In what sense does Feyerabend's critique of positivism go beyond that of Kuhn?

Authors Avatar

Philosophy of Social Science

Heather Sadeghian

In what sense does Feyerabend’s critique of positivism go beyond that of Kuhn?

 It is the purpose of this essay to provide a clear understanding of the various arguments for and against positivism with the main views from philosophers of the social science Feyerabend and Kuhn.

 The positivists dominant approach to Social Science during the 19th and into the 20th Century has been widely criticised because of the ‘narrow’ and ‘hypocritical’ way in which it is seeks to explore and explain human conduct by using methods that are akin to the study of the natural science.  The essay will show that in relation to the exploration of the ‘one’ truth, that the relationship between ontology – the study of what actually exists, epistemology – the study of what knowledge is, and methodology – the ways in which the world can be studied.  Is an extremely diverse subject, especially when applying it to the study of the human being.  

Join now!

 The introduction will provide a brief insight into the historical development of the natural science, especially physics and the influence this had on the positivists approach.  

‘I do not know what I may appear to the world; but to myself I seem to have been only like a boy playing on the seashore, and diverting myself in now and then, finding a smoother pebble or a prettier shell than ordinary, whilst the great ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before me.’      

                            ...

This is a preview of the whole essay