Was American Indian policy wholly exploitative?

Authors Avatar

Was American Indian policy wholly exploitative?

Was American Indian policy wholly exploitative?

In 1830, Congress approved the Indian Removal Act proposed by President Jackson, which concerned removing the thousands of Native Americans onto the plains west of the Mississippi River, away from white social progress. Land was set aside as a "permanent" home for the American Indians in "territories", including most of Oklahoma and parts of Kansas and Arkansas, but by the end of the nineteen century, most of this "Indian frontier" had been opened to white settlers. In examining the issue of American Indian policy, and the extent to which it exploited the Native Americans, it is fundamental to investigate the historical relationship between the Native Indians and white settlers throughout the colonial period and through the later stages of American development; one should additionally study the priciples of land ownership, the varying attitudes towards the Indians following removal, from exclusion to Americanisation, and whether the experiences of the different tribal groups were universal or as diverse as their own cultures and customs.Unlike other ethnic groups that now dwell in the United States, Native Americans were the original residents of this country, neither brought to America by force, nor by immigration. The most probable explanation of how this continent's first human inhabitants arrived, some 15,000-25,000 years ago, was from Siberia to Alaska, either by traversing islands across the Bering Strait or by crossing Beringia, a broad land bridge, exposed by diminishing waters throughout the Ice Ages. The majority of these palaeo-Americans were hunter-gatherers, who established themselves in the forrested east coastal zone of America, on the grassy Great Plains, and in the western deserts. By the time that the first white settlers arrived in 1492, it is estimated that 2 million to 4.5 million native peoples were situated throughout North America. Christopher Columbus wrote of his initial experiences with the natives: "They invite you to share anything they possess, and show as much love as if their hearts went along with it...With 50 men they could all be subjugated and compelled to do anything one wishes."

There are several early examples of Indian-European cooperation, such as Indian Princess Pocahonta's assistance to explorer John Smith; a small proportion of the native nations were described by the white settlers as being the "Five Civilised Tribes", because of their willingness to negotiate and to conform to Western ways of living. These were the Muskogean-speaking nations of Chickasaws, Creeks, Choctaws, Cherokees and Seminoles, who originally inhabited the present Southeastern region of North America. However, the majority of early settlers treated the Native Americans with hostility and exploitation: Columbus' unsupervised soldiers raped the native women, and pillaged Indian villages, causing retaliation from Indian inhabitants. The French and English colonists that followed treated North America not as a continent inhabited by diverse peoples whose government and customs they must respect, but rather as a "virgin land", filled with resources, that was ripe for the taking. Settlers perceived the natives as "savages": a letter written by early anthropologist George Catlin described the "many evidences of the dark and cruel, as well as ignorant and disgusting excesses of passions, unrestrained by the salutory influences of laws and Christianity."

Join now!

Throughout the the seventeenth, eighteenth centuries, the European-American settlers fought with the Native American tribes, seizing their land and driving them further west. Attempts were made to enslave the native peoples and to explicitly define slaves as property; a law passed in 1705 in Virginia stipulated: "All Negro, mulatto, and Indian slaves within this dominion shall be held to be real estate and shall descend unto heirs and widows according to the custom of land inheritance." However, Indian slavery did not prove to be an efficient mode of servitude, as unlike their African counterparts, native slaves could easily escape and ...

This is a preview of the whole essay