• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Legal control of multinational corporations: problems and prospects".

Extracts from this document...


LAW 410 ASSIGNMENT 2 Suggested Topic #25 "Legal control of multinational corporations: problems and prospects" The greatest evil is not now done in those sordid "dens of crime" that Dickens loved to paint. It is not done even in concentration camps and labour camps. In those we see its final result. But it is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails, and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voices. (C.S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters) As the name "Multinational" suggests, today's corporate giants are no longer shackled by the constraints of international borders. Previously the bulk of world production occurred within national boundaries, but in recent decades trade and production has become increasingly globalised, and corporate activity has diversified and multiplied. The market is now global, as is capacity for production. Legal and political framework is traditionally based on the nation state, however economic activity is no longer such, and it is this mobility of capital that threatens to undermine the power of national governments to deal with traditional economic and social issues1. Critics charge that the ability of multinationals to manage production on a global scale and leap national borders in search of lower costs and higher profits now threatens democracy itself2. These monoliths are less attached than ever to their country of origin, they operate without territorial loyalty or connection, and as their loyalty fades so does any ultimate responsibility for their actions. There has been a growing voice from various quarters calling for a delimitation of the responsibilities of multinational corporations (MNCs) to reflect their increasing influence in society3. It is argued that corporations, though formed primarily to maximise profit, should be under more strenuous legal - as well as a moral - obligation to respect and promote national laws and social standards. ...read more.


But these acts fail to reach the real violator, providing only superficial justice, and in any case, corporations simply relocate if they encounter regulatory issues in a country of operation. MNCs have long outgrown the legal structures that govern them, reaching a level of transnationality and economic power that exceeds the power of domestic laws alone to impose basic legal and human rights norms18. Private internal codes of conduct have been touted as a possible regulatory solution. Internal codes are popular with MNCs in the textiles and clothing industries, including Gap, Levi Strauss and Nike, as a means of addressing labour rights in developing countries. In fact over 60 per cent of the top 500 companies have codes19. Internal codes offer a number of advantages. Firstly, in countries where law enforcement mechanisms are weak, self-regulation may be more persuasive and effective. Secondly they are efficient, as they avoid time-consuming negotiation processes inherent in national and international instruments. They are also flexible, allowing customisation to individual companies and countries. The key issue with internal codes relates to the weakness of enforcement provisions and compliance mechanisms. Usually the enforcement, compliance and monitoring provisions are either inadequate or simply non-existent20. The codes are not legally binding, so in effect flimsy. Furthermore, the codes often don't apply to subcontractors or subsidiaries, or universally across all operations, and they are costly to implement21. The elaborate rhetoric of company codes are often no more than a public relations tool. Internal codes lack bite. As UK Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said, "we must do what we can to encourage corporate responsibility, but we cannot leave companies to regulate themselves globally any more than we do in our national economies"22. Non-Government Organisations (NGOs) offer another avenue of regulation. However like an internal code, NGO regulation would be voluntary, and thus legally impotent. So to the second dilemma: what are the exact areas or activities which are to be regulated? ...read more.


The UN is not well placed, compared with WTO, to enforce legal control. As UN Assistant Secretary-General John Ruggie said about Global Compact: "this is not a code of conduct and the UN has neither the mandate nor the capacity to verify corporate compliance". Director of UNICEF, Carol Bellamy, warned that "it is dangerous to assume that the goals of the private sector are somehow synonymous with those of the United Nations, because they most emphatically are not"29. If any prospective regulation is to be successful then the 'home' countries of MNCs - the country of incorporation and profit repatriation - must play a role. Where MNCs operate at home they are answerable to their governments, yet developed countries have largely failed to take responsibility for the operations of their corporations overseas30. Home states are typically developed countries with a stronger legal and political infrastructure than the typical host states. Extraterritorial regulatory initiatives by home states of MNCs are important because, as compared to the host state, they usually have greater potential to be both viable and effective. The extent of corporation's responsibilities will provide long and complex debate, but a few core standards, aligned with current OECD and UN guidelines, should be fairly easily agreed upon. The standards would stipulate the minimum to be expected of the MNCs, and it would be normal business practice to meet them. In summary, the prospects for an international regulatory framework legally controlling MNCs are good. Moves have already been made by specialist international bodies, and an avid interest in corporate behaviour by NGOs will keep the topic high on the international agenda. As market liberalisation increases, and the power of MNCs with it, the major steps towards control will come. But, as demonstrated in this article, the problems associated with organising, implementing and enforcing control are many. Given the complex nature of the problems at least one thing is almost certain, an integrated regulatory framework, rather than single international, national or internal agreements, is needed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    What are some of the problems of WTO mechanisms will pose for national governments?

    3 star(s)

    For example, since the U.S. ban on DDT had more to do with what it did to birds than with what its effect on humans, they would not be allowed as a goal under WTO. The countries cannot seek to help the environment through food standards.


    The international division of production has been accompanied by growing flows of manufactured goods, which take a growing share of international trade. There is relatively less bulk liquids (such as oil) and more dry bulk and general cargo being traded.

  1. Many examples of Companies working globally are: Nike, Adidas and other companies which may ...

    Well it is bad in the way it affects factory workers and those in poor countries but I will go into more depth later. The other means like telephone and internet help to connect to others. Now let's look at TNC's again.

  2. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    Jan Tumlir, in contrast, was very much a classical liberal lone voice in arguing for international rules more along nineteenth century lines. Put another way, he recouples free trade abroad to limited government and laisser faire at home, with the individual elements mutually reinforcing each other to secure the maximum of economic freedom.

  1. There are 3 areas to judge for sustainability. 1. Economic sustainability. 2.Social sustainability. 3. ...

    Poverty and overpopulation means the poor are forced to cut down forests for fuel and to exhaust their soil. They leave little for their children to survive on and the world may be heading for malnutrition at some time without more sustainable methods.

  2. Globalisation of GAP

    I found that this was a partly bad decision. I found that Gap found entering into the European market very difficult finding it hard to please the customer and increase sales. As I said earlier Gap's intention's when opening stores in both France and the UK were positive however the share price does not suggest this.

  1. Why has GDP growth been so slow in Somalia?

    But why is piracy such a popular choice? Piracy is flourishing in Somalia as it is a quick way for all involved to earn a large amount of money way beyond any other means of income generation. While the action of piracy involves some risk the benefits far outweigh that risk, a fact indicated by the few arrests made.

  2. Free essay

    Multinational Corporations in context

    On another note BOC London Branch, the first overseas branch of the Chinese banks, was established in 1929 and from then on the firm has spread to several other regions. It is prominently recognised as the oldest bank in the People's Republic of China and currently operates in over 27 countries.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work