• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Offer an analysis of chapter 13 of Hobbess Leviathan.,. Your analysis might include the following: What are the crucial elements contributed by this chapter? What does Hobbes understand by our natural condition?Are there any unwarranted a*s

Extracts from this document...


Assignment 2.Offer an analysis of chapter 13 of Hobbes's Leviathan. You should use continuous prose for this, not bullet points or a list. Your analysis might include the following: 1. What are the crucial elements contributed by this chapter? 2. What does Hobbes understand by our natural condition? 3. Are there any unwarranted assumptions or logical inconsistencies in the argument in this chapter? Can you identify any inconsistencies in Hobbes' reasoning? 4. Do you find the claims advanced here especially convincing or flawed? If so, why? Thomas Hobbes, an English Philosopher from the 17th century, wrote a book on the topic of human nature and also its connection to the government. In chapter 13 of Hobbes Leviathan, Hobbes talks about how men of nature are all equal to one another. ...read more.


As an equal in culture and society in which he resides, every man thinks he ought to be able to have whatever he wants, even when others yearn the same. These men will strive for the object of interest, alongside with all others who desire the same object, ultimately resulting in war and man against man. The nature of man is described as three component, competition, diffidence and glory. These are the natural state of man. Each man possesses these components in order to gain power or success. As mentioned before, man will compete and ultimately fight in war. Furthermore, Hobbes talks about natural condition if mankind. Natural condition of mankind is what would be if there were no civilization, no government, no laws, and no common power to control human nature. ...read more.


Hobbes claims that man will compete with man in order to get what he wants, but for peace man must give up some of his desires because he fears death. The problem here is that if man is equal to man and we think (naturally) alike, why should one have to give up his desires? Surely competition can be healthy bringing about success. If every man gave up some desires then they would be at the bottom of their field. If competition and glory are natural then how is it possible to change this? Natural states are pure and embedded in man thus, instead of trying to prevent development of these qualities it should be encouraged to maximize human ability. Yet, Hobbes argument of man vs. man is convincing in hindsight. Men do compete and ultimately leads to rivalry and war. But, humans are fundamentally driven by happiness and the principle of giving up their desires and goals would be idyllic but isn't realistic. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Political Theories section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Political Theories essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    What are the strengths and weaknesses of a positivist/empiricist approach to political analysis?

    If qualitative methods were used, then the results and conclusions could not be developed into generalised statements or predictive models because interpretation lacks objectivity. Positivism can develop theories that explain political phenomena that can be generalised to other situations and times.

  2. How persuasive is Thomas Hobbes case for supposing that human nature is so constructed ...

    If these are familiar patterns of 'bad' behavior when there is law and custom and good manner to restraint people, what would happen if there was no law to govern the 'human nature' when allowed to express itself (Bunnin and Tsui-James, 2003)?

  1. A Study of Nationalism and its relevance in Muslim States.

    Marx has here put his finger on the fundamental characteristic of the peasantry, determined by the social conditions of its existence - its incapacity for self-emancipation. The peasantry can fight, and does so with extraordinary ferocity, but it cannot become the ruling class of society.

  2. Why, for Hobbes, must every man 'endeavour to Peace', and why might it be ...

    In my opinion it is hard to tell whether Hobbes thinks we are obliged and bound to do so or whether we just should seek peace as it is a rational thing to do for everyone living in the state of nature (i.e.

  1. Cold War

    Thus, the desire for natural resources or illicit drugs draws the top-layer countries into addressing the third-layer countries' difficulties and pave ways for the bottom to reach the top. Globalized Model Globalization, the free flow of commerce across borders making the world one big market, has emerged since the Cold War ended.

  2. What are the key features of sovereignty for Hobbes?

    constant battle between individuals in the state of nature is "nasty, brutish, and short"3 This is because as Hobbes says there are three main causes of quarrel: competition, diffidence, and glory. On the other hand these causes of quarrel can be seen in all societies which live outside the state of nature.

  1. Choice Book Analysis

    good that has less comparative cost is the main basis for free trade today. He was inspired from Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations who is accepted as the father of modern economy and creator the theory of Absolute Advantage in economy.

  2. A critical analysis of Wollstonecraft's reaction to Rousseau

    that this interest demonstrates that they are instinctively interested in looking after others, thus proving that a housewife is the natural role for a woman. Moreover, he argues, ?little girls always dislike learning to read and write, but they are always ready to learn to sew?[12]; surely this shows that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work