• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does the Great War deserve to be called Great?

Extracts from this document...


Does the Great War deserve to be called Great? I do not believe that the First World War was great because several million people lost their lives fighting for four years over for a few strips of land which were no more than a mile wide. A lot of people who came back from the war were badly injured and lots had limbs missing, as the only treatment for wounds on limbs was amputation. The new weapons that were used meant people could be killed with horrific ease. The gas that was fired at the soldiers was not very difficult to avoid or to protect against but many soldiers were not trained or equipped to save themselves against the gas. Along time before the war started, Germany had planned what it would do if war was declared. The Germans had planned for a quick war that would not cost many lives on either side. ...read more.


The Germans had not expected the Russian army to mobilise very quickly but it managed to and the Germans had to send back troops to fight it. The different armies tried new tactics with new weapons but they never managed to move the position of the trenches very far for four years. The soldiers were armed with rifles, bayonets, and grenades, which they used to defend their trench with and attack the enemy's trench. Before the troops attacked, the enemy trenches were bombed heavily by long range artillery guns, which smashed the barbed wire defences, and tried to kill as many of the enemy as was possible. As the soldiers attacked they were fired on by machine guns which fired from inside heavily defended bunkers. Thousands of soldiers were cut down every time they attacked. The picture "The Harvest of Battle" showed an endless line of injured soldiers walking back towards their trenches across no-mans land. ...read more.


But old men, who had no idea about how to fight using modern warfare, controlled the soldiers using them. In the film "Gallipoli" it showed how one Australian general sent thousands of soldiers to their deaths even though he had been told that they were being killed before they had gone five yards. The film was a secondary source as the director was not there. The picture and article from "The Punch Magazine" were pointing out that generals would send thousands to their deaths but never enter danger themselves. The sources were both secondary but they were correct. I believe that The First World War did not deserve to be called great. Millions of people were left dead or wounded. The east of France was turned into a dead, boggy wasteland with the soil poisoned from the explosives. When the war ended there was no winner as no land had been gained and both sides had virtually equal losses. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work