The Greater London Authority estimates that 380,000 undocumented migrants live in London, representing about 5% of its population. A survey by the Home Office of illegally resident detainees found that most had lived for at least some time in London, and two-fifths had never spent any time outside the capital. Though this was based on a small sample, it seems likely that most undocumented migrants will have spent some time in London as it is the main port of arrival from overseas. As such, they add to the churning of London's population,
Economic and social structure of London
London’s population growth is environmentally unsustainable, from a national and international point of view, and if it is environmentally unsustainable it is also economically unsustainable, for without ecologically healthy land our economy will not be able to support its own people without causing damage to the environment of other nations. Overcrowding is one of the most difficult issues faced by some residents of housing associations in London. There are not enough larger family homes available to meet people’s needs. Overcrowding restricts Londoners reaching their full potential and can have a devastating impact on family life. It can cause or contribute to poor physical and mental health; family breakdown; lower educational attainment due to a lack of space for children to study or relax; and disadvantage in the labour market.
The current wave of globalisation has been driven and facilitated by several
developments which have not previously occurred together. These are:
The adoption of more open economic policies – which have increased
international trade in goods and services, and cross-border flows of both
capital and labour;
Technological progress – which has sharply lowered transport and
Communication
The UK economy has continued its long-term structural change during the past
ten years with, broadly speaking, a continuing shift in terms of the shares of
output and employment from manufacturing towards services (although the
shift away from manufacturing is more moderate in output terms than in
employment terms)
Since the 1990’s there has been a fear of the ageing population which has now become a trend, this trend is known as the baby boom generation .The baby boomers were born during a period of rapid population growth and social change between 1946-64, with 17m births recorded in Britain alone during this period. Within the past 20 years this has been reflected on London’s population as those born at this time are now beginning to reach retirement age and are set to have a dramatic effect on the people, society and the economy of Britain. One of the greatest concerns is that with the retirement of the baby boomers, the number of people of a working, taxable age is decreasing, as a result of this the city of London will soon experience gaps in the jobs market, with businesses and public services lacking the workforce required. With the elderly being the fastest growing age group in Britain, increasing pressure is being put on healthcare and social services.
“In the late 90’s London was the largest city in Europe. As the centre of government of a massive empire, London continued to grow at a phenomenal rate: in geographical size, in the numbers of souls it contained, and in its economic prosperity. But for all its wealth and brightly lit palaces, there remained districts of extreme poverty and squalor. And while its economic institutions and trading infrastructure grew ever more sophisticated, it was not until relatively late in the century that it acquired a centralized structure for management and planning. Governed by the London County Council, the city entered the twentieth century facing new challenges, including the dangers posed by motorised traffic and the direct action committed by the Suffragettes”. Porter, Roy, London a Social History (London, 1994)
There has been an expeditious growth in London’s economy. Since the 1990’s the capital has retained significant problems of high levels of unemployment and economic inactivity. These problems lead to the situation where one of the richest cities in the world experiencing high levels of poverty. Since 1993, London had experienced a trend of falling unemployment levels. According to the Labour Force Survey, London’s unemployment peaked at 14.3 per cent in the last quarter of 1993, falling to 6.2 per cent in the third quarter of 2007. Throughout this period, London’s jobless rate has remained on average 2.3 per cent higher than that for the nation as a whole. The most recent figures show the gap between London’s unemployment and that of the UK at just 0.8 per cent, the lowest differential in over 15 years, suggesting that London’s economy has continued to create jobs in the face of a nationwide economic slowdown. Other labour market statistics confirm that exclusion from the job market is more prevalent in London than elsewhere: in the three months to November 2007, the employment rate for people of working age in the capital was 70.3 per cent, compared to a national figure of 74.7 per cent. In the same period, 24.6 per cent of Londoners were classified as being economically inactive, against 21 per cent nationally.(Labour force survey 2000)
London was an executive centre for both the nation and the empire as well as for banking its economic and social structure reflected this. Accompanying the changes in London's economic structure have been changes in its occupational structure. Key changes ment that there was a great decline within the manufacturing.Changes in occupational structure are important because they shape the socioeconomic and income distribution of cities. But they cannot simply be read off from changes in industrial structure, not least because people do not always live where they work. Large numbers of commuters work in London but live outside it, and in the last 30 years London has seen a net loss of population by out-migration of about 1.5m people. As the out-migrants are generally more skilled than nonmigrants, this has led to fears that the occupational structure of London's residents is shifting downwards.
In conclusion London has experienced a tremendous impact which has evolved and enhanced over the years, the evidence within this essay has shown how the city of London has been through such transformation, Although the city has been through many changes
ANDERSON, M. (ed.) (1996) British Population History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
ANDERSON, M. (1996) 'Population Change: Trends and Patterns and Movement' in Anderson, M. (ed.) British Population History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
HALSEY, A.H.and Webb, J. (2000) Twentieth Century British Social Trends. Basingstoke: Macmillan