• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why is the Common Agricultural Policy so difficult to reform?

Extracts from this document...


Ross Lucas GV244 Essay 3 Why is the Common Agricultural Policy so difficult to reform? The political stakes attached to CAP reform are high, with several groups having a vested interest in its future. The CAP was the first supranational policy of the EU, and some countries still hold a romantic attachment to rural culture, although now only 5% of the EU workforce is comprised of farmers, a figure which shrinks every year1. Yet this minority holds enough power to preserve CAP subsidies, against the interests of taxpayers and consumers. There are several reasons for this, the predominant one being that "there is greater institutional presence and activity in the agricultural field than in any other" 2. This applies to both the national and European level. Indeed the size and organisation of the EU farm lobby is greater than any comparative group, with potential countervailing forces being much smaller and less organised than the farm lobby. This essay will focus on three particular areas that make CAP difficult to reform; the susceptibility of national governments to pressure from the domestic agricultural community, the institutional bias in the EU towards agricultural interests and the asymmetry of interests towards CAP between consumers and farmers. ...read more.


Also instead of COREPER, the Agricultural Council is supported by the Special Committee of Agriculture, which is staffed by officials from national agricultural ministries, increasing the presence of officials sympathetic to agricultural, and the difficulties of passing any amendments that do not comply with the interests of farmers. It is very difficult for other ministers to pressure the Agricultural Council. It is not uncommon for there to be disputes between ministers. For example in the 1980's the German agricultural minister opposed proposals from the German finance minister to scale down CAP subsidies.8 Finance ministers can only get involved over key budgetary questions regarding the funding of the CAP, and the heads of government are only normally involved to negotiate the major reform packages. Therefore there is a broad policy area exclusive to the Agricultural Council, again making reforms contradicting the interests of wider agricultural community difficult to pass. The interests of farmers are also protected by the way the CAP is administered by the Commission. The agricultural commissioner in charge of proposing reforms to the CAP system has always been from a state with strong interests in farming, and often from a political party with ties to agricultural interests. For example Franz Fischler, an Austrian Christian Democrat9. ...read more.


This is partly because they view the production of food to be a worthwhile investment, and because farmers have won support by advocating there 'green role' as protectors of the environment and stressing the lack of other job opportunities in urban areas that already have high unemployment. This is particularly obvious in France where the government also offers support to farmers by stressing the value of farm exports to the balance of trade11. This reduces the incentive for the government to battle the farmers over reform, as it will be unpopular with farmers and non-farmers alike. To conclude, the power and influence of the broader agricultural community is behind the difficulty of reforming CAP. At the national level, farming officials retain privileged access to government ministers, and by not cooperating with reform programs farmers can prevent any controversial reform from working. National governments are afraid of losing the electoral support of farmers, and therefore don't challenge there power. At the European level agricultural interests are protected in the Council and the Commission, and by numerous highly organised lobby groups. Also the lack of transparency of the CAP subsidies in general mean the consumers and taxpayers that lose most from the policy, are largely indifferent to its existence. Therefore although minor reform has occurred, no significant programs will be passed until agricultural control at the European and national level is broken. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree International Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This essay is of a high standard and would likely receive a mark in the upper classifications (60-65+), depending on its adherence to the module outline and the expectations of the marker. It is well written, focuses tightly on the question, has a rigorous and logical internal structure which is signposted throughout, and makes a number of subtle points that I would associate with strong critical analysis. There are a small number of aspects that could perhaps be improved upon. The first is that the essay is somewhat myopic in focussing quite exclusively on the 'iron triangle' of EU institutions. Two other explanations for the difficulty in reforming the CAP that are often mooted are institutional inertia and path dependency, and a lack of convincing external pressures for change. These arguments often come to the fore when reform processes are examined (such as the McSharry reforms or Agenda 2000). Indeed, I think the primary way the argument could have been significantly strengthened would be to consider these reforms as points at which change has occurred, and to examine the nature of this change. What prompted these reforms? Are the pressures that pre-empted these reforms there usually, or were there exceptional circumstances? Raising the issue of change would allow for a brief examination of the counterfactual, and hopefully shed more light on why change occurs so rarely. Discussing the reforms would also help tick the 'independent knowledge' box. As it is, the author shows substantial subject familiarity, but the bibliography is a bit thin, and the critical engagement with the literature stands out as being weaker than the rest of the essay. Showing greater awareness of the analytical arguments of other authors, and engaging with them more directly, would have been helpful in elevating this essay from 'very good' to 'excellent'.

Marked by teacher Grace Thomas 30/11/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree International Politics essays

  1. Are states still the most powerful actors in global politics?

    Strange's definition of power as being, "gauged by influence over outcomes rather than mere possession of capabilities or control over institutions"12 suggests that there are multinational corporations which possess a higher level of political power than some states. ANALYSIS (5-6 pages)

  2. What are the major strength and weakness of realist tradition?

    Secondly, theories of realist tradition had also has underestimated the states abilities to overcome their differences and cooperate. The formation of European Union and its adoption of a single currency by most members would be impossible, if Realism were to hold true, as according to it the states would to

  1. Does globalisation undermine the nation-state and national identities?

    powers, the nature of organisations such as the United Nations means that there is little chance of undesired shifts of power away from the nation-state. These organisations have no independent authority or power and are entirely dependent on the collective decisions of states10.

  2. Kant's theory of international relations.

    Thus, the creation of the moral state is the unity of politics and morality. There is the politics of self-interest neutralization and the moral understanding that man's freedom as well as the other a priori principles must be upheld. As this civil society develops from the man's fear of losing

  1. Compare the role of interest and pressure groups in the UK, France and Russia.

    Finally the Elite viewpoint shares the argument of the New Right that pressure groups add nothing to democracy and ultimately benefit those already in powerful positions. This can clearly be seen in the case of Russia where Quasi-state interest groups dominate and allow the political elite to manipulate economic policy for their own gain.

  2. The game of Risk can be used as tool to understand the international system. ...

    The military build up eventually lead to the dissolution of the pact by a surprise attack from Daniel, aided by a new alliance with Paul to weaken North America by attacking Alaska. According to Spanier and Wendzel, security is the first objective of states,15 and alliances cannot supercede this goal.

  1. Is Media the fourth branch of power? Discuss.

    the political information he concluded that, the media cannot be fully democratic and trusted in many cases, because the modern society is too complex. The centrepiece of Lippmann's argument was that press will always have more than one opinion and they can be either wrong or right, but as long as the information comes from a journalist(and it always will)

  2. What is globalisation and is it a new phenomenon?

    products in all countries but they are also producing their goods in countries such as Thailand, even though their headquarters are always settled in the EU or the United States. One of the main and most powerful arguments that multinational companies put forward in favour of globalisation, is the fact

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work