• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare 'The Drum' by John Scott and 'The Send-off' by Wilfred Owen

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare 'The Drum' by John Scott and 'The Send-off' by Wilfred Owen Both writers have different ways of presenting their ideas about slaughter and sacrifice. While in The Drum, John Scott plainly shows that his feelings are that those who died in the war are being slaughtered and not sacrificed. Meanwhile, in the Send-off, Owen shows the ignorance of the people at home, who do not know the true horrors of the war. In the Drum, from the first line of the poem, John Scott immediately let's the readers know his dislike of the war by saying 'I hate that drum's discordant sound,' This is referring to the drum that is sound before the men go out to battle. Therefore, John Scott associates the sound of the drum war. As John Scott says he hates the drum he is showing is hatred of the war and slaughter that goes on. As this line is repeated in the second stanza, it emphasises the writer's hatred of the war. Another way Scott effectively presents his ideas is by using different language in each of the stanzas. ...read more.

Middle

In Wilfred Owen's poetry he presents the idea that sacrifice, is not being fully appreciated. This can be seen at the beginning of the poem when the soldiers are being sent off on the train. The lack of support is suggested by the stillness of the poem. Especially when it says 'They were not ours' Owen is trying to show that these men are sacrificing their lives for their country, so therefore there should be some more support. The Send-off shows the ignorance of the slaughter back at home. In the poem there are clear differences between what people at home think is happening in the war and the actual realities that the soldiers face at the frontline. This can be seen by the idea of the flowers. 'Their breasts were stuck all white with wreath and spray.' The flowers here are supposed to be for celebration, however the colour suggests something else entirely. The fact that the wreath is white gives the impression of a funeral. This is showing that Owen's view is that once the soldiers are sent off there is a slim chance of them ever returning. ...read more.

Conclusion

These two lines, clearly present Scott's view on the destruction and damage, the war causes. As the poem is written in rhyming couplets it effectively shows the writers message. The structure and content of the poem is simple, which helps enforce the message. However, on the other hand, I believe, Owen's message is far more chilling. Even though Owen's message is not stated, the readers have a clear view on Owen's view of the war. The mere mention of 'siding-shed' immediately gives the readers the image of slaughterhouses. So the readers are prepared for the soldier's fate. Scott's aim is for the readers to know his hatred of the war, while Owen wants the readers to know the truth about the war. Owen seems to want the poem to shock the reader, which is why I think the short lines, that stand out are so haunting. An example of this is 'In wild train-loads?' The question mark really drives home about how many soldiers are not returning, because of the sacrifice they have to make. Also as Owen criticises people at home's view on the war, it gets the readers thinking about how they too perceive the war. Therefore, I feel that Owen's message is more effective than Scott's. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This essay is set out as comparative essay but instead the analysis covers each poem in almost full isolation. There are some good points made but further links need to be made between the poems to show an understanding of the similarities and differences in the texts.

3 Stars

Marked by teacher Laura Gater 09/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The causes of world war one

    4 star(s)

    source of light automatic firepower that could be carried and operated by one man. By 1916 each infantry Battalion was equipped with 8 guns and by 1917 this figure had risen to 16, one for each platoon. Although somewhat delicate and prone to jam in the dirty conditions of trench

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The poem that I have chosen to analyse is "Exposure" by Wilfred Owen.

    3 star(s)

    Wilfred Owen calls it their "forgotten dreams". The forgotten dreams could either be there hopes of returning home alive and well to their families, or it could mean that the men are thinking about why they were lied to about how they were going to return home, after a short war, a hero.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critical Response: 'The Sentry' by Wilfred Owen.

    3 star(s)

    The next few lines of the poem I think are the most emotional and memorable: "Eyeballs, huge-bulged like squids', Watch my dreams still; but I forgot him there In posting next for duty," The vivid depiction of the sentry's eyes I found quite disturbing, but these lines clearly portray the harshness and reality that the men had to endure.

  2. "'Lions led by donkeys.' How valid is this interpretation of the conduct of British ...

    It is also not clear whether Lloyd George feels the commanding the army was too big a responsibility for any one, or just Haig. Source D1 does, however, support the "Lions led by Donkeys" interpretation. Source D3 also supports this view.

  1. WAR POETRY: Themes in War Poetry

    They had to try and survive through although most did not and many watched as fellow soldiers, their friends died, while they were helpless in stopping the suffering of the horrors that war brought along with the battles. Owen makes the reader feel like they are actually witnessing the events

  2. Regeneration - The Horror of Pity and War

    stories they'd devoured as boys-consisted of crouching in a dugout, waiting to be killed' (Chapter 9, page 107) This highlights the irony of the First World War and reflects the paradox of the war. Barker shows the frustration of the war, which empathises the realism and de-romanticization of the war

  1. War poetry analysis

    Wilfred Owen is famous for his disapproval of poets such as Jessie Pope who glamorised war by making it seem trivial and making people feel guilty and a disappointment to their country for not wanting to fight. Owen produced a more realistic portrayal of the injuries that could be obtained during war.

  2. Explore the way Nature is effective in Wilfred Owen's Exposure

    (The soldiers). In addition this presents the idea that there is no escape for these men as there is obviously more wind than there is men therefore, everyone will be receiving the same hostile treatment. Furthermore, wind has the ability to strike them all over there is no protection against the wind like there is equipment against the Germans.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work