Is Chinese society becoming more socially diverse? What are the major social sources of conflicts in Chinese society today?

Authors Avatar

City University of Hong Kong  
SA2702 The People’s Republic Of China

Individual Paper

TA4 Tutor: Isabel, Jie Gao 
Student: Tangerine, Yuen Ching Ching 51466021

Theme: Is Chinese society becoming more socially diverse? What are the major social sources of conflicts in Chinese society today?

A. Introduction
What was the Chinese society before the reform?
 
In Mao’s Period, the Chinese society was a reverse pyramid: the farmers and workers were at the top of the society structure. Also, there was class struggle at that time. In addition, egalitarian principle was concerned the wages. Although people have low wages at that time, they have the high social security. In that period, there was some organizations : Firstly, the Work Unit system, which was the work unit provided to their worker social welfare, likehousing, childcare, recreation, and so on. Secondly, The Urban Community organisation, which was the resident organisation and provided social surveillance, resident activities, and so on. Thirdly, The People’s Commune, which was between 20,000 – 30,000 people shared everything in rural area, from lands to kitchen.

In the following, I will explain two parts:
Firstly, I will explain why
the Chinese society is becoming more socially diverse, which is based on 4 reasons:

  1. New social categories of wealth and power emerged
  2. Two-class structure has been re-stratified

New elite groups

Middle Class

The urban workers

The migrant Workers

The Peasants

  1. Five major socio-economic categories
  2. More personal freedom

Secondly, I will describe six major social sources of conflicts in Chinese society today, which are:

1. There are limited financial resources
a. Peasants, migrant workers and coal miners are at the  bottom of the social hierarchy.

        b. There are the widening gaps urban and rural development, rich and poor, and different regions in recent years.

c. The social welfare are also lacked in China

2.   There are not many people who help the underprivileged
a.  Business people
b. The intellectuals and elites

  1.   There are inadequate built-in mechanisms which help the  underprivileged
  2.   Chinese media do not speak out for the poor, the           underprivileged and the weak.
  3. There is the value erosions
  4. Polarization and inequality
    Gini coefficient
    The reason of polarization of rich and poor / inequality
    a.  The widening gap between regions
    b.  The impact of accession to the WTO


B. Is Chinese society becoming more socially diverse?
In my point of view, I think that the Chinese society is becoming more socially diverse. In the following, I will have a further explain of this.
a. The new society

During the reforms in 1978, in order to achieve modernization, it shattered the Chinese society. The reform was mainly in favour a market economy since pragmatism encouraged the abandonment of the planned economy. Because of this, new classes are developed– Five new majors’ socio-economic categories, which are : Upper level, Middle-upper level, Middle-middle level, Middle-lower level and The lowest.


Regarding the middle class or the revival of the bourgeoisie, there was any middle class under Mao’s Period. This social class was born from the economic reforms. Around 200 million of Chinese people are considered as middle class, which is just small proportion of the population.

 

Regarding the lower class or the losers of the economic reforms, they are the urban workers, the migrant workers, the peasants and are represented 14% of the workforce.

b. New social categories of wealth and power emerged
Regarding to the new social categories of wealth and power, they are included government administrators, big enterprise managers, private entrepreneurs, professionals, clerks, private industry and commercial operators and employees in service industry.

In contrast, the social categories which are lack of wealth and power are included workers, farmers and unemployed.


They are the difference since the ideology and politics are not a main factor affecting the social stratification. Also, there are some evidences to prove this: Firstly, the discriminatory social class system was abolished (People VS enemies); secondly, Mao’s insistence of class struggle was abandon; thirdly, relaxation of the Hukou system, which allows more geographical mobility; fourthly, economic reform has redistributed wealth and power; and fifthly, higher education resumed in 1977.

c. Two-class structure has been re-stratified
i. new elite groups
  Political elites are included top state officials, high- and middle-ranking local  officials, and functionaries of large state-owned, non-industrial institutions.

 
Economic elites are included the managers of state bank and large-scale state enterprises, the owners of large or medium private firms and the owners of large or medium private companies.

At the end of 70s and early of 80s, private enterprise appears which the major tax base of the government is. Therefore, they are more important to the government than before, and so their legal position has gradually altered and their general quality has improved. Also, as educational level is higher, laymen with a barely acceptable education become a stratum.

In addition, they would like to participate in the politics more, and so they create some organizations. For examples, The All China Association of Entrepreneurs and Commerce (ACAEC), The People’s Congress and the Political Consultative Committee (PCC) and they own newspaper, like Chinese Business Times. Until 1996, more than 5400 private entrepreneurs were selected or recommended as members of People’s Congress above country level ; more than 8500 as members of the PCC; close to 1400 as committee members in the Youth League. In 2000, Jiang Zemin, the former president, gave a speech claiming the regime was going to absorb private entrepreneurs as Communist Party members.

Join now!

Regarding to the intellectual elite, they experienced drastic splits and fractures Era:

Intellectuals were dismissed as “stingy ninth-rankers”. Also, Communist and Maoist critique and purge of intellectuals aborted intellectual critique during the Anti-Rightist Movement, Cultural Revolution purge of intellectuals and cadres.

However, at the beginning of the reform era, the publication of an official article under the title “The Spring of Science” offered an encouraging signal to intellectuals.  

Before the reform, the intellectual elite are the main social support within the party. However, because of the inequalities generated by marketization, they only gained very little from the economic reforms. Also, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay