• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

When Heinrich Schliemann emerged from Turkey in June of 1873 with a sizeable treasure, the whole world took note.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Jenny Petersen Essay #1 When Heinrich Schliemann emerged from Turkey in June of 1873 with a sizeable treasure, the whole world took note. He claimed not only to have found the treasure of King Priam, King of the ancient city of Troy in Homer's epic, but more importantly he claimed to have discovered the actual ruins of what he believed to be the infamous and lost city of Troy. Within days Schliemann was famous all over the world, and throughout the course of his life, and after more than fifty years of archeological research, he was adorned with the title "father of modern-day archeology." Schliemann's timely findings may lead many to believe that he was indeed one of the luckiest men in history, but others have delved into the life of Schliemann as both a man and an archeologist, and after learning about what may seem like minor faux pas and irrelevant mistakes, they have come to conclude that although he was a successful scientist, Schliemann was a liar, a thief, and a fraud in both his personal life and in his career as an archeologist. J. Lesley Fitton, William Caulder, David Traiil, and David Turner are just four of the thousands of educated scholars that have taken it upon themselves to learn about Schliemann and to recognize and uncover the crucial lies that Schliemann told time and again about himself and about his career. Schliemann's personal life was full of grand achievements and grave deficits, and in all of his years of fame and stardom, ...read more.

Middle

Caulder and Traill expose the possibility of this statement as a lie when they acknowledge to the reader than Schliemann claims to have written a dissertation in Greek about his excavations at Ithaca, and sent his dissertation to the University of Rostock, where he was soon after honored with a Ph.D (Caulder, Traill, p 23). Caulder writes: "I soon discovered that no 'dissertation in ancient Greek' existed at Rostock, only a wretched translation into that language...on which the Greek professor...reported to the dean that " ' The ignoranceof Greek endings and sentence construction shows that the author has never passed a course in Greek syntaz and therefore is incapable of forming a complete, independent sentence...' " (Caulder, Traill, p 23). Schliemann had lied once again, and this time he had lied "in print" to create the deceiving impression that he "had mastered a learned language which he scarcely knew" (Caulder, Traill, p 23). But this wasn't the last lie that Schliemann would disclose in his diary. In his diary entry for February 21, 1851, Schliemann claims that he had visited with President Fillmore and his wife for over one and a half hours, when there is indeed no evidence, in either newspapers or press releases, that Schliemann had ever met the President of the United States. Moreover, Schliemann fabricated yet another lie about being present in San Francisco at the time of the famous 1851 San Francisco earthquake and fire. ...read more.

Conclusion

We will never really know, however, if Schliemann faked his magnificent find. Maybe the only person who ever knew the truth was Schliemann's beautiful Greek wife, Sophia, whom Schliemann lied about helping him pull Priam's treasure from the earth. Schliemann wrote in one of his diaries: " "It would, however, have been impossible for me to have removed the treasure without the help of my dear wife, who stood by me ready to pack the things which I cot out in her shawl and to carry them away.' " But. Sophia wasn't even at Troy the day Schliemann discovered Priam's Treasure. She had gone to Athens almost a month prior and did not return until after the discovery. Schliemann later explains his dishonesty in a letter to Charles Newton: "I am endeavoring to make an archaeologist of her, I wrote in my book that she had been present and assisted me in taked out the treasure. I merely did so to stimulate and encourage her, for she had great capacities" (Fitton, p 69). If Schliemann lied about situations as significant as these, he most certainly told untrue stories about other events throughout his career as an archaeologist. How much of his own work is actually reliable if this is the case? Generally, these fabrications are too typical of Schliemann, a professional archaeologist of his time. Although he was less of a learned man than many of his colleagues, Schliemann certainly appears to be even less of a learned man today as more inaccuracies continue to be unearthed about Schliemann as a man and as an archeologist. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Classics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Classics essays

  1. In your opinion, where did the real power lie within the Spartan Constitution?

    once had, it's only reasonable to assume that such a role would fall to others. The Gerousia, comprising of the 28 'elders' - all of whom were over sixty and retired from military service - and the two Kings, was the Supreme Court of Sparta; they had the 'final say'

  2. How far was Plato's perception of rhetoric a consistent one?

    After all, the city cannot have 'wisdom and judgement because of the knowledge of its carpenters'21, as this would simply make it 'good at carpentry'22. 'The quality of good judgement is clearly a form of knowledge, as it is because of knowledge and not because of ignorance that we judge well.'23.

  1. Euripides was accused by his contempories of being a woman hater. Why do you ...

    blames Athene of betrayal as she and the other Muses and Phoebus trained Mousaios who was associated with Athene is some way. In 'Rhesos' the female characters are not developed as fully as the male characters and the above written word probably add up to more words then both spoke in the play.

  2. Why did the Romans invade Britain and how did they affect it?

    Roman British who wanted to receive the word of certain deities were to congregate outside of the temple as an altar-group, and wait for the priests' pronouncements. The Romans also changed the way the British lived. The Romans encouraged urban life as opposed to rural life.

  1. A Rose For Emily by William Faulkner

    Faulkner represents Emily's rejection to change and wish to live in the past through dialog and description of setting. For example, when the mayor comes to her house to discuss her taxes, after sending her three notices in the mail, she repeats that her father took care of it with Colonel Satoris and does not owe anything.

  2. Shows how de Bernires uses myth in "Captain Corelli's Mandolin".

    According to Homer, Achilles came to Troy leading the 50 ships of the Myrmidons. In the last year of the siege, when Agamemnon stole the captive princess Briseis from him, Achilles angrily withdrew and took his troops from the war.

  1. Is Aeneas pious, and would the Romans of Augustan Rome have thought him to ...

    Virgil was rumoured to believe that love and hate were both redundant as they were both concept which wavered from the âpathâ of fate, creating two opposites that were equally negative to a stoic. This perhaps explains why Virgil shows that the acceptance of fate and your destiny is the only way to achieve rationality.

  2. Lessons Learned From The Illiad

    Nestor advised Agamemnon to ask Achilles for help and be reconciled with him. Agamemnon, according to the suggestion of Nestor, then sent Phoenix, Ajax, and Odysseus to come to Achilles. In book 9, we can see clearly the pride of Achilles.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work