• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is the role of the Far Right in influencing immigration policy-making in Europe exaggerated?

Extracts from this document...


Is the role of the Far Right in influencing immigration policy-making in Europe exaggerated? As a consequence of World War II the Far Right, and fear of, has never been far from the psyche and politics of the West. German National Socialism and Italian National Fascism are the most infamous examples of Far Right ideology and as such have left a legacy of what it means to be Far Right, to the point that any right-wing policy maker runs the risk of being called a Nazi or Fascist. These were by no means self-contained philosophies and were merely the greatest developments of the zeitgeist, and World War II served as something of a watershed for Europe. With the demise of Hitler and Mussolini, the Far Right was no longer something to be openly supported or even tolerated. There is no guideline for what it is to be Far Right, but the term is most often used to describe persons or organisations with populist, xenophobic or racist ideology. The term, thus, is often used interchangeably with neo-Nazi or ultranationalist and has been used to identify groups as unfamiliar with one another as the aggressively racist Ku Klux Klan of USA to the genocidal regime of Slobodan Milosevic. The ideology of such organisations are jingoistic and boast of a proud national history and identity, being tainted. The policies of such organisations are invariably anti-immigration or anti-integration and focus on scapegoating the immigrant, or "other", for all manner of social, economic or (increasingly) ...read more.


What Lepenisation leads to, therefore, is a strengthening of the Far Right as a lobby group. They will not win an election, but they will have the centre-right to their bidding, on a domestic level. With regards immigration policy, however, there is little empirical evidence to suggest that Sarkozy's regulations rise or fall with the popularity of the FN. The British National Party are currently Britain's foremost anti-immigration organisation, a descendant of the National Front and the Union of fascists. Founded in 1982, the BNP claims that "white Britons have become second-class citizens" and asserts that " asylum-seekers and immigrants are pushed to the front of the queue for housing, jobs and benefits". Perhaps benefitting from the growing Islamaphobia following 9/11, the BNP complete with suits and repackaged rhetoric began to garner increased support and in 2001succesfully ran for council seats in the North-West of England, not an area particularly known for its high levels of immigration. A poll in 2002, found that immigration ranked highly amongst the concerns of 40% British immigrants. At the same time, the Conservative leadership was weak and the BNP capitalised by targeting disillusioned centre-right voters. When the Labour Party chose to occupy BNP territory, and David Blunkett spoke of the children of asylum-seekers "swamping" schools it gave the BNP further legitimacy (Copsey, 2008). Since then, the British National Party has been a constant fixture on the political scene and has sensationally been invited onto the BBC's Question Time and interviewed in the mainstream press. ...read more.


Following internal conflict in 2007, the Far Right bloc of the European Parliament was disbanded and the few Far Right MEPs are viewed as non-aligned members, and thus are even more marginalised then their domestic counterparts. These Far Right MEPs, somewhat ironically, are opposed to the European Union and seek to have their state leave the Union, most prominently for boarder reasons. They are, as expected, a rather muted force in the European Parliament and have influence only to the extent that the European Union has set up a Consultative Committee to monitor the expression of racism and xenophobia" (El-Agraa, 2001) Whilst it is clear that immigration is a permanent fixture on the agenda across Europe, one cannot say with any conviction that this is at the behest of the Far-Right. As previously stated, European citizens tend to be anti-immigration and this has increased sine 2001. Also, as stated, there is little evidence of the Far-Right becoming dominant in the democratic process. With regards immigration policy, which is the subject for all manner of lobbying, and subject to external factors, the Far Right are marginal in the influence. What this essay can say for certain, however, is that the 21st century domestic policies of European nations is directly influenced by Far Right sentiment, particularly with regards Islam. Thus the case is not that the influence of the Far Right on immigration policy is being exaggerated, but rather that the influence the Far Right have as a lobby group on domestic policy, in regards to 1st and 2nd class immigrants is being understated. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Political Theories section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Political Theories essays

  1. The Advocacy Coalition Framework provides an interesting but incomplete account of the role of ...

    An example Campbell (2002) employs is Eyre and Suchman's case where greatly different sized countries will adopt nuclear weapons system of great technical ability, not as a response to military threat, but more as an ostensible alignment with nation states that are modern, independent and socially legitimate3.

  2. Turkish Foreign Policy Last 10 Years

    Peacefulness Another feature of Ataturk Period foreign policy was accepting peace as basis. The most beautiful example of this was given in the National Struggle. Even through the war, every effort was maintained in order to ensure peace by negotiations .As a soldier, as the person who knows best

  1. A Study of Nationalism and its relevance in Muslim States.

    almost every nationalist regime and movement in the Third World called itself "socialist" and many claimed to be "Marxist", while on the other hand large sections of the left in the advanced countries, including the non-Stalinist left and including some of Trotskyist lineage, had come to regard the national liberation movements and the socialist revolution as practically synonymous.

  2. Is Marx Right to Think the State Could Wither Away?

    However, once all property has been centralised and the bourgeoisie have been completely removed, class distinctions will completely disappear and, rather than working to gain property which no longer exists, all will work towards the common good.

  1. On what grounds, and in what circumstances, do you consider that the population of ...

    In short it may lead to what Buchanan describes as anarchy. 12 Buchanan's argument on anarchy contends that,"if secession is permitted there will be no end to it". 13 Buchanan positions the argument in moral terms; some claims for self determined secession are morally decisive and others are not.

  2. Why was neofunctionalism the dominant theoretical approach in the early years of European integration, ...

    With this recognition came the need for a supranational organisation in the form of the commission (McGowan 2007: 5), charged with ensuring fair competition and ensuring rulings are enforced the commission seemed to support the basis of neofunctionalism theory. The theories main opponents in the form of neo realists could

  1. Critically assess the claim that Terrorism is first and foremost a tactic, adopted for ...

    This highlights the implication that terrorism is inextricably connected to political motives. Indeed, if it is not it could potentially be contrived as a simple matter of crime. Therefore it is important to consider the motives in relation to the opportunities available when it comes to defining an act as that of terrorist persuasion.

  2. Power. A gets B to do something that he or she would not ...

    Not to the arrogant assertion of a privileged access to truths presumed unavailable to others, but rather to a cognitive power of considerable significance and scope: namely, the power to mislead. One-Dimensional Man: Marcuse wrote that an increasingly all-embracing ?one-dimensional thought? is systematically promoted by the makers of politics and their purveyors of mass information.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work