middle

The reason for this is that a representative can be elected on the strength of individual policies such as being nationalist. In a representative democracy this then also gives them the mandate to pursue other policies as they please regardless of whether this reflects those they represent. For example a candidate may get elected for his nationalist approach, but then may use this power to pursue socialist economic goals. Therefore the people who vote in a rational sense for their own individual and specific benefits cannot be seen to rule in this approach either. This issue of the freedom of the elected representative to act as they choose is one that has much scholarly debate. It is a point raised by Rousseau (1968, p.141) who argues that the people are "free only during election of members of parliament; as soon as the members are elected, the people is enslaved".Whilst the counter argument could be raised to this that government's are always concerned with what people think because they want to stay in power the next time there are elections, in reality it is commonplace for politicians to alter policies after being elected. Therefore to say that the people rule in such a system is incorrect. The people only rule in choosing who they want to rule them, as Schumpeter (1976, p.270) ...read more.

Conclusion

The effect the party system has on agenda setting is that it makes it easier because the power is generally in the hands of a few major groups who can dictate the nature of elections. Whilst it could be argued that a party system is unavoidable, in reality, there are always going to be individuals who agree in certain areas and disagree in certain areas and will use their similarities to their political advantage. Even in what is seen as the beacon of democracy of ancient Athens, Bonner (1961, pp. 45, 61) argues there were crude party organizations which allowed statesmen to ensure their majority. In the same way that parties set the agenda for the voter in who they vote for, they also set the agenda for the representative by forcing them to stick to party policy which is often influenced by individuals who are not elected. Therefore the strength that parties have in representative democracy is another factor that emphasises the argument that the people cannot be seen to rule. As has been shown in this essay, representative democracy is an approach to government which in very few senses equates to rule by the people. The numerous theoretical issues with representative democracy are accentuated by the modern problems surrounding the declining power of the representative. Whilst typically democracy is seen as a form of government by the people, in the case of representative democracy this is clearly not the case. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Political Theories section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Political Theories essays

  1. Why Should We Value Democracy?

    The captain is larger and stronger than any of the crew, but a bit deaf and short sighted, and similarly limited in seamanship. The crew are all quarrelling with each other about how to navigate the ship, each thinking he ought to be at the helm; they have never learned

  2. Turkish Foreign Policy Last 10 Years

    Later, Turkey's agreement with Germany on 9 October 1941, which envisaged a sale of 90.000 tons of chromium, made her allies angry. As Germany's attack to Soviet Union on 22 June 1941 confronted Turkey, it emerged a new concern to Turkish diplomacy in addition.

  1. Evaluation of the impact of the counter terrorism policies

    necessary to do this questions, because in the first place the result might be achieved very easily, because sometimes it is quiet easy to understand that person is strange and know something and hiding it only through the conversation. It follows that this point is very effective and might be done on a professional level.

  2. Women can only be properly represented politically by other women. Discuss

    As Spelman (1998) states, it is not possible to detach ?the woman part? of an individuals characteristics from the rest of their identity. In such a sense then it must be concluded that we cannot assume that women will be able to successfully represent women in terms of shared experiences,

  1. In what ways do 'Jeffersonian' and 'Hamiltonian' concepts of American government and democracy differ ...

    Jefferson on the other hand opposed such reform. He was tentative to create a ?Bank of the United States? which had too much English influence. He also argued that such an institution was unconstitutional; the constitution did not give congress the right to establish an independent bank.

  2. A critical analysis of Wollstonecraft's reaction to Rousseau

    own ?women would not then marry for support?[19], as they would be able to support themselves. As such, marriages would be formed for the right reasons and would thus be more likely to be successful, truly sacred marriages. As an egalitarian liberal, Wollstonecraft believes that women should be given access

  1. Power. A gets B to do something that he or she would not ...

    This fiction of common interests between the collectivized peasantry and the State is likely to persist. The only alternative is freedom with its hundred schools of thought contending. As Mao knows from his brief experiment of last spring, this would give rise to a flood of criticism which, if unchecked, could weaken the regime and doom the collectives.

  2. Was Thatcherism anything more than traditional Conservatism adapted to the conditions of the 1980s?

    Furthermore, it generated a significant amount of instantaneous cash flow required to cover the cost of lower taxation. However, as council houses in ?desirable areas? were being sold at below their market rate and often to property developers seeking to make a profit, new developments of council houses were concentrated in ?undesirable areas?, with little employment opportunity for their tenants.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work