• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful is the idea of "the postwar consensus" in analysing British politics after 1945

Extracts from this document...


How useful is the idea of "the postwar consensus" in analysing British politics after 1945? Most political, economic and social commentators in the post-1945 period are generally in favour of the view that after World War Two a "postwar consensus" existed. Alleged to have been in existence from the mid 1940's to the mid 1970's, it consisted of all the politicians of all major political parties agreeing to a range of policies which Britain were seen to require in an age shattered by the war. The term "consensus" means agreement when translated from Latin and is said to exist in politics when politicians are happily agreeing over a range of issues concerning the well being of society. Those who believe that the consensus existed believe that its birth was in May 1940, when Winston Churchill took charge. Despite the fact that few people believe it never existed, a debate still remains on whether or not a consensus ever existed in British politics after 1945. Believers of "the postwar consensus" claim that it was formed because society was in need of repair after the devastating effects of the war, and there was a "need to maintain civilian morale and give people something to work for" (p. ...read more.


Since the breakdown of the consensus, politics is seen to have become more divided. The question is, however, over whether or not the postwar consensus actually existed in the first place. Critics of the consensus are quick to point out that during the alleged years of the consensus, there was considerable disagreement between the main parties. In the view of Kavanagh & Morris (1989) the consensus does not explain the true reality of British politics: "disagreement about ends and means is the life blood of politics. Political disagreement arises inevitably from human diversity and clash of individual and group interests" (p. 10) Kavanagh & Morris look back to the views of Ben Pimlott, who believed that politicians in the 1960's and 1970's were divided on fundamental issues. Pimlott (1989) argues against the consensus by claiming that from the mid-1960s and onwards, Conservative opposition to the principles of universality became more and more significant. Two areas which Kavanagh & Morris believe help to support Pimlott's thesis are education and immigration. Evidence over the past few decades has shown that Conservative and Labour Governments have differed in their views of schooling. Having witnessed the Labour Government in 1965 make comprehensive education compulsory, the new Conservative Government withdrew the order in 1970. ...read more.


pre-1979 era: "The thesis's ability to organise a contrast between the pre-1979 and post-1979 eras and thereby provide definition to the extent of supposed transformation in both periods, has meant that the idea of consensus remains an important myth across the whole political spectrum" (p. 73) He claims that the consensus has limited appeal in attempting to explain the complex governmental activities which followed the war and instead only helps us to understand the contribution of ideas from people such as Keynes and Beveridge in the postwar era, as well as showing how Thatcherism managed to turn these elements upside down. The idea that a consensus existed between the mid 1940s after the Second World War until the late 1970s when Mrs Thatcher came into office has helped us to understand how British politics was generally in agreement over fundamental issues concerning the welfare of Britain. However, the view that such a consensus ever existed has been seriously contested, since many commentators have pointed to many areas where different political parties have been in disagreement and that changes in policies have only have always been challenged by the opposition. Even so, the idea of "the postwar consensus" has remained popular today and is taken for granted by many historical, political and social commentators, so its contribution to British politics can hardly be doubted. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree International Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree International Politics essays

  1. How has the success of the Extreme Right in France come about and what ...

    However, one factor that contributed to the failure of 2007 was the fact that may more voters turned out, with around 8 million more people voting than in 2002. This had the effect of contracting Le Pen's share of the vote (Shields 2010 p34).

  2. Free essay

    Eu politics, Europeanisation

    Perhaps this may tell us that in the future the EU, while limiting member states sovereignty wishes to be seen as a lone state with its own sovereignty. This restriction of sovereignty is exercised in many other forms. In order to understand this concept, one shall be focusing on the euro and Monetary Union, noting Italy and Greece's painful adaption.

  1. Does Liberalism best explain contemporary world politics?

    The existing EU countries have chosen to extend the union because they see the value of the gains in absolute rather than relative gains. I believe that policy makers within Europe have acted in a liberal way and thus to me liberalism best explains the decisions made by leaders in Europe.

  2. UN reform

    Permanent membership is the aim of several countries like: Brazil, Germany, India, Japan, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa. According to the Thomas Weiss Un need to make reforms in quantity of members in Security Council. As he clearly mentioned if numbers of members would be 21 or 25 it will increase effectiveness of UN much more.

  1. Does patronage politics provide an effective vehicle for political participation?

    Per´┐Żn's mass support from the normal everyday people was brilliantly summed up by the repose of the people of Argentina when he got arrested. There were wide spread protests, which "[c]ulminated in a mass rally on 17 October in the Plaza de Mayo where 300,000 ensured Peron's mythic status by

  2. Critically evaluate post-war realist explanations of international politics with particular reference to power

    Thus, power is necessary in order for a state to survive or to defend itself against the encroachments of rival states. Thus, realism asserts that "the meaning of security is subsumed under the rubric of power"8. States have to rely on their own capabilities (i.e. their ability to exercise power)

  1. Power and Politics

    Power is the ability to make things happen, and politics is like the art of obtaining power. If people do not have power of their own, they need to find someone who does and influence him or her to make their things happen.

  2. Critically examine how Terrorism impacts upon world Politics in the Post-Cold War era.

    It has crippled the law institutions and orderly governments and threatened to destroy their economies by damaging trade, vital resources, and discouraging investors. In parts of Lebanon and Sri Lanka whole areas have been labelled 'ungovernable'. This is one of the key problems for Western countries in their quest against

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work