• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine International Intervention in the Case of the Sierra Leonean Civil War

Extracts from this document...


Examine International Intervention in the Case of the Sierra Leonean Civil War According to the UN, 2005 saw the end of a highly successful peacekeeping mission in Sierra Leone (UN, Year in Review: 2005, 2006). The United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone (UNAMSIL), the UN boldly asserts "oversaw a feeble process... demonstrating how the world body can respond to the needs and demands of countries emerging from conflict in a rapidly changing global environment" (UN, Year in Review: 2005, 2006). Similarly, the mission was seen as a good war for British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who championed intervention, as was British involvement in Former Yugoslavia. UNAMSIL lasted for 6 years, long after the initial conflict was resolved. The Sierra Leonean Civil War actually began in 1991, as rebels (supported by Liberia's Charles Taylor) began seizing Diamond mines, collecting supporters along the way (Gberie, 2005). The goals of the RUF were sometimes blurred, and with no triadic nexus, ethnic conflict or obvious oppression to speak of, the Sierra Leonean civil war would prove a difficult one to understand, let alone tackle. International intervention is by no means a modern phenomenon, however, since the end of the Cold War the meaning, understanding and implementation of International intervention has changed rapidly (Fassin & Pandolfi, 2010), with ever growing emphasis on the "Responsibility to Protect" (Evans & Sahnoun, 2002). International intervention is broadly separated in two categories: coercive intervention and co-operative intervention, however many scholars recognise the possibility, or rather evolution of a third, hybrid category. ...read more.


With no personal gains to be made, and no offensive mandate, they are often a welcome sight in a conflict, at least by civilians. In the time after the ECOMOG troops had left, the rebels had done well in seizing the opportunity. Within a few months, 18,000 UN peacekeepers had been deployed, the majority from the ECOWAS nations (Adebajo, 2008). However, the UN still failed to adequately equip the peacekeepers, just as it had ECOMOG. Furthermore the mission details were complex and misunderstood by many. Once again, also, a power struggle arose as some senior peacekeepers accused the Nigerian members of the mission of colluding to prolong the war, so that they may benefit from the illicit diamond trade, and whilst no proof was found, the damage to the missions reputation was done. It is imperative that a peacekeeping mission is seen, at all times, to be above and beyond the deplored violence of a war's combatants. (Goulding, 451-64) It is also imperative that the peacekeepers are seen to have a stronger military force than the combatants, otherwise their deterrent potential is diminished. However, in this case, the presence of the UN Peacekeeping force did more harm than good. The RUF asserted that the peace accord made no mention of the UN sending the force, and as such would not adhere to their involvement. The peacekeepers would soon find out that the "biggest problem in implementing peace accords in civil wars is getting parties to live up to their commitments" (Stedman, 1996). ...read more.


If it is so, that the outcome of intervention justifies the means, then surely the sum of International Intervention in the Sierra Leonean Civil War is justified. Effective, also, as although still one of the poorest nations on Earth, Sierra Leone has undoubtedly found the route to democracy, and has shown no real sign of slipping back into conflict. This is not to say, however, that the International Intervention was without criticism. Sierra Leone was an unprecedented case in when the conflict began, lacking in clear lines of division. Perhaps mindful of a public relations disaster, or perhaps sensitive to the history of the Sierra Leonean people (particularly the Krio), The United Nations was happy to delegate Intervention to ECOWAS. ECOWAS was formed for economic purposes, with little experience in military intervention and this was problematic from the very beginning. It would have better for all involved if the UN had taken the reins after the Abidjan Peace Accord. It should no longer be acceptable for the UN to delegate peacekeeping missions to the nearest regional organisation. Interventionists failed, for far too long, to see the link between the diamonds of Sierra Leone, the international community, and the conflict. Had the embargo been placed sooner, the Civil War could have ended years before it did. As stated earlier, the Sierra Leonean Civil War saw many means of intervention used, some more effective than others. What cannot be tolerated, however, is the half-hearted approach the United Nations took to intervening early on. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree International Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree International Politics essays

  1. The International Economy, International Regimes and the Relations of Global Disparities

    There are three foreign aid models that identify how aid exchanges are commonly made in the international community.

  2. Manning's Quasi-Masterpiece: The Nature of International Society Revisited

    and the debate between Dunne and his critics in Cooperation and Conflict: Nordic Journal of International Studies, Vol 35, No 2, June 2000. 6 Though not contempt. India did offer a legal justification. The continued occupation of Goa by the Portuguese amounted to 'permanent aggression'.

  1. 2nd Draft Dissertation - The invasion of Afghanistan, The Iraq conflict, and The dubious ...

    a safe haven for international terrorists and immediately hand over Osama Bin Laden. Failure to comply had clear consequences for the Taliban which were outlined in Paragraph 4, but the use of force was not included. This indicates that there was no consensus on using force to suppress the terror network of Bin Laden.

  2. What is more important in international mediation power or impartiality?

    They agree that, as third parties, it is their role to prevent or stop destructive behaviour and facilitate a settlement, but not through means of force (1982: 5, 2002: 5, 1991: 100). However, the idea of the mediator supplementing the parties' own efforts in the face of failure (Pruitt, 2002:

  1. What was the Cold War and why did it end?

    Whilst America believed in capitalism and democracy, the USSR thought Communism was the best ideology. The Cold War was then separated into 3 groups: The United States leading the West (countries with democratic political systems), the Soviet Union led the East (countries with communist political systems and lastly but not

  2. Globalisation: fair trade

    The telegraph again discusses the brands growing success declaring it as one of the fastest growing retail sectors in Britain, whilst the Financial Times informs on the latest retailer to jump on the fairtrade bandwagon: Cadbury; surely only a positive contribution to the brand?

  1. To what extent does a feminist perspective require the re-structuring of the study of ...

    These characteristics are not in favour of feminists, and requires a desirable foreign policy which is the one which do the best for "power and autonomy" and protects it citizen from outside threats. Consequently, the gender distinctions organize social activities between groups of human (Harding, cited in Tickner, 2010:196).

  2. The Effect of Nationalist Ideology on Violence in Yugoslavia in the 1990s

    which is usually thought to ?indicate increasing assimilation (and) increasing integration (amongst) social groups? (Hayden 1996: 788). Indeed, these ?mixed? marriages were particularly common between Serbs and Muslims in Bosnia-Hercegovina, and, perhaps most notably, between Serbs and Croats in Croatia.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work