• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Theories of Rights. John Rawls, one of the most celebrated contemporary philosophers, puts forward a compelling concept in A Theory of Justice (1971) which attempts to delineate the features of a just society by way of a hypothetical contract, grounded i

Extracts from this document...


Examine the persuasiveness of any one major theory of Human Rights post 1945 John Rawls, one of the most celebrated contemporary philosophers, puts forward a compelling concept in A Theory of Justice (1971) which attempts to delineate the features of a just society by way of a hypothetical contract, grounded in rationality, arrived at under ideal conditions (Dunne & Wheeler, 1999; Jones, 1994). Rawls (1999: 10) purposes a persuasive theory by presenting 'a conception of justice which generalizes and carries to a higher level of abstraction the familiar theory of the social contract' tied to earlier thinkers, such as John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Immanuel Kant. Undeniably, the contractarian aspect of Rawls's theory has had the greatest influential impact (Kukathas & Pettit, 1990), so much so that American intellectuals nominated Rawls to become a judge in the Supreme Court. However, despite this, some critics are yet to be persuaded by Rawls's notion of 'justice as fairness' (Alejandro, 1998; Boucher & Kelly, 1994). Using a hypothetical model Rawls considers how rights would be conceived in the original position (Freeman, 1991). According to Rawls (1971) cited in Wolff (1977) the 'original position' is a group of rational men and women who are roughly similar in needs and interests, suitably equal in power and ability and not envious, who come together to form a social contract (Dworkin, 1977). ...read more.


In addition to these, Rawls has more recently added freedom of movement and the free choice of occupation to the list (Hayden, 2001). Rawls's cited in Jones (1994: 129) justifies individuals having rights to these freedoms by stating that 'autonomous beings must be respected'. Rawls elaborates by claiming: "Equal voting rights and the other equalities associated with democracy are important, not for what they contribute to the process of decision making, but as public acknowledgements of the equal status accorded to individuals... people have a right not be treated in that publicly humiliating fashion" (Rawls, 1971 cited in Jones, 1994: 179) This highly evocative statement is a very persuasive way of confronting the reader with the demands of justice as fairness (Jones, 1994). Admittedly, Rawls advocates that the natural human is used to large array of primary goods, however it is perhaps more appropriate to suggest that these primary goods are reflective of consumer society. It is highly unlikely that natural society wants as much as Rawls suggests. In response to this criticism, Rawls refined and narrowed his definition of primary goods in later work (Jones, 1994). To ensure we have access to these primary goods, we would recognise a need to draft a code of conduct that we could all agree on. ...read more.


According to Rawls, the governmental institute we would have opted for in the original position would be democracy. Although there is no historical evidence to suggest we would naturally opt for democracy, it is persuasive to suggest we would reject utilitarianism due to its failure to acknowledge 'the separateness of persons', which could consequently result in majoritarianism (Jones, 1994: 62). After examining A Theory of Justice, it is fair to say, despite critical attention, Rawls is an impressive systemic thinker who has succeeded in restating liberalism in a persuasive and dramatic way. Rawls puts forwards an abstract and complex theory, crammed with arguments in attempt to remove any lingering doubts critics may still be harbouring (Barry, 1973). Although it may be epistemologically impossible for the parties to 'possess all and only the knowledge Rawls imputes to them' (Wolff, 1977: 72) and despite the veil of ignorance making the task of arriving at moral consensus infinitely easier than it really is (Dunne & Wheeler, 1999), upon reflection Rawls offers a convincing theory 'that would seem reasonable (perhaps even eminently plausible) to persons in others cultures or in other times' (Boucher & Kelly, 1994: 263). It is fair to conclude that Rawls's relentless attempt to present 'justice as fairness' has indeed led us all to subconsciously challenge the way in which we should make decisions about rights. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Theory section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Theory essays

  1. Discuss Marx's Theory of Value by Focusing on Abstract and Concrete Labour.

    The labour theory of value states that market prices are attracted by prices proportional to the labour time embodied in commodities. In other words, relative prices tend toward relative labour values. The labour theory of value is restricted to the analysis of reproducible commodities that have a use-value in a capitalist society.

  2. is there one childhood or many

    care and responsibility we wish could exist for the benefit of the child in non western countries. The children of the Congo. Upwards of 30,000 children have been actively engaged in fighting in DRC, of those who are no longer part of fighting forces at least 10,000 have been unable to reconnect with their families and communities.

  1. Compare and contrast one process theory of motivation with one content theory

    Process theories focus on how we make choices with respect to desired goals and give the individual a cognitive decision making roe in selecting goals and the means by which to pursue them, whereas content theories are based on the assumption that every individual has got the same set of

  2. Understanding Individuals and society.

    to an extreme, and everyone can manage the company and equally, everyone can do the everyday jobs that, that particular workforce does. Although a 'narco-syndicalist' organisation is a nice idea it wouldn't happen in today's 'modern' society; but that isn't to say that it won't be happening in the future.

  1. Stanley Cohens critique of Hebdiges reading of the symbolism of the swastika. The extract ...

    Some wore it to fit in with others, some because of plain stupidity or lack of knowledge while others did it for all three but all of which amounts to racism - voluntary or involuntary. "Rock against Racism was a campaign set up by Red Saunders, Roger Huddle" formed because

  2. Self and Society: Explain theories of Persuasion

    Psychologists have also suggested that the effects of repetition of a message strongly affect the overall persuasion. According to Arkes and colleagues (1991), simple repetition of a statement makes it appear more true, hence repeated exposure to an object or message increases its familiarity.

  1. Discuss the extent of which citizenship continues to be a gendered concept and consider ...

    It was put forward by Vogel that marriage was central to women?s exclusion from full citizenship and that marriage was used as a device to dominate females. Which saw men as citizens and women as not. ?Marriage which begins as a voluntary association between two citizens- two agents capable of

  2. This essay will look at how access to specialised medical knowledge makes decision-making in ...

    Our society is becoming increasingly more open to alternative medicine systems, such as those of homeopathy, herbal medicine and acupuncture. The increase in diverse sources of, sometimes contradictory, medical knowledge has led to more uncertainty about which medical expert or what medical knowledge to believe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work