• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the implications of globalization for international order?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What are the implications of globalization for international order? Globalization is a very popular concept very much talked about in the world today. It is considered by many to be interdependence and cooperation between states. Therefore, one can assume that globalization can have a positive affect on international order as all states would cooperate and have the same interests and that would lead to peaceful international relations and the enforcement of international order. Firstly, I shall start my essay by formally defining both the globalization and international order. I shall do this by giving my definition of both terms and put forward the name of a few scholars and their definitions. I will then talk about the implications of globalization for international order once again by putting forward the arguments of a few scholars, evaluating these arguments. Finally, I will conclude my essay by writing about my own beliefs taken from what I have read and the way I have interpreted my readings. I am hoping to conclude that globalization can have positive and negative consequences for international order as it is possibly good for the world economy but can also lead to inequality, that inequality leading to instability and preventing international order. ...read more.

Middle

An argument put forward by Stanley Hoffman is that "order in international relations consists of formal or informal rules that allow for the moderation of disputes and for a measure of security and stability."6 David Armstrong argues that "order denotes stability and regularity in the pattern of assumptions, rules and practices that are accepted as legitimate among the members of a given society and that concern the mechanisms of and the limits to the process of change within that society."7 Having read the arguments of the scholars above I have come to the conclusion that the basic concept of international order is to bring about stability and security in international relations. Bearing in mind that one of the major implications of globalisation is that it promotes inequality among states I believe that it is not wrong to assume that one of the implications of globalisation for international order is that it causes instability. The concept of globalization today is to turn the world into a "global communication" agency that covers most of the global issues. In other words to make all the countries of the world integrated so that one country's problem would be every other country's problem therefore pressure them to provide help. ...read more.

Conclusion

When first writing this essay I though that I would find a middle ground and have a two sided argument providing a balanced essay however the more I read about globalization the more I came to a biased conclusion that globalisation brings about inequality and that some get advantaged by it and others get severely disadvantaged by it and end up worse that they started off. I perfect example of this is Indonesia. The world bank helped Indonesia by giving them a great sum of money that was supposed to "help" the country develop however the money given to them benefited world capitalism and the richer countries became richer by that loan as the people in Indonesia had to work very hard to pay off the loan and the huge taxes that came with it, the level of production of the country decreased, people couldn't afford to eat as well as they used to and therefore got exhausted very quickly and became incapable of working as hard as they used to. As a result of this the country became poorer than it was before it got the loan as Indonesia is poor and on top of that has a huge loan with high rate of interest to pay. Furthermore, considering that globalization has all of the consequences stated above I have come to the conclusion that in a globalizing world international order is very hard to enforce. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is Increased globalization a good thing?

    5 star(s)

    The per-capita income in the richest twenty countries is 37 times greater than that in the 20 poorest7. Accordingly, globalisation cannot, and does not, serve interests of all countries in the world. To conclude, globalization refers to a process in which the world is in many respects becoming a single place.

  2. The positive and negative effects of Globalization

    Many countries remain poor and the gap between the rich and the poor nations is continually increasing, this is the case for many African and Eastern European countries where the HDI has fallen. It is believed that increasing inequality is a direct result of market forces.

  1. Is globalization a new phenomenon in world politics?

    The argument of globalization not being a new phenomenon can be taken even further by saying that ever since man has travelled and left his place

  2. Free essay

    Adam Smith "invisible hands"

    If marginal social benefits have exceeded marginal social costs, it will be socially efficient to increase production; or vice versa. Equity is 'fair distribution of resources', which free market economy claimed as fail to lead both (ibid, p190). Government intervention can be conducted in various ways, such as legislation, taxation and subsidies; however, is claimed may lead to several issues.

  1. Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye have described international relations as exhibiting 'complex interdependence'. What ...

    The model states that the use of these non-state actors by Governments will be essential to resolve issues of international dispute. Or as in the case of the dispute between Japan and China over the formers safeguards over agricultural items the prospect of a dispute being taken to a non-state actor (the WTO in this case)

  2. Discuss Globalization.

    They achieved their goal of preventing war and at the same time significantly helped the development of globalization. In the 21st century, globalization has had a variety of impacts on international politics.

  1. Corruption and Globalisation - Both of them have been so pervasive in recent years. ...

    It has been clear that corruption has heavy negative impact on globalisation. Benefits of globalisation are eroded by corruption. But on the other hand, does globalisation itself increases corruption? There is no clear evidence of that, however, corruption has been paid much more attention nowadays in the globalising world than in the past.

  2. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    countries, especially in the developing world, to accept inappropriate conditions in regional agreements, such as minimum labour and environmental standards. This in turn makes it easier to sneak these issues into the WTO. The net effect is to further politicise international trade.64 RTAs have proliferated in practically all regions of the world economy since the 1980s.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work