• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do you consider these stereotypes accurate, and to what extent do you consider them distortions of the ways in which the sciences and the arts give us their knowledge?

Extracts from this document...


Jane Kwong 1679 words Popular stereotypes frequently present the scientist and the artist as extreme opposites in their pursuit of understanding- the scientist as being objective, disciplined and rational, and artist as being subjective, impulsive and imaginative. Yet are they really so different in the ways they look at the world? To what extent do you consider these stereotypes accurate, and to what extent do you consider them distortions of the ways in which the sciences and the arts give us their knowledge? Our world has been accelerated due to the advancement of both artists and scientists. For that, people have made stereotypes of these two professions in hopes of understanding them. These stereotypes are useful when it allows us to classify people that belong in each profession and have a general overview of them. However, it is catastrophic when it conjures wrong ideas about each expert as it would prevent people from really understanding who they are. Stereotypes occur as a result of attributing the supposed characteristic of a group to all of its individual members. Stereotyping assumes and emphasizes the uniformity within a group and exaggerates the differences between them. Scientists are stereotyped as being objective, disciplined and rational while artist are to bee subjective, impulsive and imaginative. These stereotypes are ultimate opposites in their way of understanding. ...read more.


Is there really such a thing as scientific objectivity? When scientists are not really being objective are when they are so certain of their theory that they try to make the obtained results fit to their theory. When this happens we can see that scientists are not trying to discover the laws of nature from the data as we think but instead the opposite. This is how Mendel's pea experiment conclusion came to be, from selective data. Also surprisingly, some of the greatest discoveries scientists made on earth are only made possible because logic went hay wired and reasons abandon. Radioactivity, one of the most monumental discoveries in history, has been discovered by Henri Becquerel through illogicality. He is led by a belief that certain rocks emit X-ray due to his interest in minerals that fluorescence after exposure to sunlight. His original experiment purpose, where he is trying to see whether minerals fluorescence after exposure to sunlight, has failed several times and because of his frustration, he built a photographic plate where he found the undiminished intensity of the rays in the dark. He then concludes that there could only be one explanation, because the rays that come from the uranium mineral are not only triggered by sunlight but also with another obvious external agent. ...read more.


That's why Leonardo da Vinci would often be classified as both a great artist and scientist. Scientists need to be creative, and sometimes impulsive for them to make discoveries. If scientists just takes a backseat after each discovery or theory is made, we might not know for certain if it is in fact the truth. Using the same example of the heliocentric and geocentric solar system model, we might still have not discovered that we are in reality rotating around the sun and not the other way around if it was not for scientists rethinking the solar system model theory. A great scientist relies on intuition and imagination which allows them to make hypothesis and connect one idea to another. By assessing the arguments above, one of the ways for humans to obtain new knowledge is by being able to look at the world in as many different ways as possible. Both artists and scientists should have the characteristics of both experts to be the best at what they are. Although the most prevailing stereotypes of an artist and scientist are polar opposites, we learn that they might not be so different at all in their search of understanding. Stereotypes makes it easier for humans to classify objects, but humans must be able to look past stereotypes for them to see the true aspects of "supposable" two very different professions, as they might not be so different at all. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Art & Design section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Art & Design essays

  1. To what extent may the subjective nature of perception be regarded as an advantage ...

    because it reduces their ability to control the reaction of their audience, and may lead to undesired reactions, or even apathy. Furthermore, human perception is so subjective that the "beautiful" piece of artwork to one person may be horrid to others.

  2. Surrealism - artists and techniques.

    Chirico was a well educated artist. He studied in Athens and Florence and in 1906 he entered the Academy of Fine Arts in Munich. He started painting in 1909 where he returned to Italy. In 1910 he moved to Milan and started painting the first of his 'Metaphysical Town Square' paintings.

  1. Personal Study - Journeys.

    Now, all the way back again. 'Sound Circles' I wrote down the sounds I heard on my landscape journey, influenced by Richard Long's methodology of recording a journey These are the same sounds just compositionally ordered differently, again in a circle, which typifies Richard Longs style (as Long's installation compositions are normally arranged in circles, which symbolises harmony).

  2. Evaluate the ways in which emotion might enhance and/or undermine reasoning as a way ...

    However, emotion does not come up in maths because all of maths can be proved. Emotion is not needed though in maths. Natural sciences is affected by emotion and reasoning in several ways. In natural science, there is an example of where emotion is stronger than reasoning.

  1. Discuss some of the ways that postmodern photographic practice questions, critiques, or opposes Modernist ...

    This is an acceptance that he is present in the creation of the artwork. Additionally his photographs depict an entirely fictitious situation, a "mock-up" if you will of an historical period. This is further fictitious because colour was not available in the Victorian era and he is a black man in aristocracy.

  2. Self, Body and Portrait

    Although early autobiographies existed, the use of the term to characterise the genre of narrating ones own life was not common until the end of eighteenth century. Autobiographies could take the form of memoirs or diaries and were frequently published after the author's death.

  1. Man Ray

    Though he didn't speak a word of French at first, he was welcomed into this group and became its unofficial photographer. Among the many models from this period were Pablo Picasso, Ernest Hemingway, Salvador Dali, Gertude Stein, James Joyce, and the famous performer, Kiki of Montparnasse.

  2. There are various political and economic elements affected an ongoing growth of the arts.

    The Protestant objects like pictures or statues of saints in the church are considered as a sign of "Popish idolatry" (Gombrich 374). Religious arts were considered and symbolized the corruption of the churches and the popes. As a result, new kinds of paintings were established during the 17th and 18th century.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work