• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20

A Study of Globalisation - A study of multinationals and their effect on our local communities

Extracts from this document...


Globalisation A study of multinationals and their effect on our local communities (Above: Guatemalan farmers show a carefree front as their simple lives are turned upside down by multinational food retail giants.) Presented to: Dr. Peter Sheldrake By: Steven Leptos (s3053319) Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary 3 Introduction to Globalisation 4 - 6 Definition 4 Pro-Globalisation 4, 5 Anti-Globalisation 5, 6 Globalisation & Multinational Companies Social Impact 7-9 Branding 7 Multinationals 7-9 The Food Chain; Survival of the Biggest - (Case Study) 10-15 Introduction 10-12 Guatemala's Local Farmers 13-15 Conclusion 16, 17 References 18-20 Executive Summary This paper attempts to make sense of globalisation from a social and business perspective. Initially I will talk briefly about globalisation within our community and the different stand points those communities and individuals have taken; for and against globalisation. I will then talk about the multinational companies that have made the phenomenon of globalisation possible and these companies various impacts on societies and local communities around the world. The topic is further analysed by using multinational food retailing companies in Latin America as a case study. Displayed to the reader through this case will be a clear indication of how local communities and in particular their farmers are affected by globalisation and multinational companies. There are many different views on globalisation; and those against it oppose many different aspects of it. One of the countless reasons why there are anti-globalisation activists is due to the following: Multinational food retailing companies, the backbone of what is known as 'globalisation' within the supermarket industry, have in many cases entered small farming communities around the globe and destroyed a way of life for many of the farmers and labourers around them. Within Latin America these farmers have been forced to flee their homes to find refuge within the slums of the urban sprawls within their cities or even to cross borders into the USA. ...read more.


'Commodity prices have fallen dramatically, by some two thirds over the past 30 years, so that farmers have had to triple production just to maintain their incomes. One example among many: in just the last three years, Tanzanian farmers experienced a decline of 50% in the price of coffee.' (OXFAM 2001) 'While farmers earn less, consumers have been paying more.' (O'Neill 2001) Although, according to the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organisation, Latin America produces four times the amount of food needed to feed the population, 58 million people are still malnourished. Introduction: During the 1980's a transformation within Latin America began; this transformation was one that would shape the future of farmers all over the continent for decades to come. For some it would be a positive change, however a large majority found it to be the opposite. The transformation I talk about is opening up of trade barriers within Latin America in order to allow food retailing companies access to the regions 'un-commercialised' and fertile lands. During the 1990's the revolution in food retailing within Latin America accelerated extraordinarily as countries unbolted their economies to suit conditions for financing from the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. As Latin America's overall FDI significantly increased; multinational food retailers bought out local chains and entered joint ventures with the obstinate ones. The greatest fears for farmers in the region were realised when the multinational companies introduced unfair trade rivalry from American and European growers with weighted financial backing. Small farmers are constantly left to compete with the biggest world players as these food retailing chains (products of globalisation) move from large cities to smaller towns and from economically sound countries to ones still developing their economic and social systems (Dugger 2004). These chains are now the prevailing force in the trade of processed foods and they're produce sales are growing to a similar reputation. ...read more.


The reason for this is due to the fact that there were; only on occasion, very rare and unusual success stories to be found about smaller farmers succeeding in their sales to companies such as Ahold and Walmart, within Latin America. After researching farming communities' around the globe, it can be deduced that Latin America is not alone in this battle to produce food and sell it at competitive prices, while still maintaining some sort of meaningful social existence. Asian, African and Indian farmers; have been heavily exploited. Even farmers within more developed countries such as Australia have had to sell their products at severely discounted prices in order to satisfy multinational company standards. Farmers world wide, are however, not alone. Traditional strategies of help to farmers that feel the hardships of globalisation, such as providing fertilizers and improved seeds, are no longer enough to enable them to sustain their businesses. Professors and agronomists are banding together to document trends and develop new methods of help that will allow the fleeing farmers of Latin America, Africa and Asia to compete with others in selling products to the multinationals. In the midst of the these methods a few techniques stand out, such as; regulations put upon the multinationals that require farmers be paid promptly, laws that restrain these companies from dominating entire markets (such as mergers of supermarket chains) and enhanced hygiene and convenience through technology at open-air markets. After reading this paper I hope you too can conclude it is important that societies living within the limitations of this amazing world are given the chance to experience life's pleasures and break out of the chain of inevitable failures that multinational corporations have brought to them. Being given the chance to make an honest and fair living, is only basic compassion and mercy; two marvellous characterises that any individual can encompass. If multinational food retail companies and global companies in general were able to, in some way, display this, then Anti-Globalisation would be a much less used expression. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Discuss the extent to which globalisation has been beneficial to Africa, China, America or ...

    5 star(s)

    China could have looked at the UK and USA's policies and how their government worked. They experienced EOI (export orientated industrialisation) which was done through a free market approach and small positive government intervention to provide the social infrastructure for growth and human development.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    International Business Strategy - Case Study on Unilever

    4 star(s)

    The third level is transnational. Companies at this level have some sort of integrated business units in other countries. They tend to make greater effort to address local needs and appreciate cultural difference. Truly global is the fourth level of globalization.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Advantages and disadvantages of Globalisation. Need for development.

    4 star(s)

    beet in northern Europe, whereas it would be far cheaper from the West Indies. Our countryside might be better switching marginal land to new villages with large gardens as refuges for nature from farm pesticides, and let LDCs use their cheap land, labour and climate.

  2. The Impact of Globalisation upon the Japanese Economy

    Globalisation has affected Japan's economic growth and development in several ways. Japan has suffered from recession and deflation of -0.3%, rising unemployment of 5.5%, reduced GDP during the past few year of 0.4 in 2001 and 0.2 during 2002.8 However, Japan has had a recent growth in GDP of 2%, which could signify a general trend upwards.

  1. A study of Patent system in India in the light of Patent Cooperation Treaty.

    under PCT in the year 2002, which representing 10% increase in the Previous Year14. The surprising factor was that, in the year 2002 itself, the application from developing countries rose from 680 in 1997 to 5359 in 2002 and the most astonished factor was that the highest percentage increase by developing countries were recorded by India i.e.

  2. "What do sociologists mean by the term 'Globalisation' and how have they tried to ...

    Companies are operating in two or more countries across the national boundaries, with production taking place in one region and trade taking place in another, mostly in Western countries. What sociologists, such as Giddens and Marsh argue is that this is all in effect the same as the past international

  1. Free essay

    Adam Smith "invisible hands"

    'In perfect free market system the market forces of supply and demand would lead to the optimal allocation of resources whereas social marginal benefit equals the social marginal cost and community surplus is maximised.' (Gillespie, 2007, p102) Price mechanism, the salient feature of a free market economy, acts as the

  2. Write a written report on Globalisation

    These are emerging markets because they are nations with social or business activity in the process of rapid growth and industrialization. The emerging markets are said to reshape the economic landscape which will enhance prosperity. However, presently, the global economy could be hurt if the withdrawal of funds for emerging

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work