• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is liberal democracy the best system?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Is liberal democracy the best system? Critically assess. There is no perfect way to organize societies because people are imperfect and therefore incapable of devising a system without flaws. Throughout history, governments of every sort have violated every imaginable human right. In light of such conditions, and with the knowledge that the individual is the building block of society, there is a strong argument to be made for liberal democracy being the best system. To begin, the question of why one system is better than others can only be asked in a theoretical way. This is because defining something as best is entirely subjective depending upon the criteria of evaluation. For example, some might argue that North Korea?s military dictatorship is oppressive and that is a terrible system because it suppresses private enterprise and generally violates fundamental human rights of its people. [1] Defining the governance system as terrible is based upon the idea that much value should be placed on the ability of individuals to exercise extensive personal freedoms. Accepting this assumption, the reasons that liberal democracy is superior to alternate systems such as military dictatorships, absolute monarchies, and others, becomes more clear. ...read more.


Perhaps most importantly, a liberal democracy is constructed in such a way that the majority is unable to oppress the minority as a result of the distribution of power. For instance in the UK we have a system which separates the legislative and the executive, thereby a check on the prime minister?s power is created; the House of Commons can call a vote of no confidence at any time and the House of Lords is able to delay any laws for up to a year. Of course democracies are not immune to corruption but they promote a check and balance system and transparent governance, making them accountable to their citizens. However, citizens do not always act within their rights to demonstrate their feelings about their governments, and low voting rates are a problem for liberal democracies. [3] This may be caused by a general disillusionment with the system, a lack of concern, or inaccessibility to voting areas?despite the origin it is unsettling that in many countries citizens who are able choose not to vote. Some might argue in favor of compulsory voting, however enforcing these laws calls into question the right of the individual to withhold their vote, as well as various other logistical problems and high costs. ...read more.


However, the only alternative would be to run the risk that unfair laws are difficult to change and corrupt or incapable governments could maintain their position of power far longer than they ought. Within the restrictions and confines of our ability to interact and understand one another and what is best for society, it is far preferable to leave a lot of room to make changes and adjustments. As history has shown us, the tide of majority opinion has ebbed and flowed in ways that would shock our ancestors. Finding a balance between the individual and society that maintains optimal liberties to each is challenging, however it is of utmost importance that a working system is focused on maintaining this balance. Although liberal democracy is as susceptible to mismanagement as any other form of government, it is the best system because it holds the welfare of individuals and society above all else. ________________ [1] North Korea ? The Hermit Kingdom. CBS News. January 15, 2006 <http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/01/12/60minutes/main1203973.shtml> [2] ?Political System". Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. 29 April 2011. <http://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/en/home/reps/eur/vgbr/infoch/chpoli.html> [3] ?International IDEA; Compulsory Voting?. Idea. Int. Retrieved 2011-04-26. [4] Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. Democracy: The God That Failed . Rutgers, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 2001. Hardcover. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Political Systems section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Political Systems essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Has Neofunctionalism Been Superseded By A New 'Liberal Intergovernmentalism&amp;quot; As Currently The Most Convincing ...

    5 star(s)

    Through realization that national solutions are insufficient to solve substantial problems, elites shift their activities and expectation to the supranational institutions. This leads to an increase in pressure for further integration. Cultivated spillover describes the pressure for integration exerted by the central institutions themselves.

  2. This paper aims to convince its reader that the Philippines would benefit from abandoning ...

    Accordingly, in a parliamentary system, a relatively poor but qualified candidate has a chance to become Prime Minister so long as members of parliament express their approval. Argument #2: Presidential system does not ensure efficiency of a president after elections.

  1. Regionalism in China and India. In India regionalism is accommodated through the federal ...

    accommodative of timely meeting the demands of the regions.16 Moreover, individuals should not conceive regionalism as a harmful phenomenon because it seems as if nationalism and regionalism are the same. However, the growth of regional values, loyalty and consolidation of regional forces may conflict with the central administration and government of India.

  2. The title question of this paper asks that we evaluate the degrees to which ...

    Foremost is the fact that in the House, the lower chamber, the fifty states of the Union are represented proportional to the size of their respective population. As one may surmise, this then creates a misrepresentation between the populace, giving larger states, such as California, the majority and thus allowing

  1. Canadian Health Care System

    conditions has been a long-term trend that has astronomically increased the costs of maintaining the system[6]. Thirdly, due to the aging population, specifically the baby boomer generation, there has been a growing demand for resources and treatment[7]. Lastly, as the wealthiest generation in Canadian history are reaching old age, there

  2. Violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause?

    Proponents claim that assisted suicide will be narrowly limited to those who are terminally ill, but these so-called "narrow" proposals will inevitably be expanded. The New York State Task Force on Life and the Law wrote in 1997: "Once society authorizes assisted suicide for ...

  1. Why has neither the UK nor the US adopted a system of proportional representation?

    which usually equates to a strong single party government. There are two advantages to this; the first is that it gives the voters a clear choice between these two main parties, usually one to the left of the political spectrum and one to the right.

  2. Comparative Politics:What roles have these divergent attributes of the civil societies of Korea and ...

    was most organized, versus 1.6 days lost in Taiwan in 1993, when the working class density was highest. (Fan, Yun, 2004) The capacity for the working class to mobilize in both countries can be compared when observing the amount of workers associated with labour disputes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work