• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Corporate governance exercise

Extracts from this document...


Facts Various conduct by Bernadette and Charles raise concerns of breaches of directors' duties on their part. The conduct in issue essentially include the information disseminated by Bernadette and Charles to prospective investors of Dextrous Investments Pty Ltd ("DIL"), the sale of shares in Indonesian electricity companies held by Acme Energy Limited ("Acme"), Bernadette's unilateral undertaking of issuing Acme's shares to DIL to cover DIL's loss in the sale, and the purchase and sale agreement prepared and signed by Bernadette and Charles. Roles As Bernadette is a director of Acme,1 she owes general law and statutory duties to Acme. Charles, on the other hand, is not a director under the statutory definition. Nevertheless, his position as the Deputy Chief Financial Officer ("DCFO") of Acme indicates that he, being part of Acme's senior management, has the capacity to affect Acme's financial standing, or participates in making decisions that affect the whole or a substantial part of the business of Acme. Accordingly, Charles is an officer of Acme and therefore he also owe duties to the company. 2 Issue One: Common law and Statutory duty of care, skill and diligence (S 180 (1)) Common law and statutory duty of care are equivalent,3 except where the statutory duty applies to both directors and other officers of the company.4 Under common law, there is no uniform standard of care but the minimum requirement of care is what a reasonable person, being objectively ascertained, in the director's position in particular company would exercise.5 Considerations should also be awarded to factors such ...read more.


In this case the 'but for' test is the dominant authority.20 One of Bernadette's purposes of issuing shares to DIL was to cover DIL's losses and accordingly to ensure she would receive her management fee, which is arisen from self-interest and therefore improper. But for this improper purpose, there appears to be no other legitimate purposes for Bernadette to issue such shares to DIL, considering there is no genuine necessity for Acme to obtain immediate finance from DIL. Therefore, together with Bernadette's misuse of her position in Acme,21 these findings indicate that she has breached her duty for acting for improper purposes. Issue Four: Common Law duty of loyalty to avoid conflicts of interests This duty applies to both direct and indirect interests of Bernadette. Firstly, a breach of this duty requires a real and sensible possibility of conflict that is objectively ascertained, rather than the mere potential for such.22 The issue of Acme's shares to DIL in the present case was entirely motivated by Bernadette's remuneration, which is in clear conflict with the interest of Acme's shareholders. Secondly, where conflict exists, Bernadette can act if she makes adequate disclosure and obtains the consent of Acme, or any other steps that are reasonable upon the circumstances.23 Bernadette, however, has not disclosed this matter to Acme's board of directors. In fact, from Bernadette's conduct it seems likely that she deliberated concealed such matter from the knowledge of Acme's management. ...read more.


5 Daniels v Anderson per Clarke and Sheller JJA. 6 ASIC v Rich per Austin J 7 Daniels v Anderson per Clarke and Sheller JJA. 8 s1041A - Although after this sale there is Acme will still have to report a loss on other business areas, without having to report its losses on Indonesian investments will reduce the potential negative impact on Acme's share price. In the present case, whether there is market manipulation depends on the motive of the sale. If it was to minimize reportable losses which may affect its share price then it could amount to market manipulation. As present facts indicate that the setting up of DIL is one of Bernadette and Charles' innovative solutions to prevent Acme having to report its first ever loss, s1041A is breached. 9 ASIC v Alder 10 S180(2) 11 S181(1)(a) 12 Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas Ltd (1946) 1 All ER 512 13 Equiticorp Finance v BNZ (93) NSW 14 Fitzsimmons v R 15 Parke v Daily News Ltd 16 State of SA v Marcus Clark 17 Explain - or see above 18 ASIC v Alder 19 S181(1)(b) 20 (obiter in Whitehouse - Whitehouse rejected a 'dominant purpose' test advocated in Ngurli, Mills, Harlowe's. 21 ASIC v Alder 22 ASIC v Adler, Phipps 23 ASIC v Adler 24 S 191 25 S53a 26 S208(1) 27 s229(3) 28 s229(2) 29 s228(4) 30 S210 31 ss212(1)(c) 32 R v Byrnes 33 ASIC v Adler; R v Byrnes. 34 ASIC v Alder 35 s1317(2) 36 S1317AA ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Structures, Objectives & External Influences section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Structures, Objectives & External Influences essays

  1. Explain the purpose of keeping accurate financial records.

    For example financial statements are drawn up on the assumption that there is no intention of the business liquidating. The reasons for which going concern should not be justified is where; * Business is likely to liquidate * Where

  2. Introduction to J Sainsbury plc

    This is because this form of organisation is far less tightly structured than its mechanistic counterpart. Decisions may be made lower down in the hierarchy and jobs are likely to be more shapeless, adapting more readily to meet the changing needs of Sainsbury's.

  1. Business report on J Sainsbury's.

    Underlying profit before tax changed by 14.2% and the profit before tax changed by 30.7%. On February 2001 Sainsbury's supermarkets Ltd became the first major food retailer to achieve the corporate accreditation Investors in People. The Investors in People Standard is tried and tested flexible framework that helps UK companies succeed and compete through improved people performance.

  2. Interpretation of Financial Statements.

    the cash and other assets that are used in operating a business in comparison with the current liabilities - i.e. what has to be paid out in the next twelve months). In the food sector supermarkets pay their suppliers later than is normal for other industries.

  1. Job roles, recruitment, motivation and legislation.

    the recruitment process, the selection process will kick in as a business must select the best workforce or individual available and are right for the job. The selection process can be broken down in the following stages: > Shortlist > Writing letters inviting candidates to interview > Preparing interview documentation

  2. Corporate Governance - Shareholder's duty of care.

    multiple principals -the shareholders, creditors, suppliers, clients, employees and other parties with whom the CEO engages in business on behalf of the corporation5. Therefore, corporate governance rules can be seen as the outcome of the contracting process between the various principals or constituencies and the CEO6.

  1. Business and Management

    way to achieve these aims are the following: by providing good customer service and monitoring levels of waste generated by Tesco's. Tesco's have set out the vision for the future, which they want to work towards the next couple of years.

  2. Applied Business. Investigating a business Preston Manor High School

    Preston manor does surveys with parents during parent evenings, plus the school is introducing surveys on their website so there is a wider range of research methods used to collect information and it will improve the response rate. Preston manor also conduct its market research by using questionnaires, Mail shots, feedback from school council, taster day from 6th form.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work