• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17

The Public Sphere in Singapore

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Asia 001: Group Essay Term II, 2009/10 Section: G1 Instructor: Assistant Professor Hoon Chang Yau Submitted by: Charmaine Su Mei Qi Emmanuel Benedict Lee Wei Liang Jolene Tan Shu Ann Josephine Chee Fei Lee Hui Min We declare that this group essay contains 2,937 words. I. Abstract This paper seeks to examine the Habermasian notion of the public sphere in the Asian context. With specific reference to Singapore, we will mark the development of civil society, taking into account both local and global factors. At its conclusion, we hope to answer the question of whether a vibrant public sphere is integral to the continued development of Singapore in the future. II. Habermas' Notion of the Public Sphere The modern-day conceptualisation of the public sphere can be traced back to ideas expressed by Jurgen Habermas who conceived it primarily as an arena for private individuals to come together as a public to engage in rational and critical debate (Habermas, 1962). Not only was the public sphere perceived to be distinct from state authority, it also functioned as a 'site for the production and circulation of discourses that were critical of the state' (Fraser, 1990: 57). By acting as a check on state power and authority, the notion of the public sphere is essential to the proper functioning of participatory democracy (Calhoun, 1992). This can be seen in contemporary Western societies, where political action and discourse is largely shaped and influenced by public opinion (Behnhabib, 1992: 87). Thus, the notion of a vibrant public sphere has been traditionally conceived as a means to constantly question the effectiveness and necessity of governmental action. III. Overview: The Public Sphere in Asia Unlike the Western conception, the public sphere in Asia functions less as a check on government but more as a tool to aid development. In Asia, any attempt to divorce the public sphere from the political context is impossible (Birch, Schirato & Srivastava, 2001: 89). ...read more.

Middle

V. The Success of our Approach Thus Far The idea of a "vibrant" public sphere is anathema to Singapore's developmental strategy due to the prioritisation of economic development and social order over other goals (Hor, 2001). Thus, it is not surprising that the Singapore government exercises significant control over the public sphere. Interestingly, Singapore has taken a further step in adopting the public sphere as a tool for nation building. More disturbingly, the public sphere has also been used to suppress political opposition by not only denying them the ability to spread their ideas, but also by actively portraying them in a negative manner (Seow, 1998). This is contrary to the Harbermasian notion of the public sphere. Indeed, the process of becoming "Singaporeanized" is characterized as a state of becoming "politically inert and economically dynamic (M.C. Davis, 1999). As a result of this policy of depoliticisation, the public sphere has been brought into alignment with goals such as "nation building" (Birch, Schirato & Srivastava, 2001: 90). This is further propagated by the nation's leaders in their highly paternalistic approach to government. In other words, the collective mindset of society has also contributed to the formation of a "domesticated" public sphere. As can be seen, the notion of the public sphere in Singapore is mostly top-down and bears little resemblance to Habermas' ideal. What was originally envisioned as a check on state power and authority has instead become a tool for government control. While one might be tempted to castigate Singapore's vestige of a public sphere as a mere product of an authoritarian regime operating behind the guise of democracy, it is undeniable that this approach has served Singapore well thus far. During Singapore's early years, there was grave social unrest as a result of the communist threat, racial riots, and frequent demonstrations and worker strikes (S Jayakumar, 2000). The unfettered freedom to publicly air one's views, no matter how controversial, would likely lead to greater unrest and upheaval. ...read more.

Conclusion

Such unprecedented progress was in no small part attributed to sound and efficient government policies, which not only provided for Singapore's rapid economic development, but also set the necessary groundwork for growth in maintaining social and political stability (S Jayakumar, 2000). The success of Singapore's development hinged on the integration of economic, political and social goals and it is plainly evident that the government has exercised a significant amount of control in all three areas, arguably with mostly positive results (Srivastava, 1998). However, such an approach may no longer be tenable in Singapore today. Bringing up Maslow's theory once again, now that Singaporeans have their basic needs satisfied; there have been calls for more liberalisation of the public sphere (Thio, 2002). As can be seen, due to recent global developments and the increased sophistication of Singaporeans, Singapore has been moving towards a more vibrant public sphere. A vibrant public sphere is important for continued economic, political and social development. Firstly, a vibrant public sphere checks governmental power by allowing private individuals a platform for criticism of governmental action. There is no guarantee that Singapore's leaders would remain "junzi" forever thus thoughtless deference to the government is not sustainable in the long run (Thio, 2002). Secondly, a vibrant public sphere also encourages discourse and allows the freedom for individuals to air their views. According to Maslow, this freedom is important for helping individuals achieve self-actualisation and in so doing, allow for the attainment of a more mature society (Maslow, 1943). Thirdly, this would in turn promote creativity and innovation among Singaporeans, both of which are important traits in today's economy (S Jayakumar, 2000). VIII. Conclusion Thus, in conclusion, while a "vibrant" public sphere has not been integral to our success to date, it is submitted that it is nonetheless important for our continued success in the future. In any case, despite governmental reluctance, it is in our view that forces, both international and local, would compel it in the right direction towards a more liberal and "vibrant" public sphere. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Political & Economic Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Political & Economic Sociology essays

  1. Discuss the factors which led to the rapid industrialisation of Japan

    One of the long-term effects of the embargo was an economic recession throughout the world. The era of economic growth, which had been in effect since World War two had now ended. For Japan this was a major problem, most of its new industries were heavily dependant on oil.

  2. The Social security system in Hong Kong. In the essay, we would concentrate ...

    In addition, the mean-test system of CSSA leads to an increase in the administrative cost of Government. People always have a negative impression towards CSSA recipients or even look down on them. The needy may then be reluctant to get the allowance because of the negative self image.

  1. Globalization. In terms of the novelty or emergence of globalisation, this essay shall ...

    related interactions as these networks have also proved to be good marketing strategies in order to spread the word and advertise goods and services globally (Cohen;Kennedy,2007,p.44-46;G.Ritzer,2010,p.286-294). The opportunities to communicate and to travel long distances so easily and quickly has therefore caused people to become more interconnected and raised our awareness of different countries and cultures.

  2. In this essay, I will discuss whether the Social Security invests in a diversified ...

    system that is based on individual accounts similar to the one imposed in Chile. Each employee and his employer will have to set aside 5% of worker's payroll. This payroll will be deposited to a firm which will be chosen by the worker.

  1. World City Aspirations & Urban Spatial Politics: The Case of Dubai

    Given its tabula rasa landscape and lack of any strongly preconceived historical image to uphold, Dubai continues to be engaged in this process of urban generation and reinvention with the aim of creating a city of regional significance for the twenty-first century (Pacione, 2005 p.265).

  2. How does technology of communication influence the nature and identity of community?

    the printing press might therefore be seen as having been a major cause for the rise of nationalism.? Printing had created the rush of knowledge and made mass communication available to everyone. However, another valuable point to take into consideration in relation to technology of communication influencing the nature and

  1. Can and should public policy decisions be based solely on scientific evidence?

    proposition, evidence supporting the claim and the set of assumptions that have assisted in shaping the question, selecting what will count as relevant evidence and the link between the evidence and the claim via conceptual processes (Toulmin & Janik, 1978: 4-6).

  2. What have been the government and community responses to the rioting in Bradford, Burnley ...

    (Ritchie 9:2001). According to Ritchie's report, we can say that in a way ethnic minority groups are being blamed for the segregation in society. There was a mixed response from the government and communities as a follow on from the riots. "Community cohesion" was put further up on the agenda for the government and more focus was also put towards it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work