Charismatic Leadership in Practice

Authors Avatar


INTRODUCTION

Leadership is not a science rather it is an art, a skill that can be developed. Previously it was thought that leaders are born and not made, leadership was considered as a gift, a magic that some people are born with and only those people can become successful and charismatic leaders, who can then develop followers. However, these concepts of leadership do not exist anymore, now it is considered as a trait, a skill that can be developed and learned. Bennis & Nannus (1985) observed and explained that leadership is a quality that can be developed and rejected the concept that “leaders are born and not made”.

Definitions of leadership by Bass (1990) and Yukl (1981) reflects the concept that it is a relationship process between individuals, in which the leader influences the followers to achieve the targeted goals also keeping the integrity of the group together. Contrary to the earlier theories of leadership (Great Man theory, Trait Theory) and influenced & inspired by the concept of transformational leadership by Burns (1978) and charismatic leadership by House (1976),   Bass (1990) developed the model of “transformational leadership” and stated that leadership is a constructive relationship between the leader, the followers and the goal/target/objective rather than the sole skills and traits of the leader.

Leaders can be divided into two main types, transformational and transactional. According to Curtin (2001; 239) “the transforming leader looks for potential motives in the followers, seeks to satisfy the needs and engages the full person of the followers. The result of transforming leadership is a relationship of mutual stimulation and elevation that converts followers into leaders and leaders into moral agents”. The author highlights the fact that even when a transformational leader is gone he lives in the mind of his/her followers in the form of his/her ideas and vision, exhibited by their actions. Bass & Riggio (2005) regarded transformational leadership as an expansion of transactional leadership. A transformational leader exhibits the traits and qualities of a transactional and charismatic leader.

In my opinion the concept of charismatic leadership and transformational leadership are very much overlapping and have many similarities, most important of which are envisioning, empathy and empowerment. Qualities of charismatic leaders as described by Conger and Kunungo (1998) exhibits a more transformational style of leadership such as vision, understanding the needs of members, and understanding of the environmental conditions and influencing members to rise beyond the goal by generating energy in them etc. “Charismatic and transformational leadership have many common traits” (Bass & Riggio, 2005; 05).

Emotional intelligence the term first introduced by Salovey and Mayer (1990) and then further described by Goleman (1995) further emphasizes the importance of relationship between leader and the followers and the role of feelings and self-awareness in the process of leadership. EI is the understanding of one’s/leader’s own emotions and feelings and that of the others/followers while marching forward towards the achievement of formulated target/goal (Goleman, 2001).                                                              

LEADERSHIP IN HEALTHCARE

As in business, aeronautical sciences, sports and politics, leadership in healthcare has also become one of the most debatable and researched topics. In the past decade leadership has gained great importance within the National Health Services (NHS) structure in United Kingdom (UK). The agenda of government of UK to modernise and change the NHS (NHS Plan, 2000) and the implementation of clinical governance (Department of Health, A first class service, 1998) have acted as drivers to develop and produce effective leadership within each department and also at individual levels within the NHS. Ineffective leadership is considered as one of the potential barriers that could affect the implementation of clinical governance (McSherry & Pearce, 2002). According to Stewart (1996) effective leadership is crucial for clinical governance and to observe its impact. Efficient leadership is not just important for motivating the followers/co-workers but is also of vital importance in providing better communication at various levels and in promoting multidisciplinary team approach. The teaching of leadership courses at the post graduate level in the universities and the development of NHS leadership qualities framework in 2002 by the Leadership Centre for Health are good examples of the magnitude of importance that this discipline has gained in UK’s health sector. Concept of leadership is not just required at the organizational level but also different professional and individual entities are required to adopt it for the growth of professions and professionals which may lead to the organizational stability, timely achievement of tasks, more job satisfaction among healthcare workers and an overall increase in quality of care.

Join now!

The concept of “leadership in healthcare practice” is something which lacks in developing countries like Pakistan. This lack of awareness of the importance of leadership qualities is probably responsible for the stagnant growth of the pharmacy profession in Pakistan, where the duties of pharmacists are still limited within the premises of pharmacy department. The government of Pakistan, healthcare professional bodies and universities have not yet explored the importance of leadership, although appropriate leadership is the biggest scenario that the country is facing at the national and political level. For the profession of pharmacy to grow in Pakistan and being better ...

This is a preview of the whole essay