'Literature is a part of cultural history - The study of it may well include relations between men and women as well as issues of class and race' Do you agree?

Authors Avatar

Gillian M Hesketh        BA Yr 1 ENGLISH LLW        Literature/Cultural History

‘Literature is a part of cultural history. The study of it may well include relations between men and women as well as issues of class and race.’

Do you agree?

Literature can be both an intentional product of an individual or a consciousness of society and it’s ideology. According to Leavis, good literature is timeless, transcending the age and the place in which it was written. Human nature is unchanging, emotions, passions and worries are universal and continuous and these norms are reflected in literature. The writer surely cannot escape society and the effects of the cultural beliefs of the period when writing. Literature is shaped because authors are writing about what they see and experience in their era and environment, some looking ahead and prophesising. Raymond Williams (Macey p.398, 2000) states, ‘it is not ideas that have a history; it is society.’ A number of things inform reading, the way we are trained, gender, race, and class all aid the construction of the way we read a text and influence our responses.

An early example of the effect of culture upon literature can be seen in Geoffrey Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. Chaucer’s many activities in the fourteenth century as auditor, justice of the peace and knight of the shire brought him into association with the ruling classes. A member of King Edward’s personal household, Chaucer would have been influenced on his diplomatic missions by the cultures of Spain, France and Italy. As poet and author, these cultural opportunities must have inspired Chaucer. He wrote lyrical poetry modelled on the famous French and Italian poets. Troilus’s song in Troilus and Criseyde is reportedly Chaucer’s translation of Petrarch’s sonnet. Canterbury Tales observes society and the culture of Chaucer’s epoch, satirising religion and the class system by illustrating stereotypical individuals, often inverting their roles within society. Chaucer’s middle class youth amongst the mercantile atmosphere of London’s Vintry to his elevated position amongst aristocracy gave him an insight into the class structural system. Gaining ideas from Gower and Boccaccio’s tales. Chaucer also drew from the culture around him; The honourable and moral, chivalrous, wealthy knight emphasises the ruling classes impression of themselves, the ironic Pardonner’s Tale, the ridiculed Prioress and the poor Ploughman, who represents the lower classes. The Wife of Bath’s tale presents us with women who are either pristine and virginal, so pure that they are unattainable or cunning and deceitful. The experienced Wife of Bath boasts of her five husbands, pointing out that happiest marriages are where the wife is the boss and that women should have mastery over their husbands, presenting early feminist points of view.

Chaucer’s literature is part of culture as it reflects and is affected by the social climate of the time. This view of society has been set in literature, which can still be accessed today, allowing us to see how culture maintained the class system of the time.

The national poet, Jim Macool has re-produced Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales using the same structure and technique in his own re-wording of the tales. McCool has engaged the moral sense and meaning of the literature from the fourteenth century and rewritten it in modern day language, set amongst a twentieth century background, a rendition, which is performed currently throughout United Kingdom. McCool’s performance poetry proves that the literature describing the culture of the fourteenth century is now part of twenty-first century literature.

Joseph Conrad’s life experiences in the Congo indisputably affected, indeed created the novel Heart of Darkness.  Conrad wrote in his Author’s note:

‘Heart of Darkness is experience, too, but it is experience pushed a      little (and only a very little) beyond the actual facts of the case for the perfectly, I believe, purpose of bringing it home for the minds and bosoms of the readers.’ (Kimbrough, p.4,1988)

During the difficult journey into the heart of the jungle, Conrad presents the horror, which lies beneath the surface of King Leopold II’s Congo Free State. The literature has been produced because of the actual historical occurrences and Conrad’s view that social opinion was lacking, therefore, the novel is a product of its context, communicating the exploitation, imperialistic rule and colonialism. Throughout this novel, we can identify the racist language, descriptions and the inevitability of hierarchal systems being set in place. Chinua Achebe called Conrad ‘a thoroughgoing racist’ (Kimbrough, p257,1988). Conrad fashioned his historical findings into a novel, entwining albeit racist views of African culture and historical facts, highlighting not only slavery and colonialism but also race and feminist issues. The story focuses on white male dominator’s experience rather than the colonised tribes. Conrad presents his picture of imperialism, ‘a white man in such unexpected elegance of get-up … a high, starched collar, white cuffs … a clean necktie … under a green-lined parasol held in a big white hand’, (Kimbrough, p.21,1988), represents an unsoiled and pure culture and symbolises power and superiority over black natives, who are presented as faceless and speechless, ‘black shapes crouched, lay, sat between the trees … clinging to the earth.’ (Kimbrough, p.  1988) Chinua Achebe criticised Conrad for his account in the Congo, calling him a traveller with a closed mind, blinkered by his European views of Africans. Conrad’s descriptions of the natives as ‘niggers’, coupled with his inability to give them a language raises questions of racism. ‘The edge of a black and incomprehensible frenzy’ (Kimbrough, p.37, 1988), infers that the natives are unintelligible.  The novel is full of ambiguities; everything in the novel is cloaked in darkness, mist, fog or gloom, symbolising the inability to see creates a distortion. The river, described as a snake symbolises deceit and cunning and the underhand activities of the colonisers, the exploiters. Heart of Darkness offers a powerful condemnation of hypocritical operations of imperialism that can be explored throughout the novel with inefficient scenes of bureaucracy and prominent scenes of torture and cruelty. The Manager tortures a native boy for allegedly starting a fire. The Company describe their business as ‘trade’ yet it becomes clear that Kurtz rules with violence, intimidation and force. In the treatment of natives, Marlow describes; ‘Black shapes crouched … in all attitudes of pain … fed on unfamiliar food, they sickened, became inefficient, and were then allowed to crawl away and rest’, (Kimbrough, p.20,1988), with the knowledge of history, it is clear these men were left to die.

Join now!

The colonisers proposed to bring light and civilisation to the African natives yet their intentions included the repression of the natives, resulting in racism. Africans are often associated with madness in many texts relating to the idea of a wild man. The wild tribe is therefore seen as a threat to society. The imperialistic idea is to civilise the natives while at the same time, dominate them. The Africans were stripped of humanity by colonialism. The local tribes were portrayed as cannibals, almost without a language, ‘words that resembled no sounds of human language’ (Kimbrough, p.66,1988), barely human, with ...

This is a preview of the whole essay