• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Coursework on Trenches

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What was it like in the trenches? A century after World War One, historians still question the facts and the many ways soldiers survived the War. They ask questions about the uprising of the War, the number of total deaths and most importantly, life in the trenches. What is a trench? Why were they built? Why were trenches so important? What were conditions like in the trenches? What did soldiers think of them? In 1914, World War One began. Germany was determined to match Great Britain's great success in creating their vast colonies and empires all over the world, some of which included; India, Australia, North America. They plotted against Britain, hence the Schlieffen Plan. This was an idea to prevent Germany fighting on two fronts. They were to fight against France and Russia, both part of the Triple Entente, an alliance formed by Great Britain. Germany believed that defeating France would have to be quick enough so that they could rapidly travel east again, so that they could deal with Russia. However, there was only one problem. The problem was passing through Belgium. Britain had promised to help them, if it were to be attacked. It was merely impossible for Germany to get to France any other way, so it could not be prevented. News of Germany's arrival ignited the flame to the war. War had begun! Commandos and generals were certain that the war would only be won on the western front. They believed building 'trenches' would help carry out assaults on the enemy and gain the initiative in the war. The building of trenches was one of the most important aspects of the World War. A trench was a dug - out underneath the ground, at least two metres deep and two metres wide. It was dug in a particular zig - zag so that a blast from an enemy's exploding shell would only affect a confined section of the trench. ...read more.

Middle

Whereas inaccurate shelling would just waste shells as shown by this, '400 shells came over ... no one was hurt'. This source was viewed from a sergeant who would not have seen much of the deaths of shelling (shouting commands instead), therefore the number of deaths may be an estimate and not exact. Tactics were extremely important for both sides to win the war. 'Shelling' was one form of tactic. Another was 'attrition'. Lord Kitchener was a great supporter of attrition, the theory of grinding down the opposition over a long period of time; eventually the enemy would have to yield. It was believed that bombarding the enemy over a long period of time would fend them off. This could not break the stalemate. Both countries were so well equipped and equally matched, that it seemed at times the battle between the two would go nowhere (stalemate). A good example of this was the Battle of the Somme, which lasted five long months. Fortunately, the static style of fighting evolved due to the deployment of new state of the art weaponry. Armies had what they called 'Reconnaissance'. These were missions to gather information about the enemy position. Many soldiers made night - time trips over no man's land to the enemy trench, to familiarise themselves with the whereabouts of the enemy troops. Aeroplanes would often fly - over the enemy trench to take photos as well. During 1915, generals on the Western Front used huge numbers of weapons to break the stalemate. As the war progressed, more and more weapons were invented, which helped many battles at times. Before starting an attack, both sides bombarded each other with shells. The armies used 'heavy artillery' to fire these explosive shells. Heavy artillery was another name for big guns. These guns had enormous power and enabled armies to fire shells long distances. Germans called heavy artillery 'howitzers'. The newer ones in the war were able to fire shells, which exploded into small metal splinters called 'shrapnel'. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, this was one of the reasons of desertion of the war. Soldiers saw their friends die in battle and could not cope with the depression and strains. Many faked injury or escaped from the trenches and returned home. By 1917, thousands of men were deserting the British Army. In theory, soldiers always had plenty to eat. They were mainly supplied a sufficient amount of food such as: Meat (bully beef), Bread, Bacon, Tea, Sugar, Jam, Cheese, Butter, Potatoes, and Seasonings. It was believed that soldiers gained a stone and half (on average) in the trenches. This was partly down to the fact that many soldiers had come from poor backgrounds, therefore got more food in the trenches than at home. Soldiers were made to follow a strict schedule inside their trenches. This was known as the trench routine. This included cooking meals, cleaning, greasing gun barrels and nursing the injured etc. This helped keep many soldiers occupied, as well as preventing them from getting bored. Soldiers often tried to come out of trenches for a bit of an adventure. However, their lives were on the line - as one soldier said: "If you got out of your trench, you were a dead bear". The trenches were obviously a significant part of the First World War, as proved by the sources and from many people that survived the war. Trenches were built to win battles, and as shown, army officers went to any extremes to build them. Conditions in the trenches were poor enough to cause diseases and attract filthy vermin and lice. From this, we can assume the soldiers that lived in the trenches must have not liked them. It can be argued that many enjoyed the experience, as well as many made friends. Army officers and soldiers response to the war was different, as one would be fighting and the other would be shouting commands. I think the trench warfare was really important, as many of our ancestors risked their lives to win the War for Great Britain. http://www.fhm.com/site/games/main.asp ?? ?? ?? ?? Trench warfare coursework Mitul Dave 9BK ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. In the wars, Robert Rose is a very significant character.

    Robert loved and respected his father very much, '..his father got him through it..'(pg.16). Tom played an extremely important role in the life of his son. All the knowledge Robert had taken with him to war had come from his father.

  2. The impact of bombing during WWII

    of view in a humorous satirical manner that appealed to the population. It is an important article as it shows there was a minority of people who thought similarly and also others who would be influenced by it's pessimistic message of the war as it was a popular cartoon.

  1. How Did the Blitz Affect Everyday Life in Britain?

    The end of 1941 added jam, meat and tea added to the list. The Government introduced a point system; each person was allowed food valued at 16 points per month. Shopping became a difficult job; each food had a different number of points!

  2. The Battle of the Somme 1916 - source related study.

    So, having to walk uphill in mud would have made it a slow and difficult process for the soldiers. This in turn made it easier on the German enemy to shoot them down, so few actually got over to the enemy trenches.

  1. The Battle of the Somme 1916

    When it was time to go 'over the top' and the artillery stopped, the Germans would have heard a long anticipated silence. On the school trip, we took a moment to listen to the silence. We knew then that it would have been obvious to the Germans that the silence meant the Allies were about to attack.

  2. Did the Soldiers Themselves, Give a more Accurate Picture of Trench Life than Official ...

    If this were true the source would not show an accurate portrayal of life in the trenches and would therefore be inaccurate and unreliable. This source is still useful. This is because it might still show what it was like for men in some parts of the front line.

  1. History Coursework - World War One Sources Question

    Letters from the front were received regularly, the hobby of writing relieving the boredom felt in many of the quieter parts of the line, both letter writing, and poetry helping to pass the time, while helping their families to feel more secure in the knowledge that they were OK and in good spirits.

  2. Consider the novels ‘Birdsong’ and ‘Regeneration’ compare Faulks’ and Barker’s presentation of life in ...

    even this relief was qualified, since the odour was usually compounded or overwhelmed by stronger and more persistent bodily smells' (birdsong-two links;one about how to do it and one about how somebody who hadnt got the hang of it yet).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work